Patterns In Nature – A Case For Intelligent Design

‘Nature geometrizes universally in all her manifestations.’ – H.P. Blavatsky

Humans have always looked upon the beauty, majesty, and ingenuity of the world around them with reverent wonder. The grandeur of the heavens, the regular rhythms of the sun and moon, the myriads of living creatures in all their splendid diversity, the magnificence of a rose flower, a butterfly’s wings or a snow crystal – the idea that all this might be the product of a mindless accident strikes many people as far-fetched. The ancient Greeks aptly called the universe kosmos, a word denoting order and harmony. This underlying order is reflected in many intriguing patterns in nature.

1. Phi and Fibonacci

Consider the line ABC in the following diagram:

Fig. 1.1

Point B divides the line in such a way that the ratio between the longer segment (AB) and the shorter segment (BC) is the same as that between the whole line (AC) and the longer segment (AB). This proportion is known by various names: the golden section, the golden mean, the golden ratio, the extreme and mean ratio, the divine proportion, or phi (φ). If the distance AB equals 1 unit, then BC = 0.6180339887… and AC = 1.6180339887… . The second of these two numbers is the golden section, or phi (sometimes this name is also given to the first number). Many designs in nature are related to the golden section, and it has been widely used in sacred architecture and artwork throughout the ages.

The golden section is an irrational, or transcendental, number, meaning that it never repeats and never ends. It is unique in that its square is produced by adding the number 1 (φ² = φ+1), and its reciprocal by subtracting the number 1 (1/φ = φ-1). (Phi equals (√5+1)/2, the positive root of x² = x+1.) The golden section is the only irrational number that approaches more closely to rationality the higher the power to which it is raised. For instance, φ3000 = 1.0000000000 x 10500.

The golden section is part of an endless series of numbers in which any number multiplied by 1.618 gives the next higher number, and any number multiplied by 0.618 gives the next lower number:

0.090 0.146 0.236 0.382 0.618 1.000 1.618 2.618 4.236 6.854 11.090
φ-5 φ-4 φ-3 φ-2 φ-1 φ0 φ1 φ2 φ3 φ4 φ5

Like phi itself, this series of numbers has many interesting properties:
•  each number is equal to the sum of the two preceding numbers;
•  the square of any number is equal to the product of any two numbers at equal distances to the left and right (e.g. 1.618² = 0.618 x 4.236);
•  the reciprocal of any number to the left of 1.000 is equal to the number the same distance to the right of 1.000 (e.g. 1/0.382 = 2.618).
(To obtain perfectly exact results, the numbers would have to be extended to an infinite number of decimals.)

The large rectangle below is a golden rectangle, meaning that its sides are in the proportion 1.000:1.618. If a square is removed from this rectangle, the remaining rectangle is also a golden rectangle. Continuing this process produces a series of nested golden rectangles. Connecting the successive points where the ‘whirling squares’ divide the sides of the rectangles in golden ratios produces a logarithmic spiral, which is found in many natural forms (see next section). A similar spiral can be generated from a golden triangle (an isosceles triangle whose sides are in the golden ratio), by repeatedly bisecting one of the angles to generate a smaller golden triangle.

Fig. 1.2

Fig. 1.3

    A number series closely related to the golden section is the Fibonacci sequence: it begins with 0 and 1, and each subsequent number is generated by adding the two preceding numbers:

0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987 …

If we take these numbers two at a time, and divide the larger one by the smaller one, the value will oscillate alternately above and below the golden section, while gradually converging on it. If we divide the smaller number by the larger number, the value converges on 1/φ (0.618). (Note that in any series of numbers in which we start with any two ascending numbers and add each consecutive pair to produce the next term, the ratio of successive terms will always tend towards φ.)

1/1 2/1 3/2 5/3 8/5 13/8 21/13 34/21 55/34 89/55 144/89
1.0 2.0 1.5 1.666 1.600 1.625 1.615385 1.619048 1.617647 1.618182 1.617978

    The Fibonacci sequence has many curious features. For example, the sum of any 10 consecutive Fibonacci numbers is always divisible by 11, being equal in fact to 11 times the seventh number. The sum of all Fibonacci numbers from the first to the nth is equal to the (n+2)th number minus 1. Thus the sum of the first 15 numbers (986) is equal to the 17th number (987) minus 1. The square of any term differs by 1 from the product of the two adjacent terms in the sequence: e.g. 3² = 9, 2×5 = 10; 13² = 169, 8×21 = 168. The last digit of any number in the sequence repeats itself with a periodicity of 60: e.g. the 14th number and the 74th number both end in 7. The last two digits (01, 01, 02, 03, 05, 08, 13, 21, etc.) repeat in the sequence with a periodicity of 300. For any number of last digits from three upwards, the periodicity is 15 times ten to a power that is one less than the number of digits, (e.g. for 7 digits it is 15 x 106, or 15 million).

2. Nature’s numbers

Many of nature’s patterns are related to the golden section and the Fibonacci numbers. For instance, the golden spiral is a logarithmic or equiangular spiral – a type of spiral found in unicellular foraminifera, sunflowers, seashells, animal horns and tusks, beaks and claws, whirlpools, hurricanes, and spiral galaxies. An equiangular spiral does not alter its shape as its size increases. Because of this remarkable property (known as self-similarity),* it was known in earlier times as the ‘miraculous spiral’.

*Shapes and forms that look similar under any magnification are known as fractals. Numerous apparently irregular natural phenomena display approximate self-similarity, meaning that similar patterns and details recur at smaller and smaller scales. This applies, for example, to the branching of lightning, rivers, trees, and human lungs. Other fractal objects include the chambered nautilus, a head of cauliflower, coastlines, clouds, snowflakes, and rocks (a magnified rock can look like an entire mountain).

Fig. 2.1 The Whirlpool Galaxy (M51).

Fig. 2.2 Each increment in the length of the nautilus shell is accompanied by a proportional increase in its radius, so that the nautilus does not need to adjust its balance as it matures.

Fig. 2.3 A ram’s heavy corkscrewed horns keep a stable centre of gravity as they grow.

Fig. 2.4 Owing to the structure of their compound eyes, insects such as moths follow an equiangular spiral when drawn towards a candle flame. Peregrine falcons, which have eyes on either side of their heads, follow a similar spiral path when flying at their prey.

Phi can be found in the proportions of the bodies of humans and other creatures, including birds, flying insects, frogs, fish, and horses. The height of a newborn child is divided by the navel into two equal parts (1:1), whereas in adults, the division of the body’s height at the navel yields two parts in the ratio 1:φ, though the navel is usually a little higher in females and a little lower in males. Phi is found in the proportion between the hand and the forearm, and between the upper arm and the hand plus forearm.

Fig. 2.5 Each section of an index finger, from the tip to the base of the wrist, is larger than the preceding one by about 1.618, fitting the Fibonacci numbers 2, 3, 5 and 8.

The DNA molecule measures 34 angstroms long by 21 angstroms wide for each full cycle of the double helix spiral. 34 and 21 are Fibonacci numbers and their ratio closely approximates phi. DNA has two grooves in its spirals, with a phi ratio between the major groove and the minor groove (roughly 21 angstroms to 13 angstroms).

Fig. 2.6

    The Fibonacci numbers and golden section are widely found in the plant kingdom. In nearly all flowers, the number of petals is a Fibonacci number. For instance, lilies have 3 petals, buttercups have 5, many delphiniums have 8, marigolds have 13, asters have 21, and daisies commonly have 13, 21, 34, 55 or 89. Non-Fibonacci numbers don’t occur anything like as often. For instance, very few plants have 4 petals, an exception being the fuchsia. Some plant species are very precise about the number of petals they have, e.g. buttercups, but with others only the average number of petals is a Fibonacci number.

Fig. 2.7 Shasta daisy with 21 petals.

    Fibonacci numbers are often found in the arrangement of branches, leaves, and seeds (phyllotaxis). If we look at a plant from above, the leaves are not arranged directly above one another, but in a way that optimizes their exposure to sun and rain. The Fibonacci numbers occur when counting both the number of times we go around the stem from one leaf to the next, and when counting the number of leaves we meet until we encounter one directly above the starting one. The number of turns in each direction and the number of leaves are usually three consecutive Fibonacci numbers.

In the diagram below, to get from the topmost leaf to the last of the 5 leaves of the plant on the left takes 2 anticlockwise turns or 3 clockwise turns. 2, 3 and 5 are three consecutive Fibonacci numbers. For the plant on the right, it takes 3 anticlockwise rotations or 5 clockwise rotations to pass 8 leaves. Again, 3, 5 and 8 are consecutive Fibonacci numbers. An estimated 90% of all plants display this pattern.

Apple, cherry, apricot,
oak, cypress, poplar
Holly, pear, spruce,
various beans

Fig. 2.8 (by Michael S. Schneider from A Beginner’s Guide To Constructing The Universe)

    Similar arrangements can be found in the scales of a pinecone or the seeds of a sunflower. The florets in the head of a sunflower form two intersecting sets of spirals, one winding clockwise, the other anticlockwise. In some species the number of clockwise spirals is 34, and the number of counterclockwise spirals is 55. Other possibilities are 55 and 89, or 89 and 144. Pineapples have 8 rows of scales sloping to the left, and 13 to the right. Again, these are successive Fibonacci numbers.

Fig. 2.9 Sunflower head.

Fig. 2.10 This pine cone has 13 spirals to the right and 8 to the left.

    The fact that in the arrangement of seeds on flower heads, the numbers of spirals in each direction are nearly always neighbouring Fibonacci numbers means that each seed is roughly 0.618 of a turn from the last one, i.e. there are roughly 1.618 seeds per turn. This results in optimal packing of the seeds, because no matter how big the seed head gets, the seeds are always equally spaced. Similarly, trees and plants tend to have 0.618 leaves or petals per turn. In terms of degrees this is 0.618034 of 360°, which is 222.5°. If we measure the angle going in the opposite direction around the circle, we get: 360 – 222.5 = 137.5°, which is known as the golden angle. The Fibonacci numbers appear in leaf arrangements and the number of spirals on seedheads because they form the best whole-number approximations to the golden section. The higher the numbers are on the Fibonacci sequence, the more closely the golden ratio and the golden angle are approached and the more complex the plant.

3. Pentads and hexads

Fig. 3.1 Each successive pair of heavy lines in this pentagram is in the golden ratio.

    The golden ratio appears in pentagonal forms of symmetry, notably in the five-pointed star (or pentagram), which was the emblem of the Pythagorean brotherhood. Pentagonal symmetry abounds in living organisms, especially plants and marine animals (e.g. starfishes, jellyfishes, sea urchins). Flowers with 5 petals (or multiples of 5) include all fruit blossoms, water lilies, roses, honeysuckles, carnations, geraniums, primroses, orchids, and passionflowers.

Fig. 3.2 Left: Sea cucumber (cross section). Right: Sand dollar (sea urchin).
(by Michael S. Schneider from A Beginner’s Guide To Constructing The Universe)

Fig. 3.3 Pentagonal diatom.

Fig. 3.4 Apple blossoms have five petals, pentagonal indentations are seen at the bottom of the fruit, and cutting an apple in half reveals a star pattern of seeds.

Fig. 3.5 The human body clearly expresses the pentad’s symmetry in its five senses and five extensions from the torso, each limb ending in five fingers or toes. (by Michael S. Schneider from A Beginner’s Guide To Constructing The Universe)

While pentagonal patterns abound in living forms, the mineral world favours twofold, threefold, fourfold, and sixfold symmetry. The hexagon is a ‘close-packing’ shape that allows for maximum structural efficiency. It is very common in the realm of molecules and crystals, in which pentagonal forms are almost never found. Steroids, cholesterol, benzene, TNT, vitamins C and D, aspirin, sugar, graphite – all show sixfold symmetry. The most famous hexagonal architecture is built by bees, wasps, and hornets.

Fig. 3.6 Six water molecules form the core of each snow crystal.

Fig. 3.7 Snow crystals (courtesy of Kenneth G. Libbrecht).

Fig. 3.8 Benzene (C6H6).

Fig. 3.9 Honeycomb.

Fig. 3.10 The facets of a fly’s eyes form a close-packed hexagonal arrangement.

Fig. 3.11 A hexagonal lattice, or honeycomb, of convection
cells (Bénard cells) in a heated liquid.

    The atmosphere of Saturn, one of the four gas giants, circulates around its axis in striped bands. Seen from the poles, the bands generally appear to be circular. But the band nearest the north pole is hexagonal, with sides about 13,800 km long. Unlike other clouds in its atmosphere, it rotates slowly, if at all, relative to the planet. It is one of Saturn’s most enigmatic features.

Fig. 3.12 Saturn’s northernmost hexagonal cloud band. The dark radial lines are artefacts of the way the above images were produced.

4. Platonic solids

A regular polyhedron is a three-dimensional shape whose edges are all of equal length, whose faces are all identical and equilateral, and whose corners all touch the surface of a circumscribing sphere. There are only five regular polyhedra: the tetrahedron (4 triangular faces, 4 vertices, 6 edges); the cube/hexahedron (6 square faces, 8 vertices, 12 edges); the octahedron (8 triangular faces, 6 vertices, 12 edges); the dodecahedron (12 pentagonal faces, 20 vertices, 30 edges); and the icosahedron (20 triangular faces, 12 vertices, 30 edges). In each case, the number of faces plus corners equals the number of edges plus 2. These five polyhedra are also known as the platonic or pythagorean solids, and are intimately connected with the golden section. Their striking beauty is derived from the symmetries and equalities in their relations.

Fig. 4.1 The five platonic solids. The ancients considered the tetrahedron to represent the element of fire; the octahedron, air; the icosahedron, water; and the cube, earth. The dodecahedron symbolized the harmony of the entire cosmos.

Fig. 4.2 An icosahedron’s 12 vertices are defined by three perpendicular golden rectangles. With an edge length of one unit, its volume is 5φ5/6.

The symmetry of the platonic solids leads to other interesting properties. For instance, the cube and octahedron both have 12 edges, but the numbers of their faces and vertices are interchanged (cube: 6 faces and 8 vertices; octahedron: 8 faces and 6 vertices). Similarly, the dodecahedron and icosahedron both have 30 edges, but the dodecahedron has 12 faces and 20 vertices, while for the icosahedron it is the other way round. This allows one solid to be mapped into its dual or reciprocal solid. If we connect the centres of all the faces of a cube, we obtain an octahedron, and if we connect the centres of the faces of an octahedron, we obtain a cube. The same procedure can be used to map an icosahedron into a dodecahedron, and vice versa. (In the Hindu tradition, the icosahedron represents purusha, the male, spiritual principle, and generates the dodecahedron, representing prakriti, the female, material principle.) The tetrahedron is self-dual – joining the four centres of its faces produces another, inverted tetrahedron.


Fig. 4.3

    There are two other ways of passing from dodecahedron to icosahedron, and icosahedron to dodecahedron. If we join interiorly all the vertices of an icosahedron, the lines will intersect at 20 points defining the vertices of a dodecahedron. If we then do the same with the resulting dodecahedron, a smaller icosahedron is generated within it, and so on, ad infinitum. Likewise, if we lengthen the sides of an icosahedron, an enveloping dodecahedron will be formed. Lengthening the sides of the dodecahedron will generate an enveloping icosahedron. Again, this operation can be repeated indefinitely – a fitting symbol of the theosophical teaching of worlds within worlds.

The sum of the angles of the platonic solids is 3600 degrees for the icosahedron, 6480 for the dodecahedron, 1440 for the octahedron, 2160 for the cube, and 720 for the tetrahedron. Each of these numbers is divisible by 9, which means that the sum of the digits is 9 (e.g. 6+4+8=18, 1+8=9). They are also divisible by the canonical numbers 12, 60, 72 and 360. As we shall see, the numerical elements of the five regular polyhedra frequently recur in nature’s cycles.

The platonic solids (especially the tetrahedron, octahedron, and cube) form the basis for the orderly arrangement of atoms in crystals, though the regular dodecahedron and icosahedron are never found.

Fig. 4.4 In salt crystals, the sodium chloride atoms tightly pack along cubic lines of force.

    Tetrahedral geometry commonly occurs in organic and inorganic chemistry and in submicroscopic structures. For example, the methane molecule (CH4) is a tetrahedron, with a carbon atom at its centre and a hydrogen atom at each of its four corners.

Carbon exists in three pure forms. In graphite crystals, the carbon atoms lie in hexagonal sheets, which readily slide off a pencil as we write. In diamond, the hardest substance known, each carbon atom is bonded to four others in a super-strong tetrahedral arrangement. Buckminsterfullerene, the third, highly stable allotrope of carbon, consists of 60 carbon atoms, arranged at the vertices of a truncated icosahedron (i.e. one with its corners cut off).


Fig. 4.5 Graphite; diamond; buckminsterfullerene.

    The great majority of viruses are icosahedral, including the polio virus and the 200 kinds of viruses responsible for the common cold. Icosahedral symmetry is believed to allow for the lowest-energy configuration of particles interacting on the surface of a sphere. The five platonic solids are also found in radiolarian skeletons.

Fig. 4.6 The platonic solids have been found living in the sea. The tetrahedron, somewhat rounded as if from internal pressure, is embodied in a protozoan called Callimitra agnesae, the cube is Lithocubus geometricus, the octahedron Circoporus octahedrus, the dodecahedron Circorrhegma dodecahedrus, and the icosahedron Circognia icosahedrus.

5. Precession and yugas

Due to a slow gyration of the earth’s axis, the spring equinox occurs about 20 minutes earlier each year, when the earth is still about 1/72 of a degree (50 arc-seconds) from the point in its orbit where the previous spring equinox occurred. The vernal equinoctial point therefore moves slowly through the constellations of the zodiac. This key astronomical cycle is known as the precession of the equinoxes. The ancients called it the ‘great year’.

At the average rate of 1/72 of a degree per year, the earth enters a new constellation about every 2160 years, and takes 25,920 years to make a complete circuit of the zodiac. The entry into each new constellation marks the beginning of what is called in theosophy the Messianic cycle, which is said to be marked by the appearance on earth of a spiritual teacher or avatar (lit. a ‘descent’ of divinity); for instance, the commencement of the Piscean age was marked by the appearance of Christ. Interestingly, 2160 is the total number of degrees in the angles of a cube, and if a cube is opened out it forms the shape of a cross, a universal symbol representing the descent of spirit into matter, or the ‘crucifixion’ of spirit in the ‘tomb’ of matter.

The ancient chronological charts of the Brahmans refer to four great cycles or yugas. The krita- or satya-yuga lasts 4000 divine years, the treta-yuga 3000, the dvapara-yuga 2000, and the kali-yuga 1000, a ‘divine year’ being equal to 360 earth-years. Each yuga is introduced by a ‘dawn’ and concluded by a ‘twilight’, each equal to one-tenth of the period of the yuga. The total length of the four yugas in earth-years is therefore 1,728,000 for the satya-yuga, 1,296,000 for the treta-yuga, 864,000 for the dvapara-yuga, and 432,000 for the kali-yuga. The lengths of these four yugas are related in the ratio 4:3:2:1, i.e. they are all multiples of 432,000. If the individual digits of each yuga are added together, the result is always 9 (e.g. 1+2+9+6=18, 1+8=9).

The four yugas together make up one maha-yuga, lasting 4,320,000 years, which in theosophy is said to equal half the evolutionary period of a root-race or ‘humanity’, of which we are now in the fifth. The total life-period of earth, or a day of Brahma, is said to last 1000 maha-yugas or 4,320,000,000 years, and is followed by a rest period, or night of Brahma, of the same length, making a total of 8,640,000,000 years. 360 days and nights make up one year of Brahma, equal to 3,110,400,000,000 ordinary years. 100 years of Brahma make up an age of Brahma, this being the total life-period of our universal solar system, equal to 311,040,000,000,000 years. If we take the precessional cycle of 25,920 years and add to it a dawn and a twilight equal to one-tenth of its length, we get 31,104 – the initial digits of a year and age of Brahma.

4320 is twice 2160, the total number of degrees in a cube, the length of the Messianic cycle, and the average time it takes the equinoctial point to pass through one constellation of the zodiac. 432,000 is equal to 4 x 108,000, and 108,000 years is the average length of an astronomical cycle known as the revolution of the line of apsides. The line of apsides is the line joining that point in the earth’s elliptical orbit where it is closest to the sun (perihelion) and that point where it is furthest from the sun (aphelion). This line turns extremely slowly – by an average of 12 arc-seconds a year – from west to east, and therefore rotates through the whole zodiac in 108,000 years.

The sun has a radius of approximately 432,000 miles (432,475) and a diameter of about 864,000 miles, while the moon has a radius of 1080 miles and a diameter of 2160 miles. Silver, the metal associated with the moon, has an atomic weight of 107.9. In addition, 108 is roughly the average distance between the sun and earth in terms of solar diameters, the average distance between the surfaces of the moon and earth in terms of lunar diameters, and the diameter of the sun in terms of earth diameters (actual figures: 107.5, 108.3, and 109.1 respectively). As a result of these remarkable ‘coincidences’, the moon has the same apparent size as the sun, as seen from earth, and almost exactly covers the disk of the sun during a total solar eclipse.

