Gravity Does Not Exist – The Lorentz Contraction Conundrum

gravity-masonic

There is no such thing as gravity, dielectric acceleration IS (so called) magnetic attraction and IS (so called) gravity. It is one and the same thing, the only difference is coherency.

A magnet is a coherent and polarized object, any spatial extrapolation is polarization necessitatively. What drives a magnet is point non-specific and no different from any other holographic fractal in that respect. It is field incommensurability. A magnet does not have poles it has the inverse of counter-space. Space is the absence of inertia, it has no properties. Space acts on nothing, time acts on nothing. A field in and of itself has no quantity, no physicality, it is not phenomena. Space is a posterior attribute of a field, therefore it does nothing and acts on nothing. Space and Time are not autonomous forces, this is absurd. Modern science has never adequately defined polarity, or quantified a field for that matter.

“A magnet has 2 poles” is a description not an explanation. The loss of inertia necessitates polarity. The rest point in the centre is a result of pressure mediation. It is concentrated there because it is the inverse of space (force and motion) it is counter-space (inertia and acceleration). What we call a magnetic field is a reciprocating precessional hyperboloid resultant of a coherent dielectric object. Electricity is the multiplicative byproduct OF Phi (magnetism) and Psi (dielectricity).

The 800 pound gorilla that shits on the head of modern physics and QM and that is going to turn the world upside down with countless new inventions MUST be and WILL be in dielectrics, not electricity. Classical magnetism does not account for the difference between centripetal convergence and centrifugal divergence and how they interact to cause dielectric voidance or counter-voidance (magnetic vectorization). Which is often incorrectly labelled as magnetic attraction/repulsion.

There is no need for a unified field theory; all fields are already unified. What is not unified is human comprehension of the nature of field modalities in relationship to one another. Mother Nature does not do math and complex calculations with virtual particles. The conjugate forces of reality are simplex and have been understood since ancient times, albeit foolishly dismissed by the arrogance of modern society.

Gravity is left entirely undefined and lacks a scientific denotation in principle, ergo the term is nothing other than a pseudoforce and you may as well say unicorn farts or pixie dust interchangeably. It makes no difference. DESCRIPTIONS ARE NOT EXPLANATIONS!

To summarize, gravity is incoherent dielectric centripetal acceleration towards a null-point of counter-spatial inertia. Essentially a hybrid field modality and byproduct of electromagnetism to put it in layman’s terms. Nothing more.

uni field modalities final final one 0

Proof masses do not accelerate towards each other:

 

Magnetism never attracted anything, it only displaces. When two magnets collide they do not attract towards each other directly but to a a void or counter-spatial null point of inertia between them. 

 

 

 

In regards to atomist relativity theory;

There are no discrete particles in the universe and certainly none that mediate charges, discharges, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation, only fields, all modalities of the Ether. The so-called ‘electrons’ are not particles, not objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle of discharge, and are certainly not charge-carriers, fields are not particles, are not “electrons”, nor assuredly are there energy discharges in the vacuum of space involving ‘electrons’; the ‘electron’ is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even more faulty mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, or an Atomist.

Electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization; magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge; dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether give rise to electrification. Phi times Psi gives Q; ‘electrons’ do not mediate these electrical and magnetic forces or likewise the Ether fields.

There is a widespread belief that individual Lorentz – Einstein transformation equations have a physical significance of their own and can be used independently of each other. Thus, for example, some authors believe that for transforming the electric field of a parallel-plate capacitor or of a line charge from one reference frame to another it is sufficient to use only the charge-density transformation equation. Similarly, some authors believe that the same seemingly correct results can be obtained by using just the electric and magnetic field transformation equations. An analysis of field expressions obtained by means of such transformation methods shows, however, that these expressions are incorrect. In order to obtain correct expressions for electric and magnetic fields by means of Lorentz – Einstein transformation equations, the equations must be used collectively, so that all transformable quantities in the system under consideration are properly transformed.

These and similar errors in the understanding of relativistic concepts and equations frequently result in incorrect representations of physical phenomena and in various relativistic “paradoxes” that have caused some scientists to criticize and even to reject relativity theory as such.

The answer is simple: As a physical phenomenon the relativistic (kinematic) Lorentz contraction does not exist. And the fact that several revisions of this concept had no ill effect on relativistic electrodynamics or on any other branch of physics is an excellent indication that the concept does not represent a physical phenomenon in the conventional sense.

 

See also:

The Problem With Physics & The Science Delusion

Dogmatic Scientism – The New World Cult

Before Tesla Died, He Never Did Release His Theory of Dynamic Gravity

Jefimenko’s Electrostatic Motors & Heaviside’s Gravitational EM Analogy

What is a Ferrocell? – Seeing Into the Cross Section of the Secret of Mother Nature

There is no Speed of Light

Debunking Relativity

Advertisement

11 thoughts on “Gravity Does Not Exist – The Lorentz Contraction Conundrum

  1. Pingback: Gravity Does Not Exist – The Lorentz Contraction Conundrum – World's Last Chance

  2. J.J.

    Yeah, except that we are able to calculate and measure Gravitational force vs. Magnetic force through space and determine that Gravitational force travel much further than Magnetic force. Explain to me what that force is if not Gravity? I have seen magnetic force not only pull CERTAIN objects but push them as well. Now I have never heard of ANY Gravitational force EVER pushing anything. Also!.. Gravity affects ALL matter evenly and this is how we determine the weight of objects, while Magnetic force varies depending on matter composition. So, explain to me how this Electromagnetic force moves through your (“Ether”) at two separate rates? Explain how the same force can display traits that contradict each other at the same time? Then explain your proof of how and why you know ether exists and functions this way. There are major holes in this logic, not to mention it is poorly explained by someone that probably believes in a flat-earth.
    Ps… It is common practice to provide the correct formula and theorem when blatantly insulting the work of any physicist, let alone Einstein.

    Like

    1. These questions are already answered, did you not pay attention? This isn’t my theory, it’s just the culmination of knowledge from the great scientists and electrical engineers of our past. Tesla was right, Einstein was wrong. Gravity is not a force, and magnetism has never attracted anything, it only displaces. It’s not poorly explained my friend, it’s poorly understood, by someone who probably has never thought for themselves.

      If you want to try and get to grips with dielectrics, please investigate the works of Oleg Jefimenko, Nikola Tesla, Oliver Heaviside, CP Steinmetz, Eric Dollard, Michael Faraday, and even Walter Russell to some degree. All the mathematical calculations you want are between them. Now go do some due diligence.

      I think the problem is you’ve jumped into this article without a prerequisite understanding, and you haven’t paid attention to what’s been said here. Maybe this article will help: https://zeteticzen.wordpress.com/2017/01/30/we-are-not-smart-we-stand-on-the-shoulders-of-giants-the-history-of-electrical-theory/

      Peace.

      Like

    1. That would be “Bismuth”, a chemical element with symbol Bi and atomic number 83. – It’s the most diamagnetic material we know, and holds the record for the longest half life in alpha decay. Bismuth isn’t that expensive compared to some other metals, and it’s pretty easy to cast with, you could make your own bismuth ball if you wanted to.

      Like

      1. VV

        While I appreciate Ken’s work and much of his research is important information, be careful to not lose your OWN mind reciting his videos. Think for yourself.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s