Fig. 5.1

    According to conventional astronomy, in each precessional cycle the earth’s north pole slowly traces an approximate circle, with an average radius of about 23.5 degrees (the current inclination of its axis), around the north pole of the ecliptic – a point in the constellation Draco perpendicular to the plane of the earth’s orbit around the sun. (According to theosophy, the earth’s axis does not trace a circle but a spiral around the ecliptic poles, as the tilt of the earth’s axis is said to change by four degrees every precessional cycle.)

The ‘circle’ traced by the earth’s axis around the north ecliptic pole is not smooth but wavy, as the moon’s gravitational pull causes the earth to ‘nod’ about once every 18 years (currently 18.6 years), a movement known as nutation. The circle therefore contains about 1440 waves, since 18 x 1440 = 25,920. Note that the average human heartbeat is equal to 72 beats a minute, and on average we breathe about 18 times a minute. 72 years (= 6+60+6 or 6×12) is said to be the ‘ideal’ lifespan of a human being, during which time the sun moves through one degree of the zodiac in the precessional cycle. A human breathes 72 times in 4 minutes, the time required for the earth to turn 1 degree on its axis. In 24 hours (86,400 seconds) we breathe 18 x 1440 = 25,920 times, equal to the number of years in the precessional cycle.

Each human heartbeat takes about 8 tenths of a second. The time-periods occupied by each of the five cardiac phases, reckoned on the basis of one hour, are as follows: auricular systole, 432 seconds; ventricular systole, 1296 seconds; repose of the entire heart, 1728 seconds; diastole, 3024 seconds; and ventricular diastole, 2160 seconds. There are on average 4320 heartbeats in one hour, 8640 beats in 2 hours, 12,960 beats in 3 hours, 17,280 beats in 4 hours, 21,600 beats in 5 hours, and 25,920 beats in 6 hours.* In these figures we can recognize the digits of the four yugas, the Messianic cycle, and the precessional cycle (whose lengths are all multiples of 12, 60, 72, and 360). Thus, again and again we find correspondences between what takes place in the small (the microcosm) and what takes place in the great (the macrocosm) – as above, so below.

*G. de Purucker, Esoteric Teachings, San Diego, California, Point Loma Publications, 1987, 7:20-1.

6. Formative power of sound

In the late 18th century, German physicist Ernst Chladni demonstrated the organizing power of sound and vibration in a visually striking manner. He showed that when sand is scattered on metal plates, and a violin bow is drawn across them, the resulting vibrations cause the particles to move to the places where the plate is almost motionless, producing a variety of beautiful, regular, intricate patterns.*

*Joscelyn Godwin makes an interesting comment on this phenomenon: ‘Once, passing by a crowded dance hall where rock was being played, I could not help perceiving the floor of the hall in terms of a Chladni plate, and the dancers appeared for all the world like the jumping, helplessly manipulated grains of sand’ (1995, p. 246).


Fig. 6.1 Chladni figures. For a video, click here.

    A century after Chladni, Margaret Watts-Hughes created images by placing a powder or liquid on a disk then letting it vibrate to the sound of a sustained musical note. She experimented with several musical instruments but had most success using her voice. The particles arranged themselves into geometric shapes, flower patterns (such as pansies, primroses, geraniums, and roses), or the shape of a fern or a tree. The higher the pitch, the more complex the patterns produced; a powerful sustained note produced an imprint of a head of wheat.

Fig. 6.2 Figures generated by the voice of Margaret Watts-Hughes.

    In the 1950s the study of wave phenomena was continued by Swiss scientist and anthroposophist Hans Jenny (1904-1972), who named the field ‘cymatics’. Using crystal oscillators (which allow precise frequencies and amplitudes to be used), he vibrated various powders, pastes, and liquids, and succeeded in making visible the three-dimensional effects of sound. He produced an astonishing variety of awe-inspiring geometrical and harmonic shapes, including life-like flowing patterns, which he documented in photographs and films.

Jenny, too, found that higher frequencies produced more complex shapes. A low frequency produced a simple central circle surrounded by rings, while a higher frequency increased the number of concentric rings. Even higher frequencies created shapes resembling petals, butterflies, or crustaceans, zebra patterns, mandala-like patterns, and images of the five platonic solids. As the frequency rises, the dissolution of one pattern may be followed by a short chaotic phase before a new, more intricate, stable structure emerges. If the amplitude is increased, the motions become all the more rapid and turbulent, sometimes producing small eruptions. Under certain conditions Jenny was able to make the shapes change continuously, despite altering neither frequency nor amplitude.

Fig. 6.3 Hexagonal pattern produced by light refracting through a small sample of water (about 1.5 cm in diameter) under the influence of vibration. The figure is in constant dynamic motion. (Jenny, 2001, p. 112; courtesy of Jeff Volk)

Fig. 6.4 A round heap of lycopodium powder (4 cm in diameter) is made to circulate by vibration. At the same time two centres of eruption rotate at diametrically opposed points. (Jenny, 2001, p. 108; courtesy of Jeff Volk)

Fig. 6.5 Jenny built a tonoscope to translate the human voice into visual patterns in sand.
Left to right: ‘oh’ sound, ‘ah’ sound, ‘oo’ sound. (Jenny, 2001, p. 65; courtesy of Jeff Volk)

    More recently, Peter Guy Manners found that an acoustic recording of the Crab Nebula caused sand to form a pattern strikingly like the nebula itself. As the near-infrasonic sound was played, the two swirling arms pulled in, forming a tight ball. Towards the end of the audiotape, the sand became very highly compacted and then suddenly exploded, throwing sand off the table.

John’s Gospel begins: ‘In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.’ The Egyptian Book of the Dead, contains a parallel passage: ‘I am the Eternal, I am Ra … I am that which created the Word … I am the Word …’ The Hindu tradition teaches that ‘Nada Brahma’ (the world is sound). The underlying idea is that everything we see is a divine word – or vibration – that has solidified and become manifest, the vibrations originating in the inner, more ethereal realms. All of nature is essentially rhythmic vibration. Everything from subatomic particles to the most intricate lifeforms, from planets to galaxies, comprises resonating fields of pulsating energy in constant interaction. In the poetic words of Cathie Guzzetta:

The forms of snowflakes and faces of flowers may take on their shape because they are responding to some sounds in nature. Likewise, it is possible that crystals, plants, and human beings may be, in some way, music that has taken on visible form. (D. Campbell, ed., Music: Physician for times to come, Quest, 1991, p. 149)

7. Planets and geometry

If we draw a circle representing the earth – which has a mean radius (in round numbers) of 3960 miles – and then draw a square around it, the square will have a perimeter equivalent to 31,680 miles. If we then draw a second circle with a circumference equal to the perimeter of the square, its radius will be 5040 miles (using 22/7 as a good approximation to pi (π), as the ancients often did) – or 1080 miles more than the smaller circle. Just as 3960 miles is the radius of the earth, 1080 miles is the radius of the moon. In other words, the relative dimensions of the earth and moon square the circle!

Fig. 7.1 Earth and moon square the circle. Note that 5040 (the radius of the outer circle) = 1x2x3x4x5x6x7 (known as ‘factorial 7’, also written: 7!) = 7x8x9x10 (or 10!/6!). A quarter of its circumference (also equal to the diameter of the earth-circle) = 7920 = 8x9x10x11 (or 11!/7!), and the area of each semicircle = 11!.

Exactly the same proportions and digits (expressed in feet rather than miles) can be found at Stonehenge (see Michell, 1995, 2001). The outer (sarsen) circle has a mean radius of 50.4 ft and a circumference of 316.8 ft. This is equal to the perimeter of a square drawn round the smaller (bluestone) circle, which has a radius of 39.6 ft. This radius is also equal to the diameter of the circle defined by the inner U-shaped structure. This is clear evidence that the ‘English’ foot and mile are at least as ancient as Stonehenge and, like many other ancient systems of measures, are closely related to the dimensions of earth, moon, and sun.

Fig. 7.2 Ground plan of Stonehenge. The lintels on top of the stones of the outer (sarsen) circle were mortised to the uprights and jointed at their ends, forming what was once a precision-made, perfectly level platform.

Fig. 7.3 Given its slope angle of 51.83°, the Great Pyramid, too, squares the circle. The length of each base side divided by the height equals π/2. In addition, the apothem divided by half the base side equals φ.

Fig. 7.4

    If a tetrahedron is inscribed in a sphere with the apex placed at either pole, the three corners of the base will touch the sphere at a latitude of 19.47 degrees in the opposite hemisphere. This latitude marks the approximate location of major vorticular upwellings of planetary and solar energy. The primary focus of sunspot activity is about 19.5° N and S. On Venus, there are volcanic regions at 19.5° N and 25.0° S. Mauna Loa and Kilauea (Hawaii), Earth’s largest volcanoes, are located at 19.5° and 19.4° N respectively. On the moon there is a mare-like lava extrusion at 19.6° S. On Mars, Olympus Mons, possibly the largest volcano in the solar system, is located at 19.3° N. The Great Red Spot of Jupiter is located at 21.0° S. On Saturn there are storm belts at 20.0° N and S. On Uranus, there are upwellings causing cooler temperatures at 20.0° N and S, and a dark spot at about 22.5° S. The Great Dark Spot of Neptune, photographed by Voyager 2 in 1989, was located at 20.0° S, but when the Hubble Space Telescope viewed the planet in 1994, the spot had vanished – only to be replaced by a dark spot at a similar location in the northern hemisphere.

Fig. 7.5 Jupiter’s Great Red Spot.

8. Planetary distances

Are the planets of our solar system located at random distances from the sun? The Titius-Bode law, discovered 1766, suggests they are not. The law is obtained by writing down first 0, then 3, and then doubling the previous number: 6, 12, 24, etc. If 4 is added to each number and the sum divided by 10, the resulting numbers give the mean distances of the orbits of the planets in astronomical units (1 AU = the earth’s mean distance from the sun). Uranus, discovered in 1781, fitted the law, as did Ceres, the largest asteroid between Mars and Jupiter, discovered in 1801. However, the law breaks down completely for Neptune and Pluto, which were discovered later. Various efforts have been made to modify the Titius-Bode law to make it more accurate.*

*William R. Corliss, The Sun and Solar System Debris, Sourcebook Project, 1986, pp. 34-42.

What the Titius-Bode law essentially means is that planetary orbits become progressively greater by a ratio of approximately 2:1 (the ratio of the octave) with increasing distance from sun. This is brought out in columns 3 and 4 of the table below, in which half the distance between Mercury and Earth is taken as the unit of measurement. Uranus and Pluto have mean orbits close to the exact distances necessary to complete two further octaves. Neptune is located almost exactly half-way between Uranus and Pluto, as though to fill in the half-octave position. This may indicate that it was not an original member of the solar system (theosophy says it was captured from outside our solar system). Likewise, the Titius-Bode law works for Pluto if we ignore Neptune.

Mean distance of the planets from the sun
Planet Calculated
according to
Titius-Bode law
(in AU)
(in AU)
Perfect octaves
in units of
distance from
Actual units
of distance
from Mercury
Mercury 0.4 0.387 0 0
Venus 0.7 0.723 1 1.1
Earth 1.0 1.000 2 2
Mars 1.6 1.524 4 3.7
Asteroid belt
2.8 2.767 8 7.8
Jupiter 5.2 5.203 16 15.7
Saturn 10.0 9.539 32 29.9
Uranus 19.6 19.191 64 61.4
Neptune 38.8 30.061 (64×1.5=96) (96.8)
Pluto 77.2 39.529 128 127.7

Due to its ad-hoc nature, the Titius-Bode law is usually dismissed as a numerical coincidence that has no physical basis. However, the fact that the planets’ distances from the sun follow a pattern can easily be demonstrated by plotting the logarithm of the mean distance of the planets (including the asteroid belt) against their sequential number (1 to 10). The fact that all the points lie very nearly on a straight line proves that gravitation is ‘quantized’. However, there is currently no detailed mainstream theory that explains how gravity works and why it should be quantized. The orbits of satellites around moons show the same quantized spacing, as do the orbits of electrons around an atomic nucleus (in the Bohr model of the atom).

Fig. 8.1
Figs. 8.1 to 8.6 courtesy of John Martineau (A Little Book of CoincidenceWooden Books, 2001)

    Curiously, the mean orbital radii of the four inner and four outer planets reflect about the asteroid belt. For instance, if we multiply together the orbital radii of Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Uranus, we get virtually the same value as multiplying the orbital radii of Mercury, Earth, Saturn, and Neptune (5.51 x 1034 km as against 5.56 x 1034 km).

The spacing of the planets shows many geometrical regularities. For example:

Fig. 8.2 Three circles touching: if Mercury’s mean orbit passes through the centres of the three circles, Venus’ orbit encloses the figure (99.86% accuracy).


Fig. 8.3 Left: The mean orbits of Mars and Jupiter can be drawn from four touching circles or a square (99.995%). Right: A related pattern spaces Earth’s and Mars’ orbits (99.8%).

Fig. 8.4 In this diagram, the smaller and larger circles represent not only the relative sizes but also the orbits of Mercury and Earth; they are related by a pentagram (99.1%).

Fig. 8.5 This diagram shows Earth’s and Saturn’s relative sizes and orbits;
they are related by a 15-pointed star (99.3%).


Fig. 8.6 Earth’s and Jupiter’s mean orbits can be created by spherically nesting three cubes, or three octahedra, or any threefold combination of them (99.89%).

9. Solar system harmonies

The 17th-century astronomer Johannes Kepler discovered a remarkable relationship between a planet’s mean distance from the sun and the time it takes to orbit the sun: the ratio of the square of a planet’s period of revolution (T) to the cube of its mean distance (r) from the sun is always the same number (T²/r³ = constant). For instance, measuring T in earth-years and r in astronomical units, we get:

 = 1.0002
 = 1.0000
 = 1.0000
 = 0.9991

Orthodox science has no real explanation for this, or for the many ‘resonances’ in solar system dynamics. For instance, the periods of Jupiter and Saturn show a 2:5 ratio. The periods of Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto stand in a 1:2:3 ratio. Mars and Jupiter are locked into a 1:12 resonance, Saturn and Uranus are in a 3:1 resonance, and there is a 2:3 resonance between Mercury’s rotational and orbital periods.

What is the nature of such ‘resonances’? Abstract mathematical concepts such as ‘curved spacetime’ shed no light on the matter. A concrete explanation must be sought in the behaviour of the dynamic ether filling space, whose vorticular motions cause the planets and stars to rotate and carry them along in their respective orbits. According to the ether-science model known as aetherometry, T²/r³ is a constant for all the planets because it refers to the constant flux of energy that the solar system as a whole extracts by its primary gravitational interaction with the ether, entailing a nearly constant energy supply for each of its members.

The speeds of the planets in their orbits represent their pitch-frequencies. Cosmic ‘chords’ are produced when planets come into conjunction (or ‘kiss’), i.e. stand in a straight line with the earth and sun. A certain number of regular planetary conjunctions occur over particular periods of time, and the ratios between these numbers reflect with considerable accuracy the length ratios necessary to produce the diatonic notes of an octave, i.e. the seven notes of a musical scale.

Fig. 9.1 Planetary conjunctions as ‘chords’ (Tame, 1984, p. 239).
The line in this diagram represents an octave, divided into seven intervals by eight notes. The line could represent the string of a one-stringed musical instrument. The numbers above the line are the numbers of conjunctions of each planet with the sun and earth, and those below the line are the numbers of years involved.

The planets’ orbits are ellipses with the sun at one of their foci. Their speeds are therefore variable: they speed up as they approach perihelion (the point in their orbit nearest the sun) and slow down as they approach aphelion (their greatest distance from the sun). Following Kepler, Francis Warrain expressed the ratio between the minimum and maximum speeds of one planet and those of different planets as a musical interval. The results (only those for the inner planets are given below) rule out chance altogether, and constitute ‘a powerful argument for the harmonic arrangement of the solar system’ (Godwin, 1995, pp. 132-6). Of 74 tones, as many as 58 belong to the major triad CEG.

Harmonies of the planets’ angular velocities, as seen from the sun
Harmonic number
1 9 5 3 25 27 15 2
Mars aphelion (l)
perihelion (m)
l:m = 2:3
l:n = 9:20
l:o = 5:12
m:n = 2:3
m:o = 3:5






Earth aphelion (n)
perihelion (o)
n:o = 15:16
n:p = 3:5
n:q = 3:5
o:p = 5:8
o:q = 5:8
B C’


Venus aphelion (p)
perihelion (q)
p:q = 24:25
p:r = 5:9
p:s = 1:4


D E G G#


Mercury aphelion (r)
perihelion (s)
q:r = 16:27
q:s = 81:320
r:s = 9:20



The time taken by Venus to seemingly orbit the Earth (i.e. a Venus synod) is currently 584 days, so that 5 Venus synods are equivalent to 8 ‘practical’ earth-years (of 365 days). Venus has a sidereal orbital period of 225 days, and 13 of these periods equal 8 practical earth-years. In both cases, the numbers composing these ratios are consecutive Fibonacci numbers, and therefore give approximations to the golden section: 8/5 = 1.6, and 13/8 = 1.625. Venus rotates extremely slowly on its axis: its day lasts 243 earth-days, or 2/3 of an earth-year (the same ratio as a musical fifth). Every time Venus and earth ‘kiss’, Venus does so with the same face looking at earth. Over the 8 years of the 5 kisses, Venus will have spun on its own axis 12 times in 13 of its years.

Thus, in 8 years Venus has 5 inferior conjunctions (when it lies between earth and sun) and 5 superior conjunctions (when it lies on the opposite side of the sun). Plotting either of these sets of 5 conjunctions in relation to the zodiac produces a five-pointed star or pentagram, the segments of the constituent lines being related according to the golden section. There is a slight irregularity, for the pentagram is not completely closed, there being a difference of two days at the top. This irregularity generates a further cycle, as it means that the pentagram will rotate through the whole zodiac in a period of about 1200 years. It is interesting to note that the pentagram was associated with the Babylonian goddess Ishtar-Venus, and that depictions of Venus as a five-pointed star have also been found at Teotihuacan in Mexico. In theosophy, Venus is said to be closely connected with our higher mind (manas), the fifth principle of the septenary human constitution.

Fig. 9.2 Teotihuacan: stellar symbol of Venus dispensing its influence
downwards towards the earth.

Fig. 9.3 The Venus pentagram.

    According to theosophy, the key numbers to the solar system lie in a combination of the year of Saturn and the year of Jupiter, expressed in earth-years (Purucker, 1973, pp. 3-15). About 12 earth-years (11.86) make 1 year of Jupiter, and about 30 earth-years (29.46) make 1 year of Saturn: 12 x 30 = 360, the number of degrees in a circle and the number of days in an ideal earth-year. (Theosophy says that an earth-year oscillates above and below 360 days over very long periods of time.)

The whole process of evolution can be summed up as a descent of divine consciousness-centres or monads into matter, and their subsequent re-ascent to spirit, enriched by the experience gained on their aeons-long evolutionary journey. This process can be symbolized by two interlaced triangles, known as Solomon’s seal or the sign of Vishnu, the upward-pointing triangle representing spirit, and the downward-pointing triangle representing matter. Significantly, as Saturn and Jupiter revolve around the sun, they mark out two interlaced triangles around us every 60 years! The upward triangle is formed by their conjunctions and the downward triangle by their oppositions. Once again, there is a slight irregularity: after 60 years the conjunction does not take place at exactly the same point; there is a gap of 8 degrees, so that the interlaced triangles slowly rotate through the entire zodiac in a period of 2640 years. There are 432 of these 60-year Jupiter/Saturn cycles in a precessional cycle of 25,920 years.

Fig. 9.4 Conjunctions and oppositions of Jupiter and Saturn.

    The sun is the heart and brain of the solar kingdom and the regular sunspot cycle is akin to a solar heartbeat. The sunspot cycle has a major impact on earth, especially terrestrial magnetism and the climate. Over the past 250 years its length has varied irregularly between 9 and 14 years, averaging 11.05 years. Sunspots peak shortly after Jupiter passes the point in its orbit closest to the sun. (The ‘ideal’ sunspot cycle is said in theosophy to be 12 years, so there would be one such cycle for each year of Jupiter.) The sunspot maximum does not occur exactly in the middle of the sunspot cycle. The ascending part of the cycle has a mean length of 4.3 years – very close to the figure of 4.22 years that would divide the 11.05-year cycle exactly according to the golden section.*

*Theodor Landscheidt, ‘Solar activity: a dominant factor in climate dynamics’,

10. Intelligent habits

To attribute the order, harmonious proportions, and marvellous recurring patterns in nature to pure chance is absurd. The pagan philosopher Cicero wrote:

If anyone cannot feel the power of God when he looks upon the stars, then I doubt whether he is capable of feeling at all. From the enduring wonder of the heavens flows all grace and power. If anyone thinks it is mindless then he himself must be out of his mind. (On the Nature of the Gods, Penguin Classics, 1972, 2.55)

However, the traditional theological picture of ‘God’ as a supreme selfconscious being who thinks, plans, and creates – even managing to make the entire universe out of nothing – is untenable. If ‘he’ is a being, he must be finite and limited, and have a relative beginning and end. Whereas if the divine is infinite, it cannot be a thinking being, separate from the universe, but must be one with it, as taught by pantheism. The divine essence would then be synonymous with boundless space, or infinite consciousness-life-substance. And since nothing can come from nothing, it must always have existed.

Materialistic scientists prefer to attribute the patterned order of the cosmos to ‘laws of nature’, with new ones emerging ‘spontaneously’ as evolution proceeds. But this explains nothing, for the word ‘law’ simply denotes the regular operations of nature – the very regularities that the term is supposed to explain! Patterns in the living world are sometimes attributed to genetic programmes, but this is merely a declaration of faith, since all that genes are known to do is provide the code for making proteins – not for arranging them into complex structures. Moreover, it is hard to swallow the conventional claim that genetic programmes themselves originated by chance.

If some patterns arose through random genetic mutations and natural selection, it would mean, for example, that the reason the golden angle is widely found in leaf arrangements throughout the plant kingdom is because it contributed to their survival. This implies that at one time most plant species did not embody the golden angle – but such a claim can never be tested. What we do know is that life emerged on earth incredibly quickly, that new and fully functional types of organisms have tended to appear on earth incredibly quickly, and that there is no evidence whatsoever for vast periods of trial-and-error experimentation along darwinian lines.

The theosophic tradition, or ancient wisdom, teaches that nature’s patterns and regularities are better seen as habits, an expression of its ingrained instinctual behaviour, of the tendency for natural processes to follow grooves of action carved in countless past cycles of evolution. For it teaches that all worlds, on every conceivable scale, reembody again and again. And behind these habits lies an all-pervading consciousness, the universe being composed of interworking hierarchies of intelligent and semi-intelligent ‘beings’ or energy-forms, from elemental to relatively divine. The order of nature also reflects the essential interconnectedness of all things, and the fact that the same basic patterns and processes recur on widely different scales.

All monads, or units of consciousness, are said to progress through a series of kingdoms towards a state of relative perfection in the system of worlds in which they are then evolving, before passing, after a long rest, into other world systems, on other planes. Humans, in their present stage of rebellious selfconsciousness, often succumb to the temptation to misuse their free will for selfish and shortsighted ends, creating discord and suffering. But it lies within our power to attune ourselves to the fundamental harmony of our inner, spiritual selves – sparks of the universal ‘Self’ – and to become voluntary coworkers with nature in the great cosmic adventure of evolution.

Gravity Does Not Exist – The Lorentz Contraction Conundrum


There is no such thing as gravity, dielectric acceleration IS (so called) magnetic attraction and IS (so called) gravity. It is one and the same thing, the only difference is coherency.

A magnet is a coherent and polarized object, any spatial extrapolation is polarization necessitatively. What drives a magnet is point non-specific and no different from any other holographic fractal in that respect. It is field incommensurability. A magnet does not have poles it has the inverse of counter-space. Space is the absence of inertia, it has no properties. Space acts on nothing, time acts on nothing. A field in and of itself has no quantity, no physicality, it is not phenomena. Space is a posterior attribute of a field, therefore it does nothing and acts on nothing. Space and Time are not autonomous forces, this is absurd. Modern science has never adequately defined polarity, or quantified a field for that matter.

“A magnet has 2 poles” is a description not an explanation. The loss of inertia necessitates polarity. The rest point in the centre is a result of pressure mediation. It is concentrated there because it is the inverse of space (force and motion) it is counter-space (inertia and acceleration). What we call a magnetic field is a reciprocating precessional hyperboloid resultant of a coherent dielectric object. Electricity is the multiplicative byproduct OF Phi (magnetism) and Psi (dielectricity).

The 800 pound gorilla that shits on the head of modern physics and QM and that is going to turn the world upside down with countless new inventions MUST be and WILL be in dielectrics, not electricity. Classical magnetism does not account for the difference between centripetal convergence and centrifugal divergence and how they interact to cause dielectric voidance or counter-voidance (magnetic vectorization). Which is often incorrectly labelled as magnetic attraction/repulsion.

There is no need for a unified field theory; all fields are already unified. What is not unified is human comprehension of the nature of field modalities in relationship to one another. Mother Nature does not do math and complex calculations with virtual particles. The conjugate forces of reality are simplex and have been understood since ancient times, albeit foolishly dismissed by the arrogance of modern society.

Gravity is left entirely undefined and lacks a scientific denotation in principle, ergo the term is nothing other than a pseudoforce and you may as well say unicorn farts or pixie dust interchangeably. It makes no difference. DESCRIPTIONS ARE NOT EXPLANATIONS!

To summarize, gravity is incoherent dielectric centripetal acceleration towards a null-point of counter-spatial inertia. Essentially a hybrid field modality and byproduct of electromagnetism to put it in layman’s terms. Nothing more.

uni field modalities final final one 0

Proof masses do not accelerate towards each other:


Magnetism never attracted anything, it only displaces. When two magnets collide they do not attract towards each other directly but to a a void or counter-spatial null point of inertia between them. 




In regards to atomist relativity theory;

There are no discrete particles in the universe and certainly none that mediate charges, discharges, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation, only fields, all modalities of the Ether. The so-called ‘electrons’ are not particles, not objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle of discharge, and are certainly not charge-carriers, fields are not particles, are not “electrons”, nor assuredly are there energy discharges in the vacuum of space involving ‘electrons’; the ‘electron’ is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even more faulty mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, or an Atomist.

Electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization; magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge; dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether give rise to electrification. Phi times Psi gives Q; ‘electrons’ do not mediate these electrical and magnetic forces or likewise the Ether fields.

There is a widespread belief that individual Lorentz – Einstein transformation equations have a physical significance of their own and can be used independently of each other. Thus, for example, some authors believe that for transforming the electric field of a parallel-plate capacitor or of a line charge from one reference frame to another it is sufficient to use only the charge-density transformation equation. Similarly, some authors believe that the same seemingly correct results can be obtained by using just the electric and magnetic field transformation equations. An analysis of field expressions obtained by means of such transformation methods shows, however, that these expressions are incorrect. In order to obtain correct expressions for electric and magnetic fields by means of Lorentz – Einstein transformation equations, the equations must be used collectively, so that all transformable quantities in the system under consideration are properly transformed.

These and similar errors in the understanding of relativistic concepts and equations frequently result in incorrect representations of physical phenomena and in various relativistic “paradoxes” that have caused some scientists to criticize and even to reject relativity theory as such.

The answer is simple: As a physical phenomenon the relativistic (kinematic) Lorentz contraction does not exist. And the fact that several revisions of this concept had no ill effect on relativistic electrodynamics or on any other branch of physics is an excellent indication that the concept does not represent a physical phenomenon in the conventional sense.


See also:

The Problem With Physics & The Science Delusion

Dogmatic Scientism – The New World Cult

Before Tesla Died, He Never Did Release His Theory of Dynamic Gravity

Jefimenko’s Electrostatic Motors & Heaviside’s Gravitational EM Analogy

What is a Ferrocell? – Seeing Into the Cross Section of the Secret of Mother Nature

There is no Speed of Light

Debunking Relativity

The Ophanic Alphabet – 3D Enochian Toroidal Script

In Part One, we analyzed four key versions of the Ophanic alphabet and discovered the significant impact that seemingly small changes can have upon alphabetic forms.

When one is finally prepared to understand the nature of the Ophanic system, it will be tremendously valuable to work with the Ophanic letters within context. “Understanding Ophanic” means to completely immerse oneself within the letters. Fourteen years ago, in 1995, through the very process of creating the elemental tablets and all the other furniture associated with the Enochian system, I received many crucial insights.

Especially worthy of mention is what unfolded during the process of embroidering the Ophanic letters onto red cloth for the Holy Table. Using golden thread, I worked intimately with my fingers.  To ensure I placed my needle accurately, I was forced to slow my pace. While it takes only seconds to reproduce a symbol with a writing implement, it takes many untold hours of intense focus to duplicate the form using needle and thread. So the process of sewing letters by hand was very tedious.

As I became accustomed to a much slower, more methodical cadence, something amazing happened.  Time and timing became crucial. As my work progressed, I became aware that I instinctively sewed with natural regularity at a measured pace which began to syncopate with the rhythmical pattern of larger cycles, expanding my awareness and connecting me with what I can only describe as Universal Mind. Working intimately with symbolic forms in this way also tapped me directly into my right brain processes. As a result, I developed a more powerful sensitivity to spatial relationships and my perspective broadened.

If the very process of working with the Ophanic letters increases one’s sensitivity to tempo, time and space, there has to a reason. To uncover the deeper meaning inherent within the Ophanic letterforms is to fathom the larger patterns at work. The purpose of Part Two of this article is to uncover and discover what kind of patterns can be discerned and what kind of meaning can be inferred from those patterns.

Deriving Meaning through Classical Geometry

Because geometric structures create our world, we can say the foundation of geometry is the universal expression of shape. Different geometric shapes give rise to unique patterns of vibration and resonances within the greater whole. Sacred geometry is a mathematically precise dynamic that organizes matter to take coherent form in space. The study of sacred geometry teaches us to appreciate proportional relationships and allows us to recognize the spatial dynamic of the parts to the whole (refer to Section Four of The Ophanic Revelation book: Basic Ophanic Geometry).

If we divide every letter into their constituent parts and examine each part’s seed forms from John Dee’s perspective, what secrets will be revealed? Applying classical geometric canons that were familiar to Dee to interpret the meaning of each separate shape may prove to be quite edifying.

As in geometry, we begin with one of the simplest geometric concepts: the point. With no length or width, a point specifies an exact location within a given space. Consisting of neither volume, area, length, nor any other higher dimensional analogue, a point is a 0-dimensional object, symbolized by a small dot. The dot represents the beginning, the origin point, the center from which everything is measured.  A dot comprises part of the Enochian letters X and Y.

point A straight line connects two points via the shortest path, extending forever in both directions.  However, a line segment comprises only the part of a line between two points. The Ophanic characters that employ the use of a long horizontal straight line are: C, E, I, Y and Q. Symbolically, a horizontal line implies the horizon which is associated with open possibilities, fresh opportunities and new beginnings.

ophan 2 A straight vertical line carries with it the connotation of ascension and strength. Moving upward towards heaven, Enochian letters with vertical stems are: E, I, Q, Y and Z. Like a tree, a column, or human spine reaching in both directions down to the ground and up to the sky, a vertical line symbolizes life and growth. Within his tome, Monas Hieroglyphica, John Dee wrote (Theorem II):

ophan 3

The circle without a straight line cannot be artificially created, nor a straight line without a point. Consequently, everything, properly, began from the point and the monad. And whatever is strived for by the periphery of the circle, no matter how big it is, can in no way succeed without the ministry of the central point.[1]

ophan 4 Our “line” category also includes the Enochian letters with straight components oriented upon a diagonal, like A, B, F, parts of L and D.

Through association, these letters anticipate the first geometric figure: the triangle.

ophan 5Straight Enochian letters like E, Q and Y that have both horizontal and vertical elements which connect at right angles also have three points: the beginning point, the ending point and the point of intersection in the middle. Even though the third side would be invisible, the form suggests the geometric figure of a right triangle. Three points also suggest the three-dimensional concept of a plane in space. Inherent within the triangle is the numerical symbolism of three, the nature of which expresses itself in the concept of the triad, or trinity-past/present/future; man/woman/child; thesis/synthesis/antithesis; virgin/mother/crone, mind/ body/ spirit; etc… and can be understood as a key to creativity, versatility and expression.

ophan 6When two lines intersect at an angle of 90° and share a common point, the figure of a cross is created. The cross connotes balance–the connection between heaven and earth, male and female, positive and negative and other polar opposites. According to Dee, the “Cross is the hieroglyphic sign of perfection.” A and N are the two Enochian letters which include elements composing an equilateral cross. In Theorem XVI within his Monas Hieroglyphica, Dee wrote:

ophan 7

At this point in the discussion of our proposition we must philosophize a little concerning the CROSS. Although our CROSS is composed of two straight lines (as we said), and the lines are of equal length, they do not divide each other into equal lengths. But in the mystical arrangement of our cross we wanted to have both equal and unequal parts, to affirm that in the power of two lines divided in this manner is hidden also (because they are equal in size) the virtue of an equilateral CROSS. For, a certain JUSTICE of NATURE very generally requires that a CROSS is to be drawn with equal straight lines, and in the dividing of the lines cross-ways [that is, in the form of an ‘X’] its lines ought to be equal to begin with.

As described above, Dee dissected the cross into two units. The letters conforming to the way Dee divided the cross is the Latin “L” and the Enochian E, both equal and opposite.

Traditionally, the cross is a 4-sided orientation in space and represents the four basic forces of spin in the universe. We may also call the active forces which move outward, “yang,” and the receptive force drawing inwards, “yin.” Feminine energy is both receptive and active, the latter within the former. Masculine energy is both active and receptive. When the cross is placed within a circle, it becomes the traditional symbol for earth.

Following are Dee’s comments regarding the cross and the four elements (Theorem VII):

The elements that are removed from their natural seats and whose homogeneous parts are scattered, will teach experimenters that the elements naturally return to their places by means of straight lines. Thus it will not be absurd [to say] that the secret of the FOUR ELEMENTS (into which all elementary things can in the end be dissolved) is affirmed by means of 4 straight lines that expand from a single and indivisible point into 4 opposite directions. Here you will carefully note what the Geometers teach: a LINE is produced from the FLOWING OF A POINT. And using this same principle, we point out that this is also the case in our mechanical magic, because the lines indicating our elements are produced by the continuous fall of DROPS (which are like physical points) [moving] as though they are FLOWING.”

ophan 8Also symbolizing the earth, stability, and foundation is the square. The Ophanic letter form closest to the square, or at least the letter enclosing space with uncurved lines on three sides, would be Q (Q).

ophan9The circle is an ancient and universal symbol for oneness, wholeness, unity, completion and sacred space. The strokes and counter spaces of many Enochian letters—B, G, D, H, L, M, N, P, R, Z—are circular in nature. Dee relates the nature of the circle to that of the sun and writes about the line and the circle in Theorem I:

By means of the straight line and the circle, the first and simplest production and representation of things was made in the light, as were non-existent things and those that are hidden behind the veil of Nature.

ophan10 In Theorem IV, Dee relates the semi-circle to the moon:


Although the semi-circle of the moon is above the Sun, as it were, and comes first, nevertheless the Moon regards the SUN as lord and king; the Moon even seems to rejoice over the sun’s form and vicinity, since the Moon, in one way, emulates the size of the Sun’s radius (or so it appears to the ordinary person) and in another way the moon constantly turns its light toward the Sun. And finally, the Moon so desires to be filled by the SUN’S rays, that it, so to speak, transforms into the Sun and disappears completely from the sky, until it appears again after a few days in the form of a little horn, exactly as we have depicted it.

ophan12Lastly, there are curved elements that can best be described as Arcs. An arc is a portion of the circumference of a circle. Those Enochian letters composed primarily of arcs are O, T, S but arcs also appear in B, C, D, F, M, N, R and U.

ophan13 The arc represents an unfolding of that which is hidden or the promise of something greater. For instance, a rainbow is a colored arc. As symbols, arcs have traditionally been classified as either ascending or descending. The descending arc (downward or shadowy arc) represents an involution of spirit whereas the ascending arc (upward or luminous arc) represents an evolution of spirit. Spirit and matter are fundamentally of one essence only they are at different developmental stages. For our purposes here, the arc represents being in a state of development.

ophan14Arcs could also be considered as parts of the spiral, our final geometric figure. Among the many Ophanic letters that have spiral-shaped components are G, H, M, and R. Spirals are associated with the cycles of time and nature. The spiral shows up in the pattern of seeds in a sunflower, in the growing tips of ferns, in the pattern that leaves grow on a stem, in the shape of a nautilus shell, and, as a helix, the shape of the DNA molecule. As a symbol, the spiral represents a spiritual journey, the evolutionary process of growing and learning.

ophan15Thus, every one of our 21 Ophanic letters contains some reflection of the basic building blocks of the universe. Meaning can be derived from reading the symbols in conjunction. For instance, the letter B read from right to left can be interpreted thus to mean: the sphere of the Moon (semi-circle) descends into the physical (arc) to express itself dynamically (diagonal line). Put another way, the unconscious processes represented by the moon manifests itself through creative expression. Thus, through the action of creativity, the first letter designated by the angelic beings, B, unlocks and opens a doorway.

What other stories may be hidden within the component parts of the rest of the alphabet?

Moving Beyond the Point, Line and Cross

In our journey of discovery, comparing the Ophanic letters against classic geometric canons moved us a good distance from our starting point.  But there are other ways to cultivate meaning besides chopping up the Ophanic letters. If we regard the letters as a collective of interrelated units, it’s possible to uncover the hidden geometric relationships between number, proportion, and pattern.

The angel Raphael introduced the Ophanic alphabet in a very specific, peculiar, but important order.  In Quinti Libri Mysteriorum Dee reports that after dictating the letters by name, that “there cam two lines and parted the 21 letters into 3 partes, eche being of 7.” In other words, moving right to left, the angel divided the letters into 3 rows containing 7 letters each. Raphael then pronounces: “The Number, O most perfect, One and Threefold, Glory be to you.”[2]

The importance of this particular sequence has been the subject of much speculation.  However, easy answers have never been forthcoming, even up to the present time.  In 2007, a Nottingham University English scholar, Martin Findell, decided to try his hand at deciphering the mystery and noted the following:

The division of the alphabet into three produces another noteworthy feature which might be the result of deliberate organization. Within each group of 7 letters there is one which occupies the same ordinal position in both the Roman and angelic alphabets. These are D (group 1, position 4), I (group 2, position 2), and U (group 3, position 5). These three letters together spell the Latin word diu “by day; for a long time”. If the pattern is intentional, diu could perhaps be a reference to the coming of the day of redemption after long ages of mankind’s suffering; though this connection is tenuous at best. A more promising alternative would be to construe the “stationary” letters as D and the Roman numeral IV – D being the fourth letter not only of the Roman and angelic alphabets, but also of the Greek and Hebrew; and, of course, Roman D is homophonous with the philosopher’s name.[3]

But after pursuing several areas of inquiry, Findell ultimately gives up:

Entertaining as it is to speculate that these letters (DIU) form a key to the ordering of the alphabet, I have had no success in identifying any way to use this hypothetical key to link the 7-letter groups either to one another or to their corresponding groups in the Roman alphabet. If the patterns identified here are genuinely involved in the construction of the angelic alphabet (and I doubt that this is the case), I am forced to admit defeat, at least for the time being, in my efforts to determine the method used.[4]

The author then concludes that the alphabet, having emerged from Kelley’s subconscious,  would bear striking similarities to other known alphabets without possessing any coherent structure of its own and that there is no meaning to be deciphered.  My own conclusion is simply that the pattern has yet to be discovered.

ophan16The Magic Seven

Whatever the Ophanic pattern may be, it prominently involves the number seven.  Associated with the number seven are many interesting things: the 7 days in a week, the 7 planets in astrology, the 7 metals of alchemy said to be governed by 7 angelic intelligences; not to mention, of course, the 7 deadly sins. So I’ve become extremely sensitive to sevens.

Synchronously, during the writing of this article, I encountered an image (redrawn left) which gave me pause.  I had seen images of piano keys before, only this time I recognized the numbers 5, 7, and 12 as very meaningful. Suddenly, the idea occurred to me that our three groups of seven letters could simply be indicating the levels of three octaves. Since I know next to nothing about musical notation, I had to quickly familiarize myself with the basics.

The best explanation I found of how the number 7 relates to an octave (8) in music came from Douglas Hofstadter’s Metamagical Themas:

On a piano there are twelve notes (some black, some white) from any note to the corresponding note one octave away. Playing them all in order creates a chromatic scale, as contracted with the more familiar diatonic scales (usually major or minor). These latter involve only seven notes apiece (the 8th note being the octave itself). The seven intervals between the successive notes of a diatonic scale are not all equal. Some are twice as large as others, yet to the ear there is a perfect intuitive logic to it. Rather paradoxically, in fact, most people can sing a major scale without any trouble, uneven intervals notwithstanding, but few can sing a chromatic scale accurately, even though it “ought” to be much more straightforward-or so it would seem, since all its intervals are exactly the same size. The chromatic scale is so called because the extra notes  it introduces to fill-up the gaps in a diatonic scale have a special kind of “bite” or sharpness to them that adds color or piquancy to a piece. For that reason, a piece filled with notes other than the seven notes belonging to the key it is in is said to be chromatic.[5]

An octave comprises seven fundamental notes: do-re-mi-fa-sol-la-ti. The eighth note, do, is a repeat of the first but with the pitch frequency doubled.  It is also the first note of the second octave. Accordingly, the eighth note of the second octave–again, do –is the first note of the third. Comparing the musical notes on the diatonic scale, to the letter arrangements, each row of letters represents one octave. The letters in each column and row bear a unique relationship to one another in terms of their mathematical properties.

ophan17Some appealing arithmetic principles correlate with the particular geometric arrangement of three septenaries. William S.  Burkle refers to this arrangement as the “3 X 7 tableaux” and illustrates a number of interesting mathematical phenomena [6]. For instance, when the numeric of any two vertically adjacent numbers in any given row are subtracted, the difference equals seven. When the values of first and last numbers in each row are subtracted from the central number in that same row, the difference is always three.  Furthermore, the numbers in the center row will have a value equal to the mean of the two numbers immediately above and below. There are many more examples of this strange interactive influence between the geometric arrangement of the numbers and simple arithmetic. If John Dee knew about the mathematical properties of the 3 x 7 tableaux, he would have appreciated their simple elegance.

What is pertinent to our discussion is that Burkle also reveals the little-known correspondences of the 3 x 7 tableaux to musical notes. Apparently, Paul Foster Case as well as some members of the Golden Dawn figured out the relationship of the Tarot trumps to music. Since only the pattern is my primary interest, I freely adopt this model as a starting point. But before we proceed, let’s first consider the 3/7/12 system of modal music as it pertained to music in the 15th century:

;We complete our assessment … by investigating the other worldwide esoteric system available to the Renaissance Magi that was operated via a 3/7/12 model. I am referring here to the 3/7/12 system of modal music, which the Renaissance magi took great interest in for healing purposes.  To be brief, the “three” (as in Mother Letters) are the three genera of the Greek musical Modes, the chromatic, the enharmonic, and the diatonic. The “seven” is the seven notes that make up any scale, octave to octave. The twelve is the number of intervals of division available within the octave, from which a scale is selected. Twelve is the number of mathematical zones or slices into which the octave is divided, seven of which will be picked to make up the notes in the scale. So twelve represents the number of mathematical decisions that have to be made to define an octave, any octave, out of the infinite glissando of rising and falling notes available in nature.[7]

This 3/7/12 idea turns out to be common between the Hebrew, the Greek, and the Hindu canons of music.[8] The model of tonal correspondences I borrowed to correlate the Ophanic letters with musical tones originated from Alan Bennett (1872-1923). Initiated in 1894, Alan Bennett was a member of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn and also a friend, mentor and associate of Aleister Crowley. Robert Wang (creator of the Golden Dawn Tarot Deck and the Jungian Tarot Deck), one-time secretary to Israel Regardie, said he’d gleaned the information himself from one of Bennett’s notebooks.[9]

Music is vibrational physics sensed through the ear/brain combination and has existed in written form as far back as ancient Sumeria. The old frequency for middle C seems to have been about 256 hertz, a doubling of 128, which is 64 doubled, which is 32 and so on. Physics describes “Harmonics” as proportional frequencies at inversely proportional amplitudes. If we play an “A” (440hz), harmonically we will not only hear the 440hz tone, but also an overtone of 880hz at half the volume (first harmonic), a 1320hz tone at a third the volume (second harmonic), a 1760hz tone at a quarter of the volume (third harmonic), etc., until the frequencies get too high or the volume gets too low to be detected by the ear. The musical scale is a natural consequence of pure mathematics and nature. It was not invented, but discovered–one good reason why music can be regarded as the true universal language and why it is appropriate to our discussion here.

All objects have a frequency or set of frequencies with which they naturally resonate. When an object is forced into resonance, whether struck, plucked, strummed or otherwise disturbed, it vibrates at one of its natural frequencies in such a manner that a standing wave is formed within the object. The standing wave pattern represents the harmonic frequencies established within that object.  Everything to know about a quantum system can be discovered through the calculation and analysis of its wave function.  The model of Quantum mechanics is merely another way of to describe the harmonic structure of space. What if each Ophanic letter can be associated with one or more standing waves?


Standing Waves form Platonic Solids

The students of Buckminster Fuller (b. 1895 – d. 1983) and his protegè Dr. Hans Jenny (b. 1904 – d. 1972) dipped a spherical balloon in dye and pulsed it with pure sine wave sound frequencies. As a result, a small number of evenly-distanced nodes connected by thin lines formed across the surface of the sphere. In 3D, these standing waves produced structures corresponding to the platonic solids. A tetrahedron is formed from four evenly spaced nodes. Six evenly spaced nodes form an octahedron while eight evenly spaced nodes form a cube. Twelve evenly spaced nodes form the icosahedron and twenty evenly spaced nodes form the dodecahedron.

This experiment confirmed that within the atom (the basic building block of matter) the platonic solids are formed in a vacuum by electromagnetic waves. Dr. Jenny’s work marked the beginning of the new science of modal phenomena or “Cymatics,” the study of visible sound and the patterns made by certain sound frequencies as they vibrate from the surface of a plate, diaphragm, or membrane. People interested in viewing the original results of this seminal study are encouraged to read Jenny’s 1967 ground-breaking book, CYMATICS, A Study of Wave Phenomena.[10]

Light is a wave form, a frequency which operates in the same spectrum as sound, but only at a much higher vibrational rate. The DNA of all living things emits photons (Refer to the entire Section 3 of this book). All living plants and animals possess a faint bio-luminescent glow in the small and compartmentalized spectrum of visible light from infrared to ultraviolet. Scientists, such as Mitsuo Hiramatsu of the Central Research Laboratory at Hamamatsu Photonics in Japan, theorize the light “is a kind of chemiluminescence,” a luminescence based on chemical reactions, such as that which make fireflies glow.[11]

In 1988, Dr. David Deamer collaborated on a project to measure the vibrational frequencies of the four DNA base molecules to translate them into sound. Deciphering DNA frequencies into sound led to unusual insights into the harmonic fabric of DNA. In her abstract, “The Infrared Frequencies of DNA Bases as Science and Art,” Susan Alexjander wrote:

The questions of ‘translating’ light into sound is more a philosophical one. Sound sped up can of course never be light, since the former depends upon molecules to push around while the second derives from electromagnetic radiation. One could argue that what is important here is not so much the medium but the ratios involved; the relationships between frequencies. The ears can detect about 10 octaves of sound, while the eyes can only perceive a little over one octave of light, or color. An octave in light is the same ratio as an octave in sound… 2:1. A perfect fifth, or a relationship of 3:2 is the same proportion in light as sound (and can be continued into the world of geometry, architecture, movements of the planets and so forth; anywhere there is a periodic or regular vibration). By discovering patterns of ratios in light, we are simply translating into a sound medium to “hear” what information they might contain and how they relate to each other. It could also be argued that both light and sound refer back to a common archetype which, as yet, is unknown to us, not unlike cousins who relate back to a common relative.

Again, four base molecules were measured: adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine. Each base molecule after being subjected to light yielded about 15 or 18 frequencies; 60 in all.[12]

We will return later to the subject of how the Ophanic letters may relate to the above-mentioned sixty sound frequencies detectable within our DNA.

Dimensional Doorways

Thus far, we’ve examined Ophanic against the classic geometric canons and considered the meaning behind their arrangement on a 3 x 7 grid which pointed to a possible relationship with musical scales and octaves.  We have assigned tonal equivalents to the letters giving us such interesting concepts as wave-length, vibration, frequency and harmonics to mull over.  We’ve discovered that the standing waves produced by sound will create the platonic solids and noted the possibilities of translating light-emitting DNA into sound.  Let’s now revisit the Ophanic letters and regard them abstractly–as 3-D objects moving freely in space.

One of the primary features of the Ophanic letterforms is the relationship between the thick and the thin strokes. What is the reason for the thick strokes? The thick/thin ratio could suggest a spatial relationship. If the thick strokes are closest to the viewer, would the thin strokes indicate the parts of a letter that are being stretched the furthest through out space?

My favorite explanation is that the Ophanic letters are merely shadows of different flows of energy. The existence of the 16×16 grid (refer to Section 6: The Complete Ophanic Handbook) with its four different symmetry sets, or vantages of the 8×8 grid suggests that each letter’s proper spatial orientation is a key factor.

ophan19Let us begin with the simplest letter: “T.”  In 2-D, the letter is a three-sided shape containing only three points. Essentially, it’s a triangle. The 3-D representation of a triangle is a tetrahedron, but if the surface of the solid is curved, a cone is produced. The cone has a flat round base and its sharp, pointy end is called the vertex or apex. Mathematical equations defining conic structures usually imply the existence of the cone’s reflection through the apex: the double cone. The double cone is familiar to us because it is usually the model that illustrates Einstein’s concept of Space-time.  When considering the letter T in 3-D as a conic shape, its Space-time association may end up being an integral aspect of the letter’s dynamic function.

John Dee himself was very familiar with three-dimensional conic structures and referred to them in his treatise, Monas Hieroglyphica written 12 years before he encountered the Ophanic beings. In their discussion of Dee’s Theorem VI in a 2007 article published in The Journal of the Western Mystery Tradition, Burns and Moore elucidate Dee’s mastery of geometry as applied to letterforms:

Dee invites us to visualize the cross in terms of conic sections. First Dee asks us to picture a diagonal passing through a rectilinear cross; basically, a third line running through the point where these two intersect. His references to “V” and light also suggest the shape of a cone, if one imagines this in three dimensions. Then he tells us five (V) is a circular number, alluding to the circle as one of the four conic sections. If one makes the diagonal an axis for two cones sharing the same vertex, or point, and let that point be the intersection of the lines of the cross, we now have two cones and a plane. The plane can intersect the cones in one of seven ways, and makes one of seven figures: a circle, an ellipse, a parabola, a hyperbola, a point, a line, or a cross:

If the plane is running through the vertex, as Dee describes, then we can have only a point, line, or cross.[13]

Wouldn’t it be second-nature for Dee to apply these higher 3-D geometries to the form and structure of the letter shapes presented to him by the angels?


ophan21So far, the study of this angelic alphabet has always been from a limited human-centric point of view. Instead, let’s choose to take the long view and see things from the much broader angelic perspective. If we suspend disbelief and become open to the thought that Ophanic is honestly an angelic language, we quickly move out of our depth and comfort zone. It’s useless to debate whether or not Ophanic is “natural” (it is not) and just asking this question completely misses the point.

Could there be such a thing as a powerful, non-physical, symbolic logos existing simultaneously in all dimensions of time and space? Simply acknowledging the very existence of a vibratory language stretches the definition, as well as the possibilities and ultimate purpose of a sacred language.

What a daunting task it would be for an angelic being to translate 4-D information into a 2-D alphabet simple enough to be understood by human beings existing within the dense gravity-well of physical reality. Ophanic is so unique, it’s in a category by itself and therefore must be examined using criteria beyond 2-D that opens up some fascinating areas of study.

Along with visualizing Ophanic letters as 3-D shapes, what if we broaden our point of view to include movement? Adding the energy of rotation to a cone will produce a form that spins, like a tornado. The T shape, for example, can be perceived as a shadow of one spinning 3-D funnel shape. The letter O is composed of two non-touching spinning vortices. If all the letters are actually dynamically moving forms whirling in space, the only thing we would be able to perceive in 2-D would be their cast shadows. These shapes would change if the shadows of the whirling forms were viewed from different angles. Their specific orientation in space (or position on paper in 2-D) seem to be an important factor.

The reason to introduce the science of how energy flows in an article about letters is because the Ophanic alphabet is an integral part of the geometrical structure that creates a bridge between the “zones” or dimensions. We at least owe it to ourselves to investigate this aspect. The shape of energy is the only thing that could pass through the gap between the physical and non-physical. Waves and frequency also play their part. When examining the letter shapes, it would be well to keep in mind the dynamics of energy’s movement.

ophan22A “spiral” and a “helix” are often confused but represent different objects. A spiral defines a flat, planar curve that emanates from a central fixed point, its curve progressively getting farther away as it revolves around the point, like the grooves on a record disc. Conversely, a helix is a three-dimensional coil that runs along the surface of a cylinder, like the threads on a pipe or a telephone cord.  A cross between a spiral and a helix is known as a “Conic Helix.” An example of a conic helix is the tapered spring used in remote controls to hold and make contact with batteries. In nature, the tendrils emerging from the vines of grapes or squash define this shape.  A conic helix also happens to be the shape that best describes how energy spins in a vortex.

ophan23Using the model of a spinning tornado as guide, the general movement of the energy swirls upward towards the wide part of the funnel. Some of the letters seem to possess multiple-vortices, something not unknown to tornados. There are multi-vortex tornadoes that contain two or more small, intense sub-vortices circulating around the center of a larger tornado complex. There are also satellite tornados, weaker tornados that form very near a large, strong tornado but are contained within the same meso-cyclone. Although satellite tornados appear to “orbit” the larger tornado (creating the appearance of one, large multi-vortex tornado), they actually have a distinct funnel, much smaller than the main funnel.[14] The energetic properties of a vortex are phenomenal. As can be seen in the illustration at left, a toroidal shape is created by the way the energy of a vortex moves. It seems as if the Torus is our best 3-D model to understand the primal structure of the universe.

A Torus is a flexible doughnut-shaped vortex of energy that is constantly turning itself inside out. Just like a rotating smoke ring, the Torus is a self-organizing and self-sustaining sphere of energy constantly spinning out from its center.  The illustration at the top of the next page shows that a 3-D oscillating vortex ring creates standing waves.


ophan25Likewise, the energy movement of subatomic particles—such as the illustration of an electromagnetic model (above right) of the electron—can also be described as toroidal. These tiny toroidal loops of energy continually unfold outward from their centers and then fold back inward in rapid succession. Although the energy waves of subatomic particles appear to be traveling along a linear path, they are actually concentric waves of larger loops of energy.  The electromagnetic model of the electron (above) shows only a portion of its electric and magnetic lines of force but still indicates the energetics of even the smallest of particles are basically toroidal.

The letter that most resembles a Torus Vortex would be the symmetrical letter H (H). However, the essential structure of the 3-D letter would be revealed only when sliced in half with its bottom partially cored. The letter’s energetics are definitely centrally focused.

As mentioned earlier, one of the most distinctive features of the Ophanic alphabet is its thick, bugle-shaped serifs.  Without exception, each letter begins and ends thickly.  Thinking in terms of sound, perhaps the fat terminals indicate the some of the different tonal qualities already mentioned.  From this point onward, the serifs are referred to as energy portals, or flows. The following study reduces the Ophanic letters into conical projections. The differences between the letters reflect the many ways different cones connect and interact with each other.

The flow mechanics of the Ophanic alphabet involve Helixes, Conic Helixes, and Toroidal Vortices. For the sake of simplicity, each cone’s flow properties are basically described as flowing in one direction, like water spiraling through a pipe. However, it must be understood that the complete energetics are as complex as our model of a spinning tornado. For instance, when tilted properly, the simplest form would represent the probable energetics of the Ophanic letter form T.

Single Vortex curves are secondary strokes which start from a single point somewhere within the main stroke.  Vortex Pairs are essentially two cones connected by the main stem.  There are several types: pairs which connect gently through a curve, pairs connecting through a straight path and pairs that connect at right angles. The inference is that the energy flow (and resulting sound?) would differ depending upon the letter’s specific structural properties, such as shape and angle. There are also letters containing Conic Helixes that pierce and interpenetrate the main channel, changing the flow properties and, most likely, the tonal qualities.

ophanic letter components

Ophanic letter components

Ophanic letter components

The Wonder and Triumph of “One and Threefold”

Were it not for one important consideration, skeptics might have been tempted to dismiss this entire line of inquiry.  But the truth—the undeniable proof of its correctness—can be observed in Raphael’s triumphant words given in Latin after dividing the letters into three groupings of seven.  Let us recall what Dee recorded:

Then he lay down before it: and there cam two lines and parted the 21 letters into 3 partes, eche being of 7. He sayd, Numerus o perfectissimus, Unus et Trinus. Gloria tibi, Amen.

The translated Latin reads: “The number, O most perfect, One and Threefold. Glory be to you.[15] In the diagram below, notice that within the first column corresponding to the first line, there are three letters containing five cones, one letter containing four cones and three letters containing 2 cones, totaling seven. . The second and third lines likewise contain the one and three pattern, thus providing us with the following: line one, 3 – 1 – 3; line two, 1 – 3 – 3; and line three, 3 – 3 – 1.  Because the pattern could just as easily have involved 2s, 4s or 5s, I contend this “one and threefold” pattern referred to above is Raphael’s way to indicate we are on the right track.


If this is the case, it would only follow that sixty, being the total number of flows, would also be significant. And so it is.  Let’s recall another earlier discussion in which “sixty” was found to be the number of frequencies that happen to be detectable within our DNA.

By comparing all 60 pitches, we can find all of the precise ratios found in the first 16 harmonics of the overtone series: octaves, P5th, P4ths, Major and minor thirds, Major and minor 2nds and 7ths; even a ‘flat’ seventh. According to Susan Alexjander: “Mathematically, the odds of this happening at random are almost non-existent.”[16] This information is made more phenomenal in consideration of discoveries directly connecting the substance of DNA with the syntax of language.

Language Reflects the Syntax of DNA

In their ground-breaking book, “Vernetzte Intelligenz,” two German scientists cite the work of the Russian biophysicist and molecular biologist Pjotr Garjajev and his colleagues who explored the vibrational behavior of DNA by modulating certain frequency patterns (sound) onto a laser-like ray and discovered it influenced DNA frequency and thus the genetic information itself. Their conclusion: “Living chromosomes function just like a holographic computer using endogenous DNA laser radiation.”  The authors, Fosar and Bludorf, go on to say that according to their findings:

…our DNA is not only responsible for the construction of our body but also serves as data storage and communication. The Russian linguists found that the genetic code -especially in the apparent “useless” 90%- follows the same rules as all our human languages.

To this end they compared the rules of syntax (the way in which words are put together to form phrases and sentences), semantics (the study of meaning in language forms) and the basic rules of grammar.  They found that the alkalines of our DNA follow a regular grammar and do have set rules just like our languages. Therefore, human languages did not appear coincidentally but are a reflection of our inherent DNA.[17]

If the proper frequencies of sound are used, the DNA substance (in living tissue, not in vitro) will always react to language-modulated laser rays and even to radio waves. Or one can simply use words and sentences of the human language directly since the basic structure of DNA-alkaline pairs and language is of the same structure and no DNA decoding is necessary. They have effectively proven that it is entirely normal and natural for our DNA to react to language.

No one knows how sound, the raw stuff of creation, impacts our being; our consciousness. Mysteriously, we decode meanings which come to us through sonic carrier waves, perceiving these waves as a full-body experience not only through the ears but directly through the bones, tissue and matter of the body. The body mass feels sound as pressure. We know that the body is constantly piezoelectric, translating pressure into electrical signals, such as the way in which the inner ears send signals to the brain. Sound, therefore, impacts the many realms of the molecular world directly and somehow finds its way to the parts of us that make meanings.[18]

Part Two’s search for meaning led us directly to the understanding that a profound relationship exists between the Ophanic alphabet, the geometry of sound/music, and DNA. When investigating how DNA connects with music, Dr. Larry Dossey claims there is no reason in principle why DNA needs to only be described using the terminology of organic chemistry:

It could be described using many symbols, even musical notes. If we were imaginative enough to think musically as well as alphabetically, this just might permit us to hear the music of the body. This experience could provide us with nobler visions of the body, and might allow us at long last to escape the tyranny of machine thinking.[19]

The Whirling Ones

From the latter half of September until the end of 2009, as a part of my quest to comprehend the fuller implications of the Ophanic letters, I submerged myself wholly into the depths of a prolonged creative expedition. Only a few days into the New Year, I return from the holidays with a more detached perspective.

As more objectivity returns to balance out the subjective parts of my experience, I conclude this article. In Part One, I objectively analyzed the physical characteristics of the alphabet. However, in Part Two, I approached the subject matter differently and am aware of having been guided. How many times did I just “happen” to run across the very threads I needed to arrive at a dynamic glimpse of the truth? Throughout the entire creative process, I received many hints in the form of numbers, signs and symbols. All I needed to do was to remain centered enough to notice and follow the guidance of synchronicity. Because Part Two was written at the same time breakthroughs were taking place, it becomes an accurate record of one artist’s creative process.

After reaching the stage of envisioning the letters as conical projections, I began to recall my collective experience of the Ophanic beings that I shared with a handful of other people on an Arizona mountain in 1996.  Comparing notes afterward, everyone agreed these Higher Dimensional Intelligences appeared as individual whirling tornados descending from the sky on a luminous corridor best described as “Jacob’s ladder.”  Like transparent spinning energy tops covered with thousands of eyes, they spun up and down the brilliance stretching down from the heavens into our circle.  They were not scary, but awesome and beautiful and too numerous to count.

Already being familiar with the “Whirling Ones” made me confident I could recognize their energetic signature on a visceral level if I could but reconnect with them intuitively. This informed my decision to approach the meaning of the Ophanic letters with the sensitivities and sensibilities of an artist. If I was less open in my approach, I may not have covered as much ground. Luckily, the creative process allowed me to skip gently along spiral pathways where my attention would be pulled towards certain key nodes or intersection points. In those places, I would linger long enough to obtain momentary but insightful glimpses of the hidden relationships existing between seemingly unrelated concepts.

It was easy to regard the Ophanic alphabet as 3-D energy shapes in constant spin and flux.  In meditation, I could “see/feel” parts of the letters dynamically moving in and out of physical reality. The energy seemed to emanate from the thinnest parts and disperse towards the thick parts.  With no visible source, I imagined the energy originating and emerging from a different dimension to interpenetrate the fabric of our reality at the thinnest points within the main stem.  Then I began to think in terms of sound. Since the inherent geometry of sound is a vibrational frequency which effects our reality, why couldn’t sound act as a catalyst, a conduit that moves information from one phase into another?

We have already glimpsed how our world, the whole fabric of our reality in this dimension, is created by sound.  The geometry of sound expresses itself through waves of energy.  Energy waves, constant or at least standing in the same place for a little while, builds forms and shapes. Soon I wondered what types of sounds could be produced by each letter. Perhaps the “F” is actually a peculiar type of flute capable of five different tones, the “G” a strange type of clarinet and the “P” a resonant drum. The problem:  I only had the vision but did not know the science.  My solution entailed locating images resembling what I “saw” within my mind’s eye and allowing synchronicity to help me find them.  If this describes lateral thinking, Part Two is ripe with examples.

For the purposes of this article, figuring out all the specifics is not as critical as the general sweep of the information.  Whatever the exact correlations may end up being, it’s initially enough for me to understand that probable relationships exist without having to specifically define them. Intimated are interesting affiliations between such diverse things as: sound and vibration as universal building blocks; bonds between harmonics, sacred geometry and symbols; how our DNA resonates with 60 specific frequencies; spinning toroidal structures casting shadows that form an alphabet symbolic of the way DNA responds to syntax; letter sound combinations that promise to trigger the next stage of evolution locked within the human genome, etc… Sound engineers, musicians or those with discerning ears are invited and encouraged to continue the work that unlocks the door to understanding the correlations between the Ophanic letters and their correspondences with the tonal harmonics of DNA.

In closing, the best way I can describe the whole of my experience over the last three months is as a “spiral journey informed by intuition.”  The intuitive clues I chased moved me quickly across vast distances, progressing me ever closer and inward to experience minute glimpses of the Truth.  As I ponder the beauty of trusting the process, another Truth emerges.

Recognizing the Vital Role of the Ophanic Artist

I suddenly realize just how indispensable “the Artist” archetype actually is to our Ophanic work.  The Artist archetype embodies the passion to express a dimension of life that exists just beyond the five senses. Artists hold within themselves (or have access to) the unknown quotient capable of bridging two or more worlds. Through their artistic endeavors, spiritually attuned artists serve as “Openers of the Way” by supplying the creative spark that crosses the gap from one state of being to another. The role of the artist as a spiritual bridge also explains how and why art can be transcendent.

Artists born with the necessary inner resources to discern subtle energies need to be honored for cultivating their sixth sense.  Within the Ophanic context, painters, poets, and musicians easily portray “The Artist” archetype but this archetype can also extend to physicists, mathematicians, magicians, dowsers, architects, singers, shamans, linguists, dancers—or anyone especially sensitive to stimuli beyond the reach of linear thinking. People who think laterally/spatially are also more likely to possess the “unknown quotient” mentioned above.

How staggering it is to fully grasp the extent of the awesome power locked within each human being. The potential for self-healing as well as planetary healing is phenomenal. But even more phenomenal is that we’ve been given a direct means to communicate on a fractal level with the intelligence of our own DNA. And this is happening at a key moment in time, just as the Earth completes its 26,000 year cycle.

ophan27Judging from many ancient petroglyphs found within every corner of the world, it would seem that from very early on, humans have always held an unique relationship with this higher form of consciousness.

Perhaps this logos is the very one mentioned in the biblical text of John (1:1):

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.Slightly rephrased, we could say:

In the beginning was the Word. And with the Word came sound. And through Sound came form.&rdquo

Or to be more precise:

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with DNA and the Word was DNA.

We have the means to affect our future in a positive way. All we need to do is to understand and communicate with the awesome God fractal contained within each of us.


Journal of the Western Mystery Tradition – No. 18, Vol. 2. Vernal Equinox 2010

(Note: This article is a chapter from the forthcoming The Ophanic Revelation, available in English from Aethyrea Books and Italian from NewLife Ediziona in May.)


Before Tesla Died, He Never Did Release His Theory of Dynamic Gravity

When Tesla was 82, instead of speaking at a dinner party, he issued a written statement:

“I have worked out a dynamic theory of gravity in all details and hope to give this to the world very soon. It explains the causes of this force and the motions of heavenly bodies under its influence so satisfactorily that it will put an end to idle speculations and false conceptions, as that of curved space. According to the relativists, space has a tendency to curvature owing to an inherent property or presence of celestial bodies.

Granting a semblance of reality to this fantastic idea, it is still very self-contradictory. Every action is accompanied by an equivalent reaction and the effects of the latter are directly opposite to those of the former. Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curvature of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies and, producing the opposite effects, straighten out the curves.

Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible -However, even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for them and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion.”

Eric Dollard – Tesla 2.0 – Crash Course in Electrical Engineering

Eric Dollard is a legendary electrical engineer trained by RCA, Bell Labs and the US Navy. He is the only man alive to have successfully replicated Nikola Tesla’s wireless electricity technology and is considered to be the modern living Tesla. Because of his contribution to electrical science and his advancements in a Tesla-Alexanderson type of Advanced Seismic Warning System, the Federal Government’s documents in relation to this project refer to him as Dr. Eric Dollard, which confers to him an honorary PhD. His fans lovingly refer to him as Professor Dollard. The Lone Pine Writings (Part 1) and its content was developed out of the general frustration of the author when trying to teach others about his work in electrical engineering.

Related Article – Read First! Watch 3 hour history lecture.
We Are Not Smart! We Stand on the Shoulders of Giants – The History of Electrical Theory

With the history covered and honorable mentions out of the way, now to tackle some hard theory. EM Basics and introduction to Steinmetz simplified symbolic algebra.


This is one of Eric Dollard’s presentations and demonstrations from way back in the Borderlands days. Eric Dollard authorizes this version of this presentation for unlimited distribution. You can get it in a zip file at Eric’s official homepage – this is relevant to Wireless Giant of the Pacific.



Seismic Warning System Update!:



Jefimenko’s Electrostatic Motors & Heaviside’s Gravitational EM Analogy

From Oleg D. Jefimenko,
Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: A Different
Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields

, 2nd ed., (Electret Scientific, Star City, 2000)

This reproduction of Heaviside’s article is an unedited copy of the original, except that I have converted some formulas and all vector equations appearing in the article to modern mathematical notation.

[Part I, The Electrician, 31, 281-282 (1893)]


Electrostatic Motors

» JEFIMENKO, Oleg : Electrostatic Motors ~ PDF copy of the out-of-print classic. Run motors with atmospheric electricity.

Popular Science  ( April 1971 )

The Amazing Motor That Draws Power from the Air

byC.P. Gilmore & William J. Hawkins

Would you believe an electric motor made almost entirely of plastic? That can run on power transmitted through open air? And sneak free electricity right out of the earth’s electrical field?

At the University of West Virgina we saw a laboratory full of such exotic devices spinning, humming, and buzzing away like a swarm of bees. They are electrostatic motors, run by charges similar to those that make your hair stand on end when you comb it on a cold winter’s day.

Today, we use electromagnetic motors almost exclusively. but electrostatics have a lot of overlooked advantages. They’re far lighter per horsepower than electromagnetics, can run at extremely high speeds, and are incredibly simple and foolproof in construction.

“And, in principle,” maintains Dr Oleg Jefimenko, “they can do anything electromagnetic motors can do, and some things they can do better.”

Jewel-like Plastic Motors.

Jefimenko puts on an impressive demonstration. He showed us motors that run on the voltage developed when you hold them in your hands and scuff across a carpet, and other heavier, more powerful ones that could do real work. Up on the roof of the University’s physics building in a blowing snowstorm, he connected an electrostatic motor to a specially designed earth-field antenna. It twirled merrily from electric power drawn out of thin air.

These remarkable machines are almost unknown today. Yet the world’s electric motor was an electrostatic. It was invented in 1748 by Benjamin Franklin.

Franklin’s motor took advantage of the fact that like charges repel, unlike ones attract. He rigged a wagon-wheel-sized, horizontally mounted device with 30 glass spokes. On the end of each spike was a brass thimble. Two oppositely charged leyden jars — high voltage capacitors — were so placed that the thimbles on the rotating spokes barely missed the knobs on the jars ( see photo ).

As a thimble passed close to a jar, a spark leaped from knob to thimble. That deposited a like charge on the thimble, so they repelled each other. then, as the thimble approached the oppositely charged jar, it was attracted. As it passed this second jar, a spark jumped again, depositing a new charge, and the whole repulsion-attraction cycle began again.

In 1870, the German physicist J.C. Poggendorff built a motor so simple it’s hard to see what makes it work. The entire motor, as pictured here, is a plastic disk ( Poggendorff used glass ) and two electrodes. The electrodes set up what physicists call a corona discharge; their sharp edges ionize air molecules that come in contact with them. These charged particles floating through the air charge the surface of the palstic disk nearby. Then the attraction-repulsion routine that Franklin used takes place.

A few papers on electrostatic  motors have trickled out of the laboratories in recent years. But nobody really showed much interest until Dr Jefimenko came on the scene.

The Russian-born physicist was attending a class at the University of Gottingen one day shortly after World War II when the lecturer, a Prof. R.W. Pohl, displayed two yard-square metal plates mounted on the end of a pole. He stuck the device outside and flipped it 180 degrees. A galvanometer hooked to the plates jumped sharply.

“I could never forget that demonstration,” said Jefimenko. “And I wondered why, if there is electricity in the air, you couldn’t use it light a bulb or something.”

Electricity Everywhere

The earth’s electrical field has been known for centruries. Lightning and St Elmo’s fire are the most dramatic manifestations of atmospheric electricity. But the field doesn’t exist just in the vicinity of these events; it’s everywhere.

The earth is an electrical conductor. So is the ionosphere, the layer of ionized gas about 70 kilometers over our heads. The air between is a rather poor insulator. Some mechanisms not yet explained constantly pumps large quantitites of charged particles into the air. The charged particles cause the electrical field that Jefimenko saw demonstrated. Although it varies widely, strength of the field averages 120 volts per meter.

You can measure this voltage with an earth-field antenna — a wire with a sharp point at the top to start a corona, or with a bit of radioactive materials that ionizes the air in its immediate vicinity. near the earth, voltage is proportional to altitude; on an average day you might measure 1200 volts with a 10-meter antennas.

Over that past few years, aided by graduate-student Henry Fischbach-Nazario, Jefimenko designed advanced corona motors. With David K. Walker, he experimented with electret motors. An electret is an insulator with a permanent electrostatic charge. It produces a permanent electrostatic charge in the surrounding space, just as a magnet produces a permanent magnetic field. And like a magnet, it can be used to build a motor.

Jefimenko chose the electrostatic motor for his project because the earth-field antennas develop extremely high-voltage low-current power — and unlike the electromagnetic motor — that’s exactly what it needs.

The Climactic Experiment

On the night of Sept. 29, 1970, Jefimenko and Walker strolled into an empty parking lot, and hiked a 24-foot pole painted day-glow orange into the sky. On the pole’s end was a bit of radioactive material in a capsule connected to a wire. The experimenters hooked an electret motor to the antenna, and, as Jefimenko describes it, “the energy of the earth’s electrical field was converted into continuous mechanical motion.”

Two months later, they successfully operated operated a corona motor from electricity in the air.

Any Future In It?

Whether the earth’s electrical field will ever be an important source of power is open to question. There are millions — perhaps billions — of kilowatts of electrical energy flowing into the earth constantly. Jefimenko thinks that earth-field antennas could be built to extract viable amounts of it.

But whether or not we tap this energy source, the electrostatic motor could become important on its own.

* In space or aviation, it’s extreme light weight could be crucial. Jefimenko estimates that corona motors could deliver one horsepower for each 3 pounds of weight.

* They’d be valuable in laboratories where even the weakest magnetic field could upset an experiment.

* Suspended on air bearings, they’d make good gyroscopes.

In a particularly spectacular experiment, Jefimenko turned on a Van de Graaff generator — a device that creates a very-high-voltage field. About a yard away he placed a sharp-pointed corona antenna and connected it to an electrostatic motor. The rotor began to spin. The current was flowing from the generator through the air to where it was being picked up by the antenna.

The stunt had a serious purpose: The earth’s field is greatest on mountaintops. Jefimenko would like to set up a large antenna in such a spot, then aim an ultraviolet laser beam at a receiving site miles away at ground level. The laser beam would ionize the air, creating an invisible conductor through apparently empty space.

To be sure, many difficulties exist; and no one knows for sure whether we’ll ever get useful amounts of power out of the air. But with thinking like that, Jefimenko’s a hard man to ignore.

Popular Science ( May 1971 )

Electrostatic Motors You Can Build


C.P. Gilmore & William J. Hawkins

When we crank up the electrostatic motor at the top of this page, people always want to know what makes it run. It is mysterious — there’s nothing but a plastic disk and two strange electrodes. Yet there it is, spinning merrily.

In “The Amazing Motor That Draws Power From the Air”, last month, we told about our visit to the laboratory of Dr Oleg Jefimenko at the University of West Virginia, who has designed and built a variety of these ingenious machines. now, as promised, we bring you details on how you can build your own electrostatic motor from simple materials.

The devices that you see here are corona-discharge motors. The sharp-pointed or knife-edge electrodes create a corona, which ionizes or charges the air particles floating by. These charged particles transfer their charge to the closest part of the plastic rotor and charge it up, just as you can charge your body by walking across a wool rug on a dry winter’s day.

Once a spot on the rotor assumes a charge, it is repelled from the chargin electrode by electrostatic forces, and at the same time is attracted to the other electrode, which has an opposite charge. When the charged section of the rotor reaches the opposite electrode, another corona discharge reverses the polarity and starts the whole thing over again.

The Concept is Simple

And so are the motors. But that doesn’t mean thery’re easy to build. These motors run on millionths of a watt; they’ve got no power to waste turning stiff bearings or slightly misaligned rotors. So they must be built with watch-making precision.

They’re made of acrylic sheet, rod, and tube stock — Plexiglas and Lucite are two of the better-known brands. Acrylic cuts and works beautifully. Cut edges can be sanded so they have a white, frosted appearance that, in contrast with clear surfaces, gives your finished motor a sparkling, jewel-like appearance. If you like clear edges, you can buff them on a wheel and the whole thing becomes transparent.

Drill and tap the acrylic and assemble parts with machine screws. This allows for fine adjustment and alignment. Later, you can make the whole thing permanent by putting a little solvent along the joints. The solvent flows into the joint and fuses it permanently.

Details of framework, support and so on aren’t important; change them if you like. but work with care if you want to avoid headaches. The Poggendorff motor looked simple; we slapped it together in a couple of hours, hooked up the power source — and nothing happened. We gave it a few helpful spins by hand, but it wouldn’t keep running.

The cure took about 3 hours. First, we noticed that the outer edge of the disk wobbled from side to side about 1/16 of an inch as the wheel revolved. So the rotor-electrode distance was constantly changing. There was a little play in the 1/4″ hole we had drilled for the electrodes — so they weren’t lined up absolutely square with the disk. Then we noticed that the disk always stopped with one side down. The imbalance was only a fraction of an ounce — but it was too much.

We drilled out the old hub and cemented in a new one — this time, carefully. We lined up the electrodes — precisely. Then, once more spinning the disk by hand, we added bit of masking tape until it was perfectly balanced. We connected the power — and slowly… slowly… the disk began to turn. After about a minute, we clocked some turns with a watch and found it was spinning at 200 rpm. A moment later, we lost count. It was a great feeling.

Where Tolerances Are Brutal

We had even more trouble with the octagonal-window machine. When it wouldn’t run and we turned the shaft by hand, we could feel the rotor dragging. We took it apart, felt all the surfaces on the rotor and the framework’s insides and found a few bits of hardened cement, which we removed. We filed down all edges on the rotor adn the windows to make sure there were no beads or chips dragging.

The rotor and corner separators are made from the same sheet of 1/2″ plastic, so rotor clearance is achieved by putting shims at the corners to hold the side plates slightly more than 1/2″ apart. With the 1/16″ shims we were using, we could see that the sides were slightly misaligned so the shaft was not being held at a true 90 degrees. We drilled slightly oversized holes in the corners of one side piece and carefully adjusted until the rotor was turning true in the slot. To give the motor more torque, we put a bead of cement along the outer edge of each aluminum-foil electrode to stop corona leakage. The motor ran.

Take A Giant Step

Once you’ve built these machines, why not design your own? Start with the Jefimenko 1/10 hp model (pictured) as a challenge. Then plan one from scratch. You can power your motors with a laboratory high-voltage supply, a Van de Graff generator, or a Wimhurst machine or any other high-voltage source. We’ve been running ours on the home-built Wimhurst machine shown in the photos. (If you don’t want to build one, Wimhurst machiens are available from scientific supply houses such as Edmund Scientific ).

The discharge globes are traditional for high-voltage machines. They aren’t necessary, but they give a quick check on machine operation and a satifying arc when you move them within 1/2″ of each other. Incidentally, that funny smell is ozone. But its concentration is too low to be harmful. The generator is safe, too. You can hold both electrodes in your hands and all you’ll feel is a tingle. This particular generator, we estimate, puts out about 30,000 volts.

To make wiring simple, we used standard connectors on the Wimhurst collectors, and meter leads with regular banana plugs and alligator clips to hook up the motors.

Last month, we mentioned seeing Dr Jefimenko run his electrostatic motors on electricity tapped from the earth’s field. We haven’t had a chance to try this yet with ours, but it should work. If you want to try, you’ll need a needle-pointed piece of music wire a few inches long to start a corona, plus several hundred feet of fine copper wire.

Connect the pointed wire to the fine conductor, get the sharp point up into the air at least 200-300 feet with a kite or balloon, and hook the wire to one side of the motor. Hook the other side of the motor to ground. The earth field antenna should at times be able to develop up to 20,000 volts from the earth’s electrical field. If nothing happens, check your equipment, or try another day. The field changes constantly.

Oleg D. Jefimenko

(October 14, 1922, Kharkiv, Ukraine – May 14, 2009, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA) – physicist and Professor Emeritus at West Virginia University.


Jefimenko received his B.A. at Lewis and Clark College (1952). He received his M. A. at the University of Oregon (1954). He received his Ph.D. at the University of Oregon (1956). Jefimenko has worked for the development of the theory of electromagnetic retardation and relativity. In 1956, he was awarded the Sigma Xi Prize. In 1971 and 1973, he won awards in the AAPT Apparatus Competition. Jefimenko has constructed and operated electrostatic generators run by atmospheric electricity.

Jefimenko has worked on the generalization of Newton’s gravitational theory to time-dependent systems. In his opinion, there is no objective reason for abandoning Newton’s force-field gravitational theory (in favor of a metric gravitational theory). He is actively trying to develop and expand Newton’s theory, making it compatible with the principle of causality and making it applicable to time-dependent gravitational interactions.

Jefimenko’s expansion, or generalization, is based on the existence of the second gravitational force field, the “cogravitational, or Heaviside’s, field”. This is might also be called a gravimagnetic field. It represents a physical approach profoundly different from the time-space geometry approach of the Einstein general theory of relativity. Oliver Heaviside first predicted this field in the article “A Gravitational and Electromagnetic Analogy” (1893).

Selected publications


* “Electrostatic motors; their history, types, and principles of operation”. Star City [W. Va.], Electret Scientific Co. [1973]. LCCN 73180890
* “Electromagnetic Retardation and Theory of Relativity: New Chapters in the Classical Theory of Fields”, 2nd ed., Electret Scientific, Star City, 2004.
* “Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation: A Different Approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields”, 2nd ed., Electret Scientific, Star City, 2000.
* “Electricity and Magnetism: An Introduction to the Theory of Electric and Magnetic Fields”, 2nd ed., Electret Scientific, Star City, 1989.
* “Scientific Graphics with Lotus 1-2-3: Curve Plotting, 3D Graphics, and Pictorial Compositions”. Electret Scientific, Star City, 1987.

Book chapters

* “What is the Physical Nature of Electric and Magnetic Forces?” in Has the Last Word Been Said on Classical Electrodynamics? — New Horizons, A. E. Chubykalo, Ed., (Rinton Press, Paramus, 2004 ).
* “Does special relativity prohibit superluminal velocities?” in Instantaneous Action at a Distance in Modern Physics: “Pro” and “Contra”, A. E. Chubykalo, Ed., (Nova Science, New York, 1999).


* “A neglected topic in relativistic electrodynamics: transformation of electromagnetic integrals”., 2005.
* “Presenting electromagnetic theory in accordance with the principle of causality”, Eur. J. Phys. 25 287-296, 2004. doi:10.1088/0143-0807/25/2/015
* “Causality, the Coulomb field, and Newton’s law of gravitation” (Comment), American Journal of Physics, Volume 70, Issue 9, p. 964, September 2002.
* “The Trouton-Noble paradox,” J. Phys. A. 32, 3755–3762, 1999.
* “On Maxwell’s displacement current,” Eur. J. Phys. 19, 469-470, 1998.
* “Correct use of Lorentz-Einstein transformation equations for electromagnetic fields”, European Journal of Physics 18, 444-447, 1997.
* “Retardation and relativity: Derivation of Lorentz-Einstein transformations from retarded integrals for electric and magnetic fields”, American Journal of Physics 63 (3), 267-72.
* “Retardation and relativity: The ease of a moving line charge”, American Journal of Physics, 63 (5), 454-9.
* “Direct calculation of the electric and magnetic fields of an electric point charge movingwith constant velocity,” Am.J.Phys. 62, 79-84, 1994.
* “Solutions of Maxwell’s equations for electric and magnetic fields in arbitrary media,” Am. J. Phys. 60, 899-902 1992.
* “Electrets,” (with D. K. Walker) Phys. Teach. 18, 651-659, 1980.
* “How can An Electroscope be Charged This Way?”, TPT 56, 1979.
* “Water Stream ‘Loop-the-Loop'”, AJP 42, 103-105, 1974.
* “Franklin electric motor,” Am. J. Phys. 39, 1139-1141, 1971.
* “Operation of electric motors from atmospheric electric field,” Am. J. Phys. 39, 776-779, 1971.
* “Demonstration of the electric fields of current-carrying conductors,” Am. J. Phys. 30, 19-21, 1962.
* “Effect of the earth’s magnetic field on the motion of an artificial satellite,” Am. J. Phys. 27, 344-348, 1959.

Encyclopedia Article

* “‘Maxwell’s Equations'”, Macmillan Encyclopedia of Physics, Macmillan, New York, 1996.

The next energy breakthrough is Dr. Oleg Jefimenko’s electrostatic motors. Discovered by Ben Franklin in the 18th century, electrostatic motors are an all-American invention. They are based on the physics of the fair-weather atmosphere that has an abundance of positive electric charges up to an altitude of 20 km. However, the greatest concentration is near the ground and diminishes with altitude rapidly. Dr. Jefimenko discovered that when sharp-pointed antennas are designed for a sufficient length to obtain at least 6000 volts of threshold energy, the fair-weather current density available is about a picoampere per square meter. Such antennas produce about a microampere of current. However, small radioactive source antennas may be used instead that have no threshold voltage and therefore no height requirements. Similar to a nuclear battery design of Dr. Brown, these antennas have larger current potentials depending upon the radioactive source used (alpha or beta source) and ionize the air in the vicinity of the antenna. Electrostatic motors are lighter than electromagnetic motors for the same output power since the motor occupies the entire volume. For example, it is expected that a motor one meter on a side will provide a power of one megawatt and weigh 500 kg or less. Electrostatic motors also require very little metal in their construction and can use mostly plastic for example. They can also operate from a variety of sources and range of voltages. As Dr. Jefimenko points out, “It is clear that electrostatic motor research still constitutes an essentially unexplored area of physics and engineering, and that electrostatic motor research must be considered a potentially highly rewarding area among the many energy-related research endeavors.”[5] The atmospheric potential of the planet is not less than 200,000 megawatts. He has succeeded in constructing demonstration motors that run continuously off atmospheric electricity. Jefimenko’s largest output motor was an electret design that had a 0.1 Hp rating.[6] Certainly the potential for improvement and power upgrade exists with this free energy machine.

Book Report

So I go out on my step and what to my wondering eyes doth appear but the box from containing the Jefimenko books that Bill Miller shamed me into finally buying. So I take a quick look inside and decide to give an initial report here. (Too much vector math in there for a thorough review.)

These books have some amazing advanced thinking in the understanding of Maxwell and EM. One first thought is the consideration of causality. This is typically totally ignored in the EM community. Evidence of that is the fact that EM waves are widely held to be propagated by the E field creating the H field and the H field creating the E field as it goes along. Too bad it’s just not true! Jefimenko points out that causality demands that that an event must be PRECEDED by it’s cause! Simultaneous events CANNOT be “causal” of each other. Hence E and H fields of waves are created by the WAVE SOURCE not each other! Same things goes for the E field created by Faraday induction. It simply cannot be “caused” by the time-varying Magnetic Field. “Magnetic induction” is therefore a misnomer. Such induction is caused by the source CURRENT and NOT the magnetic field!

This leads Jefimenko on to note that contrary to the “one E field” theory that has been believed for so many years, the inductive E field is clearly NOT the same field as an electrostatic E field. Jefimenko terms this inductive E field the “Electrokinetic Field” to show that it is a different field from the electrostatic E field. Very good. However, old habits die hard and even Jefimenko persists in writing an expression for a “total E field” following Maxwell as consisting of a sum of the electrostatic and electrokinetic parts as if they were both the “same” kind of E field.

Jefimenko then proceeds to illustrate the electrokinetic fields with a series of calculations and examples using his formulas as an approach. He presents it as basically a “new” way of doing this and in one sense it is compared to the commonly used and non-causal bogus “flux linkage” methods. However, he fails to note that the causal Neumann formula is in essence identical to his formulation and has been a standard formulation for years for the calculation of the “electrokinetic field” or what is usually termed “mutual induction”. Nevertheless his example calculations are important basic references to the topic of Faraday induction. And the consideration of causality clearly shows that the Neumann approach has the edge over the “flux linkage” ideas with at times fail to give correct results.

But the subject doesn’t end with induction, he pulls gravity into the mix. Of particular interest is that he shows that once you introduce causality into Newton’s theory of gravitation, interesting things start to happen! Relativity suddenly begins to show up and even more interesting “action-reaction” is soon discovered to actually be a law that does NOT hold in all cases! The electromagnetic nature of gravity quickly becomes strongly hinted at and without action-reaction laws, those dreamed of devices such as anti-gravity ships and the “force-glove” that you wear to push over a building become theoretical possibilities! These are truly books full of thought-provoking new ways of looking at tired old physics!

I’m not going to be going through the large quantity of field theory math in these books in a hurry, but that’s OK because clearly taking the time to go through in detail WILL be worth the effort! What can I say? Listen to Bill Miller and get that order off to now. At roughly $25 each these two books are a huge bargain to the usual EM text books costing hundreds of dollars and then being full of bogus ideas and misunderstandings of the established theories. Just do it! I did and I’m not sorry I did!


The Bizarre and Intriguing Story of Oleg Jefimenko and the Solutions to Maxwell’s Equations

I recently heard the story of Oleg Jefimenko during a lecture on Electrodynamics, specifically the general solution to Maxwell’s Equations.

Jefimenko’s tiny bit of fame comes from Jefimenko’s Equations, which are the general solution to Maxwell’s equations expressed solely in terms of sources, that is charge and current distributions. The equations are messy and difficult to work with, and aren’t used much in practice. But they do reveal certain bits of physics (such as the applicability of the quasistatic approximation (the link goes to a thermodynamics page, but the idea is the same) and that fields must be created by sources), and it’s always nice to have the general solution to a problem available.

These equations weren’t written down until 1966, about a century after Maxwell’s Equations were known. Some people will claim (as the Wikipedia article cited does) that Jefimenko’s Equations were written down earlier, but those earlier versions are always slightly different and not quite complete. What’s really funny is that Jefimenko wrote them down in an attempt to formulate an alternative to Maxwell’s equations.

When my current Professor, David Griffiths, was in the process of writing a paper on the subject, he independently derived Jefimenko’s equations, and tried to figure out if anyone had done it before. Other than some slightly tricky and annoying math, they’re not hard to derive, so someone must have done it. He found that Jefimenko had written them in a book that was published by a company that had only published one other work, also by Jefimenko (apparently regular publishers wouldn’t take his books, so he went to a prestige press). He contacted Jefimenko, and Jefimenko didn’t believe that he had solved Maxwell’s equations, but that he had created an electromagnetic theory separate from (and doubtless better than) Maxwell’s. Of course he had done no such thing, his formulation is exactly equivalent to Maxwell’s, but he wasn’t buying it.

According to Griffiths, Jefimenko currently submits one or two papers a week to American journals, gets denied, then publishes them in Europe (where review is apparently not as stringent). I don’t know what they’re about, the Wikipedia article says he focuses on overthrowing Einstein’s General Relativity and Maxwell.

I found this story behind some esoteric equations to be pretty amusing, and thought others might agree. I hope you’ve enjoyed the convoluted and intriguing story behind Jefimenko’s equations.

[Most of my information comes from a lecture with Griffiths, and as such could not be found online. Anything that is available online has been referenced.]

Electret Scientific Co
P.O. Box 4132
Star City,   WV   26504 USA

Books by Professor Oleg Jefimenko

(also available from

Gravitation and Cogravitation — Developing Newton’s Theory of Gravitation to its Physical and Mathematical Conclusion,
Paperback – List Price US$ 22.00
Hardback – List Price US$ 32.00

Electrostatic Experiments — An Encyclopedia of Early Electrostatic Experiments,   Demonstrations,   Devices,   and Apparatus,
by G.W. Francis (author), Oleg Jefimenko (editor)
Paperback – List Price US$ 24.00
Hardback – List Price US$ 48.00

Electromagnetic Retardation and Theory of Relativity — New Chapters in the Classical Theory of Fields, 2nd edition,
Paperback – List Price US$ 24.00
Hardback – List Price US$ 44.00

Causality, Electromagnetic Induction, and Gravitation — A Different approach to the Theory of Electromagnetic and Gravitational Fields,   2nd edition,
Paperback – List Price US$ 22.75
Hardback – List Price US$ 32.50

An Introduction to the Theory of Electric and Magnetic Fields,   2nd edition,
Hardback – List Price US$ 72.00

Electrostatic Motors — Their History, Types, and Principles of Operation,

Out of Print — free e-book download available soon

Electrostatic Experiments: An Encyclopedia of Early Electrostatic Experiments, Demonstrations, Devices, and Apparatus (Paperback)

Electrostatic Motors (Paperback)
by Oleg D. Jefimenko

Scientific American ( October, 1974 )

Electrostatic Motors Are Powered by Electric Field of the Earth


C. L. Stong

Although no one can make a perpetual motion machine, anyone can tap the earth’s electric field to run a homemade motor perpetually. The field exists in the atmosphere between the earth’s surface and the ionosphere as an electric potential of about 360,000 volts. Estimates of the stored energy range from a million kilowatts to a billion kilowatts.

Energy in this form cannot be drawn on directly for driving ordinary electric motors. Such motors develop mechanical force through the interaction of magnetic fields that are generated with high electric current at low voltage, as Michael Faraday demonstrated in 1821. The earth’s field provides relatively low direct current at high voltage, which is ideal for operating electrostatic motors similar in principle to the machine invented by Benjamin Franklin in 1748.

Motors of this type are based on the force of mutual attraction between unlike electric charges and the mutual repulsion of like charges. The energy of the field can be tapped with a simple antenna in the form of a vertical wire that carries one sharp point or more at its upper end. During fair weather the antenna will pick up potential at the rate of about 100 volts for each meter of height between the points and the earth’s surface up to a few hundred feet. At higher altitudes the rate decreases. During local thunderstorms the pickup can amount to thousands of volts per foot. A meteorological hypothesis is that the field is maintained largely by thunderstorms, which pump electrons out of the air and inject them into the earth through bolts of lightning that continuously strike the surface at an average rate of 200 strokes per second.

Why not tap the field to supplement conventional energy resources? Several limitations must first be overcome. For example, a single sharp point can draw electric current from the surrounding air at a rate of only about a millionth of an ampere. An antenna consisting of a single point at the top of a 60-foot wire could be expected to deliver about a microampere at 2,000 volts; the rate is equivalent to .002 watt. A point-studded balloon tethered by a wire at an altitude of 75 meters might be expected to deliver .075 watt. A serious limitation appears as the altitude of the antenna exceeds about 200 meters. The correspondingly higher voltages become difficult to confine.

At an altitude of 200 meters the antenna should pick up some 20,000 volts. Air conducts reasonably well at that potential. Although nature provides effective magnetic materials in substances such as iron, nickel and cobalt, which explains why the electric-power industry developed around Faraday’s magnetic dynamo, no comparably effective insulating substances exist for isolating the high voltages that would be required for electrostatic machines of comparable power. Even so, electrostatic motors, which are far simpler to build than electromagnetic ones, may find applications in special environments such as those from which magnetism must be excluded or in providing low power to apparatus at remote, unmanned stations by tapping the earth’s field.

Apart from possible applications electrostatic motors make fascinating playthings. They have been studied extensively in recent years by Oleg D. Jefimenko and his graduate students at West Virginia University. The group has reconstructed models of Franklin’s motors and developed advanced electrostatic machines of other types.

Although Franklin left no drawing of his motor, his description of it in a letter to Peter Collinson, a Fellow of the Royal Society, enabled Jefimenko to reconstruct a working model [see illustration at right]. Essentially the machine consists of a rimless wheel that turns in the horizontal plane on low-friction bearings. Each spoke of the “electric wheel,” as Franklin called the machine, consists of a glass rod with a brass thimble at its tip. An electrostatic charge for driving the motor was stored in Leyden jars. A Leyden jar is a primitive form of the modern high-voltage capacitor. Franklin charged his jars with an electrostatic generator.

The high-voltage terminals of two or more Leyden jars that carried charges of opposite polarity were positioned to graze the thimbles on opposite sides of the rotating wheel. The motor was started by hand. Thereafter a spark would jump from the high-voltage terminal to each passing thimble and impart to it a charge of the same polarity as that of the terminal. The force of repulsion between the like charges imparted momentum to the wheel.

Conversely, the thimbles were attracted by the oppositely charged electrode of the Leyden jar Franklin placed on the opposite side of the wheel. As the thimbles grazed that jar, a spark would again transfer charge, which was of opposite polarity. Thus the thimbles were simultaneously pushed and pulled by the high-voltage terminals exactly as was needed to accelerate the wheel.

Franklin was not altogether happy with his motor. The reason was that running it required, in his words, “a foreign force, to wit, that of the bottles.” He made a second version of the machine without Leyden jars.

In this design the rotor consisted principally of a 17-inch disk of glass mounted to rotate in the horizontal plane on low-friction bearings. Both surfaces of the disk were coated with a film of gold, except for a boundary around the edge. The rotor was thus constructed much like a modern flat-plate capacitor.

Twelve evenly spaced metal spheres, cemented to the edge of the disk, were connected alternately to the top and bottom gold films. Twelve stationary thimbles supported by insulating columns were spaced around the disk to graze the rotating metal spheres. When Franklin placed opposite charges on the top and bottom films and gave the rotor a push, the machine ran just as well as his first design, and for the same reason. According to Franklin, this machine would make up to 50 turns a minute and would run for 30 minutes on a single charge.

Jefimenko gives both motors an initial charge from a 20,000-volt generator. They consume current at the rate of about a millionth of an ampere when they are running at full speed. The rate is equivalent to .02 watt, which is the power required to lift a 20-gram weight 10 centimeters (or an ounce 2.9 inches) in one second.

Jefimenko wondered if Franklin’s motor could be made more powerful. As Jefimenko explains, the force can be increased by adding both moving and fixed electrodes. This stratagem is limited by the available space. If the electrodes are spaced too close, sparks tend to jump from electrode to electrode around the rotor, thereby in effect short-circuiting the machine. Alternatively the rotor could be made cylindrical to carry electrodes in the form of long strips or plates. This scheme could perhaps increase the output power by a factor of 1,000. 

Reviewing the history of electrostatic machines, Jefimenko came across a paper published in 1870 by Johann Christoff Poggendorff, a German physicist. It described an electrostatic motor fitted with a rotor that carried no electrodes. The machine consisted of an uncoated disk of glass that rotated in the vertical plane on low-friction bearings between opposing crosses of ebonite. Each insulating arm of the crosses supported a comblike row of sharp needle points that grazed the glass.

When opposing combs on opposite sides of the glass were charged in opposite polarity to potentials in excess of 2,000 volts, air in the vicinity of the points on both sides of the glass was ionized. A bluish glow surrounded the points, which emitted a faint hissing sound. The effect, which is variously known as St. Elmo’s fire and corona discharge, deposited static charges on both sides of the rotor.

Almost the entire surface of the glass acquired a coating of either positive or negative fixed charges, depending on the polarity of the combs. The forces of repulsion and attraction between glass so charged and the combs were substantially larger than they were in Franklin’s charged thimbles. The forces were also steadier, because in effect the distances between the combs and the charged areas remained constant. It should be noted that adjacent combs on the same side of the glass carried charges of opposite polarity, so that the resulting forces of attraction and repulsion acted in unison to impart momentum to the disk, as they did in Franklin’s motor.

By continued experimentation Poggendorff learned that he should slant the teeth of the combs to spray charge on the glass at an angle. The resulting asymmetrical force made the motor self-starting and unidirectional. When the teeth were perpendicular to the glass surface, the forces were symmetrical, as they were in Franklin’s motor. When the machine was started by hand, it ran equally well in either direction.

Poggendorff was immensely pleased by the rate at which his machine converted charge into mechanical motion. He concluded his paper with a faintly odious reference to Franklin’s device. “That such a quantity of electricity must produce a far greater force than that in the [Franklin] electric roasting spit,” he wrote, “is perfectly obvious and nowadays would not be denied by Franklin himself. With one grain of gunpowder one cannot achieve so much as with one hundred pounds.”

Electrostatic motors are now classified in general by the method by which charge is either stored in the machine or transferred to the rotor. Poggendorff’s machine belongs to the corona type, which has attracted the most attention in recent years. Although its measured efficiency is better than 50 percent, Poggendorff regarded it merely as an apparatus for investigating electrical phenomena. He wrote that “it would be a sanguine hope if one wanted to believe that any useful mechanical effect could be achieved with it.”

Poggendorff’s negative attitude toward the usefulness of his design may well have retarded its subsequent development. A modern version of the machine constructed in Jefimenko’s laboratory has an output of approximately .1 horsepower. It operates at speeds of up to 12,000 revolutions per minute at an efficiency of substantially more than 50 percent. In one form the modern corona motor consists of a plastic cylinder that turns on an axial shaft inside a concentric set of knife-edge electrodes that spray charge on the surface of the cylinder [see illustration at left]. Forces that act between the sprayed charges and the knife-edge electrodes impart momentum to the cylinder.

Machines of this kind can be made of almost any inexpensive dielectric materials, including plastics, wood and even cardboard. The only essential metal parts are the electrodes and their interconnecting leads. Even they can be contrived of metallic foil backed by any stiff dielectric. The shaft can be made of plastic that turns in air bearings. By resorting to such stratagems experimenters can devise motors that are extremely light in proportion to their power output. Corona motors require no brushes or commutators. A potential of at least 2,000 volts, however, is essential for initiating corona discharge at the knife-edges.

A smaller and simpler version of the machine was demonstrated in 1961 by J. D. N. Van Wyck and G. J. Kühn in South Africa. This motor consisted of a plastic disk about three millimeters thick and 40 millimeters in diameter supported in the horizontal plane by a slender shaft that turned in jeweled bearings. Six radially directed needle points grazed the rim of the disk at equal intervals. When the machine operated from a source of from 8,000 to 13,000 volts, rotational speeds of up to 12,000 revolutions per minute were measured.

I made a corona motor with Plexiglas tubing two inches in diameter and one and a half inches long. It employed stiffbacked single-edge razor blades as electrodes. The bore of the tube was lined with a strip of aluminum foil, a stratagem devised in Jefimenko’s laboratory to increase the voltage gradient in the vicinity of the electrodes and thus to increase the amount of charge that can be deposited on the surface of the cylinder. I coated all surfaces of the razor blades except the cutting edges and all interconnecting wiring with “anticorona dope,” a cementlike liquid that dries to form a dielectric substance that reduces the loss of energy through corona discharges in nonproductive portions of the circuit.

The axial shaft that supports the cylinder on pivot bearings was cut out of a steel knitting needle. The ends of the shaft were ground and polished to 30degree points. To form the points I chucked the shaft in an electric hand drill, ground the metal against an oilstone and polished the resulting pivots against a wood lap coated with tripoli.

The bearings that supported the pivots were salvaged from the escapement mechanism of a discarded alarm clock. A pair of indented setscrews could be substituted for the clock bearings. The supporting frame was made of quarter-inch Lucite. The motor can be made self-starting and unidirectional by slanting the knife-edges. Those who build the machine may discover, as I did, that the most difficult part of the project, balancing the rotor, is encountered after assembly. The rotor must be balanced both statically and dynamically.

Static balance was achieved by experimentally adding small bits of adhesive tape to the inner surface of the aluminum foil that lines the cylinder until the rotor remained stationary at all positions to which it was set by hand. When the rotor was balanced and power was applied, the motor immediately came up to speed, but it shook violently. I had corrected the imbalance caused by a lump of cement at one end of the rotor by adding a counterweight on the opposite side at the opposite end of the cylinder. Centrifugal forces at the ends were 180 degrees out of phase, thus constituting a couple.

The dynamic balancing, which is achieved largely by cut-and-try methods, took about as much time as the remainder of the construction. To check for dynamic balance suspend the motor freely with a string, run it at low speed and judge by the wiggle where a counterweight must be added. Adhesive tape makes a convenient counterweight material because it can be both applied and shifted easily.

I made the motor as light and frictionless as possible with the objective of operating it with energy from the earth’s field. The field was tapped with an antenna consisting of 300 feet of No. 28 gauge stranded wire insulated with plastic. It is the kind of wire normally employed for interconnecting electronic components and is available from dealers in radio supplies.

The upper end of the wire was connected to a 20-foot length of metallic tinsel of the kind that serves for decorating a Christmas tree. The tinsel functioned as multiple needle points. Strips cut from window screening would doubtless work equally well.

The upper end of the tinsel was hoisted aloft by a cluster of three weather balloons. Such balloons, each three feet in diameter, and the helium to inflate them are available from the Edmund Scientific Co. (300 Edscorp Building, Barrington, N.J. 08007). The weight in pounds that a helium-filled balloon of spherical shape can lift is roughly equal to a quarter of the cube of its radius in feet. To my delight the motor began to run slowly when the tinsel reached an altitude of about 100 feet. At 300 feet the rotor made between 500 and 700 revolutions per minute.

A note of warning is appropriate at this point. Although a 300-foot vertical antenna can be handled safely in fair weather, it can pick up a lethal charge during thunderstorms. Franklin was incredibly lucky to have survived his celebrated kite experiment. A European investigator who tried to duplicate Franklin’s observations was killed by a bolt of lightning. The 300-foot antenna wire can hold enough charge to give a substantial jolt, even during fair weather. Always ground the lower end of the wire when it is not supplying a load, such as the motor.

To run the motor connect the antenna to one set of electrodes and ground the other set. Do not connect the antenna to an insulated object of substantial size, such as an automobile. A hazardous charge can accumulate. Never fly the balloon in a city or in any other location where the antenna can drift into contact with a high-voltage power line. Never fly it below clouds or leave it aloft unattended.

A variety of corona motors have been constructed in Jefimenko’s laboratory. He has learned that their performance can be vastly improved by properly shaping the corona-producing electrodes [see illustration at right]. The working surface of the rotors should be made of a fairly thin plastic, such as Plexiglas or Mylar. Moreover, as I have mentioned, the inner surface of the cylinder should be backed by conducting foil to enhance the corona. Effective cylinders can be formed inexpensively out of plastic sewer pipe. Corona rotors can of course also be made in the form of disks.

One model consists of a series of disks mounted on a common shaft. Double-edged electrodes placed radially between adjacent disks function much like Poggendorff’s combs. This design needs no foil lining or backing because a potential gradient exists between electrodes on opposite sides of the disks. It is even possible to build a linear corona motor, a design that serves to achieve translational motion. A strip of plastic is placed between sets of knife-edge electrodes slanted to initiate motion in the desired direction.

Notwithstanding the problem of handling potentials on the order of a million volts without effective insulation materials, Jefimenko foresees the possibility of at least limited application of corona power machines. In The Physics Teacher (March, 1971) he and David K. Walker wrote: “These motors could be very useful for direct operation from high-voltage d.c. transmission lines as, for example, the 800 kV Pacific Northwest-Southwest Intertie, which is now being constructed between the Columbia River basin and California. It is conceivable that such motors could replace the complex installations now needed for converting the high-voltage d.c. to low-voltage a.c. All that would be required if corona motors were used for this purpose would be to operate local low-voltage a.c. generators from corona motors powered directly from the high-voltage d.c. line.”

As Jefimenko points out, a limiting factor of the corona motor is its required minimum potential of 2,000 volts. This limitation is circumvented by a novel electrostatic motor invented in 1961 by a Russian physicist, A. N. Gubkin. The motor is based on an electret made in 1922 by Mototaro Eguchi, professor of physics at the Higher Naval College in Tokyo.

An electret is a sheet or slab of waxy dielectric material that supports an electric field, much as a permanent magnet carries a magnetic field. Strongly charged carnauba-wax electrets are available commercially, along with other electrostatic devices, from the Electret Scientific Company (P.O. Box4132, Star City, W.Va. 26505). A recipe for an effective electret material is 45 percent carnauba wax, 45 percent water-white rosin and 10 percent white beeswax. Some experimenters substitute Halowax for the rosin.

The ingredients are melted and left to cool to the solid phase in a direct-current electric field of several thousand volts. The wax continues to support the field even though the external source of potential is turned off [see “The Amateur Scientist, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, November, 1960, and July, 1968]. The electret reacts to neighboring charges exactly as though it were a charged electrode, that is, it is physically attracted or repelled depending on the polarity of the neighboring electrode.

Gubkin harnessed this effect to make a motor. The rotor consisted of a pair of electrets in the shape of sectors supported at opposite ends of a shaft. The center of the shaft was supported transversely by an axle. When the rotor turned, the electrets were swept between adjacent pairs of charged metallic plates, which were also in the form of sectors.

The plates were electrified by an external source of power through the polarity-reversing switch known as a commutator. The commutator applied to the electrodes a charge of polarity opposite to the charge of the attracted electret. As the electret moved between the attracting plates, however, the commutator switched the plates to matching polarity. The alternate push and pull imparted momentum to the rotor in exact analogy to Franklin’s motor.

Gubkin’s motor was deficient in two major respects. The distances between the electrodes and the electrets were needlessly large, so that the forces of attraction and repulsion were needlessly weak. Moreover, during the electret’s transit between electrodes its surfaces were unshielded. Unshielded electrets attract neutralizing ions from the air and lose their charge within hours or days.

Both inherent deficiencies of Gubkin’s motor have been corrected in Jefimenko’s laboratory by taking advantage of what is termed the slot effect. Instead of sandwiching the electret alternately between pairs of metal plates, Jefimenko employs opposing pairs of adjacent plates [see illustration at rightt]. The adjacent plates are separated by a narrow slot. When adjacent plates carry charges of opposite polarity, the electret experiences a force at right angles to the slot and in the plane of the electret. The strength of the force is at a maximum because the electret is close to the electrodes. Simultaneously the electrodes function as shields to prevent the neutralization of the electret by free ions.

Motors based on the slot effect can be designed in a number of forms. One design consists of an electret in the shape of a wafer-thin sheet of Mylar supported by a flat disk of balsa wood 100 millimeters in diameter and three millimeters thick. (A long-lasting charge is imparted to the Mylar by immersing it in a field of a few thousand volts from an electrostatic generator after the motor is assembled.) This rotor is sandwiched between four semicircular sectors that are cross-connected [ see illustration ].

The electret is mounted on a four-millimeter shaft of plastic that turns in jeweled bearings. The conducting surfaces of the commutator consist of dried India ink. The brushes are one-millimeter strips of kitchen aluminum foil. The motor operates on a few microwatts of power.

Jefimenko has demonstrated a similar motor that was designed to turn at a rate of about 60 revolutions per minute and develop a millionth of a horsepower on a 24-foot antenna having a small polonium probe at its upper end. (By emitting positive charges probes of this type tap the earth’s field somewhat more efficiently than needle points do.) The performance of the motor easily met the design specifications. The charm of these motors lies in the fact that, although they do not accomplish very much, they can run forever.


ATMOSPHERIC ELECTRICITY. J. Alan Chalmers. Pergamon Press, 1968.


ELECTROSTATICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS. Edited by A. D. Moore. John Wiley & Sons, 1973.

Annales de la Fondation Louie de Broglie 32 (1 ) : 117 ( 2007 )

We Are Not Smart! We Stand on the Shoulders of Giants – The History of Electrical Theory

A rebuttal of the notion that the great electrical engineers of our history and their formulae and experiments are outdated, obsolete or are in any way invalidated by contemporary scientific theories. – A brief exposé of quantum mechanics’ critical errors.


I’ve been accused of being intentionally reductive in my scientific reasoning, with implications this is not a productive pursuit. I prefer the term retroductive myself, theoria apophasis, and find it a near infallible method of logical deduction, personally. I’ve been told i listen to the ‘wrong kinds of scientists’, with implications that people of the past, specifically the great minds of electrical theory and engineering who paved the way for all the technology we have today, somehow have little to no bearing in our modern era, and are overshadowed by these radical new quantum theories of the insane atomistic relativists. Atomism was destroyed by the Greeks thousands of years ago but since then it has reared it’s ugly head again. My intention is to vindicate these men and dispel the illusion that they couldn’t possibly have debunked our modern theories long before they came about.

“Tesla? That was almost 100 years ago, times change. It’s all about Neil Tyson and Richard Feynman now”

Yes times change, but truth is immutable. ‘The caveman’ who discovered fire isn’t an idiot because he is our ancestor when such knowledge will always have practical applications and an observable basis in reality. If anyone is at fault for perpetuating wild, hypothetical, speculative, over-imaginative, logically absurd theoretical conjecture and who fails to deliver empirical evidence of their claims it is The Cult of Quantum. If you think you’re smarter than Tesla show me your tons of patents revolutionizing the world’s electrical grid. No? Didn’t think so.


Moreover, these over popularized fallacies of quantum mechanics repeatedly fail to concede to their scrutiny, despite having been debunked so long ago by these minds the majority consensus has chosen to mostly overlook and dismiss, even given their accomplishments.

Instead, a foolish and malicious agenda in our scientific industry seemingly unfolds as they constantly refuse to admit their mistakes, let alone adequately address the scrutiny that has been gathering dust in the libraries for over a hundred years. The reprecussions are that we ALL lie in their wake on their denial, holding ourselves back from advancements that should have already been achieved. And, who’s to say they haven’t been and we just haven’t been told, but i digress.

It is unfortunate for us that corporate greed and self interest impeded those who were ahead of their time, suppressed and resisted them, but sooner or later society always catches up. One major point i want to put forth is that these people are STILL ahead of their time, but in our current arrogance we have not the vision or humility to see or accept it. If not for the pioneers outlined in this article, you wouldn’t even be reading it right now.

Eric Dollard. The only man known to be able to accurately reproduce many of Tesla’s experiments with Radiant Energy and wireless transmission of power. This is because he understands that conventional electrical theory only includes half of the story.

Watch this video below, and maybe you will learn something!

James Clerk Maxwell. Gave us the rudiments, field equations over time variables. His work is taken grossly out of context by modern quantum.
Michael Faraday. Gave us the principles underlying electromagnetic induction, diamagnetism and electrolysis. Also helped coined the term ‘dielectric’.
Oliver Heaviside. Gave us the coaxial cable, and the TRUE understanding of light.
Charles Proteus Steinmetz. The smartest genius you never heard about.
Nikola Tesla. The smartest genius you have heard about.
Oleg Jefimenko. Numerous PHDs, master of electromagnetic theorem.

Walter Russell. Expanded on and unified much of the works before him.

I suppose i should give an honourable mention to that slimey cretin Edison, as i do believe in giving credit where it is due.

Moving swiftly on, each of these individuals have a piece of a very significant puzzle pivotal to humanity’s advancement in understanding our natural world. Together, i propose actually not far off from The Grand Unified Theory. If this was the case, such a conspiracy to withold this revelation (for whatever reason, perhaps stalled for the ‘right time’) isn’t entirely implausible, and worth some consideration. Assumptions mean nothing. Implications are everything. Truth reveals truth reveal truth, it doesn’t just stop. If it does that is human error alone. Everything connects.

“Too bad, Sir Isaac, they dimmed your renown and turned your great science upside down. Now a long haired crank, Einstein by name, puts on your high teaching all the blame. (he) Says: matter and force are transmutable and wrong the laws you thought immutable. I am much too ignorant, my son, for grasping (crazy) schemes so finely spun.” – N. Tesla (Fragments of Olympian Gossip. by Nikola Tesla regarding Einstein)

Einstein and his ilk reified space as ‘something’ that ‘did things’ and ‘acted upon things’. This is the fallacy of attribute reification, and is a titanic error of thought and theory. Einstein has blamed the flies (forces) on the horse feces (space), completely ignoring the horse (fields) entirely. This brain wasting idiocy can and must come to an end given time and intelligent minds to see clearly. Nobody who has ever lived has seen space ‘do’ anything.

Einstein was once asked what it was like to be the smartest man alive, he replied “I don’t know. You’ll have to ask Nikola Tesla” – Ok, I’ll do that.

“The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane. Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.

The history of science shows that theories are perishable. With every new truth that is revealed we get a better understanding of Nature and our conceptions and views are modified.  There is no conflict between the ideal of religion and the ideal of science, but science is opposed to theological dogmas because science is founded on fact. To me, the universe is simply a great machine which never came into being and never will end. The human being is no exception to the natural order. Man, like the universe, is a machine.

Einstein’s relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king… its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.   The scientific man does not aim at an immediate result. He does not expect that his advanced ideas will be readily taken up. His work is like that of the planter – for the future. His duty is to lay the foundation for those who are to come, and point the way. 

The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence. If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration.” – N. Tesla

You may wish to read that again as for most people it goes in one ear and out the other. This really encapsulates the essence of the motive for this article. I wish to rectify this ludicrous mentality that plagues modern science. Fortunately for me, all the work has already been done, the issue is trying to bring it to light.

“It is a difficult thing to do, to give unlimited energy to limited minds” – N. Tesla

It is time we shatter this farcical paradigm of modern quantum by absorbing only what is useful and rejecting what is useless (the majority, which contradicts current electrical theory). This involves moving The Ego out of the way, we must humble ourselves and admit that we’ve spun a long road for ourselves for a long time which had no relevance to reality whatsoever, and we must not be ashamed to turn back and start again on a sensible route of understanding that actually does have empirical standing and a tangible basis in reality.

“The notion exists that the electro-motive force, E.M.F. in volts, is established by “cutting” lines of magnetic induction via a so called electric conductor. This “cutting” is then said to impel the motions of so-called electrons within the  conducting material. It is however that a perfect conductor cannot “cut” through lines of induction, or flux lines, Phi. Heaviside points out that the perfect conductor is a perfect obstructer and magnetic induction cannot gain entry into the so-called conducting material. So where is the current, how then does an E.M.F. come about? Now enters the complication; it can be inferred that an electrical generator that is wound with a perfect conducting material cannot produce an E.M.F. No lines of  flux can be cut and the Ether gets wound up in a knot. Heaviside remarks that the practitioners of his day “do a good deal of churning up the Ether in their dynamos”. – E. Dollard

You cannot say that stretching a trillion rubber bands nailed to the floor and releasing them or breaking their “force lines” is the “flow of electrons”; discharge is a terminal movement in systems of inductance or dielectric capacitance.

There are no discrete particles in the universe and certainly none that mediate charges, discharges, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation, only fields, all modalities of the Ether. The so-called ‘electrons’ are not particles, not objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle of discharge, and are certainly not charge-carriers, fields are not particles, are not “electrons”, nor assuredly are there energy discharges in the vacuum of space involving ‘electrons’; the ‘electron’ is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even more faulty mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, or an Atomist. Electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization; magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge; dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether give rise to electrification. Phi times Psi gives Q; ‘electrons’ do not mediate these electrical and magnetic forces or their likewise the Ether fields.

There are no electrons, negative charges, special-dimensions, warped space (resoundingly denied by Tesla and others), and no photons; only charge, induction and radiation/discharges and their relational spins, all as mediated through the Ether. Quantum and Relativity is a quack religion of mathematical physics based upon the absurd premise that the universe is a giant sea of interactive massless tiny invisible beads and that space itself, nothing, mediates interactions and can be genuinely ‘warped’. Such conceptual Atomistic reifications as amplified by GR (Relativity) cannot be enjoined, and the only genuine warping occurring is not out in the cosmos of space, but in the empty spaces between the ears of those who reify such absurdities; warped minds rationally would invent warped space; its purely logical in its insanity that the former produce the later. One must move away from the (rehashed) atomistic fallacies of the cult of quantum that propose the universe is a big bag of particles bumping into each other. Mother Nature is not a cross-eyed crack whore with a calculator processing some mathematically ineffable chaos. On the contrary, nature is simple and works of simplex pressure gradient meditations. Everything in the universe is fields fundamentally and fields are nor particles, they can not be quantified because they are incommensurable. This is why modern science has never defined a field. They can’t and won’t.

“JJ Thomson developed the “Ether Atom” ideas of M. Faraday into his “Electronic Corpuscle”, this indivisible unit. One corpuscle terminates on one Faradic tube of force, and this quantifies as one Coulomb. This corpuscle is not and electron, it is a constituent of what today is known incorrectly as an “electron”. (Thomson relates 1000 corpuscles per electron) In this view, that taken by W. Crookes, J.J. Thomson, and N. Tesla, the cathode ray is not electrons, but in actuality corpuscles of the Ether.” – E. Dollard

Space has only one dimension, space, which is a metrical dimension. The use of cubic notation is habit-based, any number of coordinates in any number of geometries can serve to define the boundaries of space. Nature is not governed by the irrational pontifications of GR and QM, rather it is governed by mutually interactive reciprocal conjugates of charges-discharges, centripetalcentrifugal movements, both spatial and counterspatial. Instantaneous action at a distance, and fields are all Ether modality mediations as propagated by counterspace-in-disturbance, the Ether, its pressure gradients and perturbations. No other mediator can be logically hypothesized, much less theorized. The very same Ether of Tesla, Heaviside, C.P. Steinmetz, and even originally from Einstein before logic fled his mind completely, was correct and remains so. Tesla outright denied our current definition of the electron as a ‘discharge particle’.


All electrons are a motional terminus of a quantity of dielectric pressure gradients of force (as reified by the incorrect understanding of the definition of a ‘field’), these pressure gradients, or “lines” are contracting and stretching like rubber bands, giving motion to the terminus ‘electron’. The thermionic ‘electron’ contracts, pulling the ‘electron’, the cathode ray stretching, pulled by the ‘electron’. In the former case the lines of force are dissipated, in the latter case the line of force are projected, in both cases these so called ‘electrons’ assume radial motions, with non participating pressure gradients, or forces filling the ‘voids’, directing the ‘electrons’. Hence, it is the so-called ‘electrons’ (dielectric radial discharges) that travel in straight lines, that is, radially. ‘Electrons’ have nothing to do with the flow of electricity; the so-called ‘electrons’ are the rate at which electricity is destroyed. ‘Electrons’ are in fact the resistance. From extensive experimental work into atomic electrical science by J. J. Thompson, and Nikola Tesla, it is established that the so-called electron is only a shadow; its apparent-only physical mass is merely an electrical momentum (ejected by the dielectric inertia in disturbance). There is no rest mass to an electron nor could there be logically, a rest-electron ‘bead’; such notions are absurd and evidence proven non-existent. The very premise is logically impossible and contradicts the rational physics of atomic charges and discharges.


The loss of inertia necessitates polarity. The rest point in the center is a result of pressure meditation. It is concentrated there because it is the inverse of space (force and motion) it is counter-space (inertia and acceleration). What we call a magnetic field is a reciprocating precessional hyperboloid resultant of a coherent dielectric object. The loss of inertia is magnetism, from this ‘loss’ of inertia, space is ‘created’, as well as the field (Ether)- in which the three components of the field, are always present. Those three components being, magnetism, electricity, and the dielectric plane.


I digress on the issue of electrons, but it’s just one of many examples that can be used to illustrate my points. I’ll cover this in more detail and satisfy your dependencies on calculations soon, don’t worry about that. I merely paste in some of my notes here intended for a more comprehensive article. For those who have been paying attention however, the tangible experimental observational proofs and the according calculations are published already. These are not my ideas, i only bring them to light again now in this most crucial time in humanity’s quest for understanding and truth. Arrogance is a blindfold, humility is enlightening.

I’ve been told by physicists that they don’t use the term field, it is ‘reudctive’ and would never be used in a scientific debate. Don’t you find that interesting?

I ask them very simply “How does one define a ‘Field’ necessitatively? And by that i mean, can you give me the absolute denotation of the quantification of a field in principle?” – As blunt, precise, and straight-forward as that question is, apparently it’s filled with jargon and makes no sense. So i simplify it down again to the best of my ‘reductive’ capabilities and put forth that I’m merely asking for the scientific definition of a field.

It seemed to me like a significant term to truly comprehend in our modern era on science. They use terms like magnetic field, gravitational field, electromagnetic field, quantum field… all these different types of ‘fields’ and yet asking these highly trained academics what a field actually is in principle is fascinating because you never get a straight answer, because they don’t know. I’m told that i must chose a type of field, and only then can they define what a field is. So for the sake of debate i chose ‘magnetic field’ which is a vague and inaccurate term in and of itself by the very denotation of a field, but for simplicity and communication i have to make these sacrifices.

Here is the definition i was offered: “It’s a region around an object or force when speaking of magnetism also when speaking of electro-magnetism.”

Oh i see, different fields define in different ways apparently. haha, how can you explain something or claim to understand it if you use the term itself to define itself to accommodate merely a description? Talk about a cop-out. If i had said gravitational field what do you think the response would be? Let me hazard a guess; “The region of space surrounding a body in which another body experiences a force of gravitational attraction”

Do you see the issue with this? It’s not just a scientific fallacy but a linguistic one also. Hypothetically if you knew nothing about animals and had never seen one before, and i introduced you to one cat a time, each a different breed, and i called them black cat, white cat, fuzzy cat, tabby cat, ginger cat etc. How long before you ask me what a cat actually is? Would you buy my explanation if i told you the word cat doesn’t mean anything by itself but is only applied when speaking of the attributes of a cat?

What is a ginger cat can be answered by “A cat which has the properties of ginger fur” but a child can tell you that, not only are these kind of definitions vague but they are purely descriptive not explanatory. The are NOT scientific denotations or quantifications. They tell you nothing.

If you do the sensible thing and gather up all these separate definitions you can reduce their understanding of a field to “A region of space” and nothing more. NOTHING could be further from the truth. Describing types of fields and defining them by their own attributes matched against the principle term itself is utter nonsense.

Understanding the truth of how all the technology around you works is to understand the secrets of nature. What’s inconceivable to most people is that our contemporary physicists don’t understand how all these things work. They understand them well enough to replicate a technology, and they seem to be somewhat capable of DESCRIBING what is occurring with that technology, but as far as explaining the fundamentals go, they mostly (the humble ones) admit to being clueless along with the rest of the scientific industry.

Anybody can follow a manual and build an electromagnet and give you a description of all the parts and what they do, but that tells you nothing fundamentally about what is actually occurring. Descriptions are not explanations. The technology of these electrical giants was swindled and consequently their true understanding lost.

uni field modalities final final one 0

What is Gravity? Light? Magnetism? Electricity? Dielectricity? Electromagnetism? What is A FIELD? Fundamentally in principle if you can not denote these things by a scientific explanation you have no right using them at all. They are not arbitrary concepts, and they ARE unified. There is no need for a unified field theory; all fields are already unified. What is not unified is human comprehension of the nature of field modalities in relationship to one another. It’s embarrassing i admit, but the irony softens the blow and it’s time to see reason and stop digging ourselves deeper into a hole of nonsense that bares no relevance to reality.

Modern science is biased by design, there is no incentive for debunking, in fact that would potentially interfere with the funding of your colleagues, let alone open yourself up to ridicule. The scientific industry is controlled just like all other information. The main method which this is accomplished is through the design of the system itself which psychologically and emotionally manipulates the individuals towards biased, un-scientific behavior. Peer reviewed circle jerks for example. I’ll give your paper the stamp of approval if you give one for mine. Nobody in their right mind would attempt to publish a paper discrediting Einstein’s bunk theories of relativity because of the backlash of repercussions and lack of funding you’ll receive for challenging the status quo. What we understand as the true and humble scientific method is NOT being implemented in modern society, get it out of your heads that the industry is receptive to new information and quick to admit their mistakes and invalidate their life’s work based on new evidence. It does not work that way,

QM and GR do not explain fields, they denied Tesla’s understanding of the universe even though the EM greats gave us all our technology, and Einstein gave us none of that. He knew jack about electromagnetism, his role was only to plug in the math to turn their bunk theories with bunk mathematics into bunk theories with accurate mathematics. Let me tell you friends, math is not reality. Not unless it actually has applicability first and foremost. If everything in nature worked in trinities for example, society would herald the mind who first thought up the equation 5 – 9 = -4, but scoff at the mind who said 1+2=3. In this scenario, while both sets of math are correct and work out within their own context, only one can be applied to nature with relevancy, and it would explain everything but be dismissed in it’s simplicity. That is the situation we have in my opinion.

Dark matter for another example, is simply QM’s attribute reification fallacy of inertia, the ether, counter-space. They must turn everything into a ‘particle’ otherwise it will not plug into their paradigms because it can not be quantified. Refer back to Tesla’s point about non-physical phenomena, frequency and vibration. Everything is fields, not particles. They are all one field, in truth. Gravity, dielectricty, magnetism, and electricity, are all simply just different attributes of how the reciprocating torus field moves and works.

Fields are not physical, they can not be ‘quantized’ and you can’t measure them in the way QM wants to understand everything, because not everything is phenomena, and not everything is within ‘space’. – They don’t even really understand space.. thanks to Einstein. Wave-particle duality was a false conclusion that we never let go of. I’ve covered that extensively already. The grand unified theory is simple, you just need to know what a field is, that is what unified all these seemingly separate forces… it’s the same thing. All fields are already unified.

Having said that, now you should be able to completely understand the responses i get from the physicists. They are clueless and battling with their own cognitive dissonance. They deny the intrinsic nature of a field, they deny the existence of the ether, and then propose the grand unified theory is so complex its beyond anyone.

We don’t understand what we ‘see’ because we have no real comprehension of the cosmic metaphysical reality, that compliments our physical ‘space’ we observe. We’re all like fish in an ocean, and sometimes we see bubbles in front us, and we say those bubbles are things, they exist and are physical.. but then sometimes we see them vanish, and we don’t really know why or how that is possible, but we know is has something to do with oxygen. Hmmmmm.

Fatal flaw for the fish, they have NO idea they are in an ocean, their comprehension of space is abstract and undefined. They don’t understand the ‘wholeness’ of the medium they exist within therefore they can never truly explain their observations, only describe them.

That’s modern science in a nutshell, for me anyway. Separating the field modalities and denying the ether is akin to saying steam, ice and water are all different things entirely and then denying the existence of the hydrous oxide molecule. Then they call those people who say “it’s all just water”, crazy loons.

In my next article I’ll focus on debunking the religion that is quantum quackery, specifically wave-particle duality and explaining in greater detail what a field actually is in principle.

Also, refer to: Debunking Relativity


Qi – The Scalar Wave Energy & Galactic Fractal Circuits

Qi – The Scalar Wave Energy & Galactic Fractal Circuits

Posted on 7 August, 2015  in Articles, Internal Arts, Metaphysics, Philosophy

Copied from my other site: [ ]

The Taoist Discovery of Qi – The Scalar Wave Energy of the Galaxy


arch-gfc02The ancient philosophers of China predicted 5,000 years ago the forces of Yin and Yang (Taijitu symbol) which represents the two main forces of nature create a vibratory energy called Qi.  These cosmic forces could have been discovered in 2010 when astronomers found massive gamma-ray clouds that are jetting outward from both ends of the super massive black hole (SMBH) at the center of our galaxy.

Dr. Ettore Caretti heads a team of scientists that have constructed a image based upon satellite data of the Fermi-Bubble of the Milky Way Galaxy that is a million times more powerful that any exploding star and fifty million light years in diameter.

According to the ancients Qi is the underling life force within the phenomenal world. Its makeup is polarized (yin and yang) and design structure is analogous to a electrical circuit where the positive (yang) current flows towards a negative (yin) ground (Heaven/Earth). However, when they are directly connected to each other they will short circuit or cancel each other out. A simple working electrical diagram will add an electrical component which allows these two forces to connect indirectly. For example, when a resistor is added, as seen in the picture below, the flow of electrons can take place.


Matter-Energy forms a similar function of a electronic component as a gateway for Qi to flow through in what I call the Galactic Fractal Circuit (GFC). Qi manifest as the four fundamental forces as a decaying form of the energy of the Tao-Neutrino (see previous blog) which is emitted by SMBH.

Modern science would reject the concept of Qi due to Einstein’s theory of E=MC2 which creates a circular argument between matter and energy. This allows science in not having to defined energy separately. Einstein believed in a static universe which is also supported by the law ofConservation of Energy.

“Energy can be neither created nor destroyed, but can change form, for instance chemical energy can be converted to kinetic energy in the explosion of a stick of dynamite. A consequence of the law of conservation of energy is that a perpetual motion machine of the first kind cannot exist. That is to say, no system without an external energy supply can deliver an unlimited amount of energy to its surroundings.” –

However, one particular field of science that could give us insights into how Qi works within nature is called Condensed Matter physics and particularly those states of matter which are formed through BCS Theory such as, Bose-Einstein Condensates (BEC), superconductivity and superfluidity.

BCS Theory which was given the Nobel Prize in 1972 states,

“An electron moving through a conductor will attract nearby positive charges in the lattice. This deformation of the lattice causes another electron, with opposite spin, to move into the region of higher positive charge density. The two electrons then become correlated. Because there are a lot of such electron pairs in a superconductor, these pairs overlap very strongly and form a highly collective condensate.”


Nature uses this same type of superconducting lattice structure in transferring energy within plants through photosynthesis. In 2007, a paper was published in Nature that described the process of energy transfer within photosynthesis as quantum mechanical. This was a surprise to biologist and physicist due to the scientific view that biological systems contained high levels of entropy (heat) which didn’t allow quantum coherence to occur at long enough times periods to be effective.

(Note: For those who are interested in a more detail view of how photosynthesis incorporates quantum processes, see the video below by one of the leading researchers in the field of theoretical quantum computing, Dr. Seth Lloyd from MIT who gave a lecture on this subject in 2011).

As light is collected by photon receptors of the plant, a photoelectric effect is generated creating excitons.

a exciton is a bound state of an electron and an electron hole which are attracted to each other by the electrostatic Coulomb force. It is an electrically neutral quasiparticle that exists ininsulators, semiconductors and in some liquids. The exciton is regarded as an elementary excitation of condensed matter that can transport energy without transporting net electric charge” –

Physicist determined that quantum coherence occurs as these excitons interact with the crystal lattice structure of the plant as it finds its way to a reaction center where it converted into food. This interactions is due to the kinetic energy vibrating this lattice structure of the plant which is mainly generated through temperature. This quantum process allows the exciton to find the energy ground state of the reaction center of the plant 99% of the time. (see article for explanation – Research paper – Photosynthetic reaction center as a quantum heat engine, PNAS February 19, 2013 vol. 110 no. 8 2746-2751).


The reason that this process is so efficient is that the exciton can quantum tunnel through energy barriers to reach the reaction center without using any extra energy in the process as seen in the picture above.

The relationship between light and decoherence (kinetic energy) is similar to how a Taoist would view the relationship between Heaven (yang) and Earth (yin). In this case, Heaven (the Sun) which represents light (exciton) interacts with the vibrating lattice structure of matter (Earth) which induces a third state called quantum coherence. The ancient understood this polarized quality of the Taijitu as universal, however its oscillating or resonance quality of Qi have been misunderstood in the West.

A demonstration of Qi oscillating quality was recorded by the news reporter Bill Moyer of an famous Qigong master in China. When Mr. Moyer puts his hand over the Qigong practitioner’s hand as he is repelling a student, he is quoted  as saying he felt a “vibration” from the master’s hand. (Note: A good book on this subject is “Tai Chi Classics” written by Waysun Liao who published this in 1990 by Shambhala)

These master used techniques which allows them to manipulate this vibrational quality of Qi within the body and transform this energy into what the Chinese called “Jing”. According to ancient Chinese medicine, Qi is part of a group of energies called the “Three Treasures” which include “Jing” (Essence) and Shen (Spirit). The Chinese developed a system of energy medicine based upon this model such as Acupuncture and Qigong to heal this internal structure of the body when it is in disorder.  This also includes the Chinese martial arts where a technique called “Neidan” appeared which taught a internal Taoist technique to master the Three Treasures, as seen in the videos above.

To demonstrate how Qi energy enters and flows through the body, I will only focus on two pathways: eating foods and through our environment such as, light and kinetic energy (temperature). The first pathway uses our digestive organs which are mainly attached to our gut and the second pathway uses our skin cells which converts photon energy which is analogous to the way plants use photosynthesis.

In the first pathway, food which can be viewed as electrons enters our digestive tract which is a type of vibrating lattice (including its microorganisms – flora). While in the second pathway uses our skin cells as photon receptors collecting energy from the sun by generating Vitamin D which supports our digestion and bone structure. These two energy pathways not only fuels biochemical processes but feed into a main Quantum Electrodynamic (QED) circuit within the body which is connected to our digestive system, bone structure and the brain. (For further details, read the Body Electric by Dr. Robert O Becker).

(Note: For more detail review see Dr. Jack Kruse theory which views every cell in our body as a semiconductor (crystal lattice) at the quantum level!)


The ancient Chinese called this main QED circuit within the human body the “The Self Winding Wheel of the Law” or the “Microcosmic Orbit“. The Microcosmic Orbit uses not only energy from the two pathways but energy can be generated by using Qigong techniques through movement where these electrons gather naturally at the Dantien which the Chinese locate just below our belly button and where nutrients-electrons are absorbed into the body through the lower intestines. This flow of electrons gathers in a circuit that moves from the base of the spine, and eventually ending up at the brain, then returning back down to Dantien. This circuit is similar to photosynthesis where excitons starts at the photon receptor and ends at the reaction center of the plant.

Practitioners learns to drum or vibrate the Dantien through using two techniques based upon condensed breathing and Qigong. After a period of time, if done correctly, the student will begin to feel physical effects such as tinging in the Dantien, hands and feet and other phenomenon which indicate the flow of Jing is increasing its vibration.

Usually the student is taught the physical exercises first, then the internal technique. There are very few books on this subject and teachers which openly talk about the internal method in public are looked down upon by the small community of Qigong masters which teach this technique privately where approaches and philosophy vary. Its true form has been broken into pieces through the ages.

In the West, science started with investigating the physical world and discovered its hidden component later as quantum mechanics. But, how did these Taoist masters discovered the true nature of reality?

The ancient masters could have taken the duality concepts from the I Ching and concluded that the physical body (Yin) must have a Yang counterpart within the body that is hidden. Through there investigations these ancient scientists uncovered part of this mystery was connected to the energy “Jing” which fuels what I call the Human Fractal Circuit (HFC) and later discovered the connection with our holographic body which they called shen or spirit.

The Yin (electrical-matter) and Yang (magnetic-holographic) structure of the galaxy is similar to the design of a electrical  generator where an coil (matter-crystal lattice) moves through a magnetic (holographic) field it generates an electric current through the coil.


Science chooses to view this Tao-Neutrino energy as the uncertainty principle which explains why at the quantum level, position and momentum of a particle can not be measured at the same time. Thus, physicist predicts particles are always in a state of constant quantum fluctuations. This is what the ancients have described as Qi, an vibrational energy. As these particles move through the galactic magnetic field at a very high frequency rate it is creating electromagnetic energy which fuels the strong and weak nuclear forces which hold matter together.

At the quantum level, this magnetic galactic energy field is undetectable but at the level of the solar system it could be possible to measure it at the outer edges. The NASA IBEX satellite has detected such a magnetic field that runs perpendicular to the solar system. (see article).


The ancients used Qigong practices to control the vibrational flow of electrons through the Microcosmic Orbit circuit of the body which in turns interacts with its holographic-magnetic counterpart. This process naturally occurs when we sleep at night, which not only allows our physical bodies to heal itself through regeneration but transfers data-energy from our holographic body to our waking consciousness which appears to us as dreams.

This type of communication is made possible through quantum tunneling where by 3D matter-energy can be converted into 2D holographic information. This process occurs in both directions. The alchemist called this 2D holographic dimension the astral plane.

The ancients also discovered new abilities through these experiences of the astral plane especially insights to what is mind and consciousness. The HoloGrid is not based upon 3D space but an 2D information matrix, thus, the holographic-astral mind only has to think of a place and time and our astral body will appear instantly at this location. The ability to quantum tunnel between these dimensions works in either dimension. Thus, the astral plane but can be activated in 3D reality as well. When we use our holographic mind in 3D reality, the reverse occurs, information can be converted into energy! This is what the ancient discovered and was the bases for the internal technique in Qigong. This was practiced in both sleep and the waking state.

For example, there was a 9th century master called Chen Tuan who lived in the famous Wudang Mountains in China which was the center of Taoist practice. He was known as the “Sleeping Immortal” who was adept in the inner alchemy of sleep (astral) meditation and who at times was known be in this state for weeks at a time.

The ancient masters discovered the alchemy of Qi was to balance the world of Jing – Electrons (matter) with the world of Shen – Astral (Holographic) which is the natural state of our consciousness.




The Diagram of Ultimate Power – Galactic Fractal Circuit


The inner meaning of the Taijitu (the yin and yang symbol) was so elegantly described in the “Tao Te Ching” by the mysterious Lao Tzu who characterized it’s “nameless” essence as the Tao. It’s origins are unknown and mysterious. Even though this image has been associated with ancient China it has also appeared within other cultures such as the Celts and Romans.

Taoist interpret the symbols of Yin and Yang as universal polar opposites which is the driving force of change in the cosmos. While others have reviewed its philosophy as a hidden science described within the pages of the I Ching. (note:  see blog – The Science of Chaos Theory and I Ching).

My first exposure to this possibility was through Dr. Katya Walter’s, book, “The Tao of Chaos” which uncovered a fractal mathematics within the I Ching which was similar to Chaos Theory and the structure of DNA. Years later, I began to study Tesla’s Radiant energy and the electrical theories of Dr. Konstanin Meyl which also coincided with these same concepts.


The Taijitu symbol translates into English as the “Diagram of Ultimate Power” which the ancients described as the supreme principle of energy. Modern science called this energy QED or Quantum Electrodynamics which is the framework of the cosmos.


According to Dr. Konstantin Meyl theories, a possible energy source of which fuels our galaxy are streams of faster light neutrinos being emitted from its Black Hole, however, classical physics would debunk this this theory because neutrinos have little effect upon matter.

Neutrino particles are defined as,

“… an electrically neutral, weakly interacting elementary subatomic particle with half-integer spin. The neutrino (meaning “small neutral one” in Italian) is denoted by the Greek letter ν (nu). All evidence suggests that neutrinos have mass but that their mass is tiny even by the standards of subatomic particles. Their mass has never been measured accurately.   …. in the late 1960s, several experiments found that the number of electron neutrinos arriving from the Sun was between one third and one half the number predicted by the Standard Solar Model. This discrepancy, which became known as the solar neutrino problem, remained unresolved for some thirty years. It was resolved by discovery of neutrino oscillation and mass. (The Standard Model of particle physics had assumed that neutrinos are massless and cannot change flavor). However, if neutrinos had mass, they could change flavor, or oscillate between flavors).

While science has agreed that high energy cosmic rays do enter our solar system as gamma rays come from large energy events such as supernovas while Dr. Meyl cosmic rays are predicted to emanate from the super massive black hole (SMBH) at the center of our galaxy. The ability of these faster than light electromagnetic waves is explained by Dr. Meyl is due to quantum tunneling effect.

“Quantum tunnelling refers to the quantum mechanical phenomenon where a particle tunnels through a barrier that it classically could not surmount. This plays an essential role in several physical phenomena, such as the nuclear fusion that occurs in main sequence stars like the sun. It has important applications to modern devices such as the tunnel diode and the scanning tunneling microscope. The effect was predicted in the early 20th century and its acceptance, as a general physical phenomenon, came mid-century.”

“….It is possible for spin zero particles to travel faster than the speed of light when tunnelling. This apparently violates the principle of causality, since there will be a frame of reference in which it arrives before it has left. However, careful analysis of the transmission of the wave packet shows that there is actually no violation of relativity theory. In 1998, Francis E. Low reviewed briefly the phenomenon of zero time tunneling. More recently experimental tunneling time data of phonons, photons, and electrons are published by Günter Nimtz.” –

Dr. Meyl predicts that these electromagnetic waves which I call Tao-Neutrinos decay as they quantum tunnel and change into other particles. A way for these particles to disburse into the other particles could be explained by the Neutrino Oscillation theory. This ability of the neutrino to change into other subatomic particles was,

“… predicted by Bruno Pontecorvo whereby a neutrino created with a specific lepton flavor (electron, muon or tau) can later be measured to have a different flavor. The probability of measuring a particular flavor for a neutrino varies periodically as it propagates. Neutrino oscillation is of theoretical and experimental interest since observation of the phenomenon implies that the neutrino has a non-zero mass, which is not part of the original Standard Model of particle physics. –

The video below explains an experiment designed to observe this effect.

This ability of the neutrino to change its particle type through oscillation is crucial in Dr. Meyl theoretical model because at each stage of the GFC these neutrinos are recreating themselves into lower frequency scalar waves which have only been detected as neutrinos whose source is emanating from our sun within the last fifty years.Before we can review the details of how the GFC works there are two general concepts we need to review; resonance and quantum oscillation. The ability of these particles to access energy from it previous state is made possible by resonance. At the quantum level the Tao-Neutrino is creating a resonance that is using quantum tunneling to fuel all matter in the universe. Each particle is vibrating at a harmonic of this cosmic resonance.

In the case of our sun, these particles are re-emitted as neutrinos which is interacting with h20 (water), the core of our planet and at the quantum level creating a resonance that is fueling the subatomic particles within matter in our solar system.



This process of resonance is simply a small periodic force which enhances a oscillation over time, for example, when a parent pushes a child on a swing, he/she waits until the child reaches its backward apex and adds a little push which increases the child’s forward momentum. Over time this repetitive small force can greatly increase the frequency of the previous oscillations.


From a electrical engineering perspective, the diagram above is a classic electronic resonance schematic which is called a LC circuit; L = Inductor (Coil), C = Capacitor, i = direction of current)

“Resonance of a circuit involving capacitors and inductors occurs because the collapsing magnetic field of the inductor generates an electric current in its windings that charges the capacitor, and then the discharging capacitor provides an electric current that builds the magnetic field in the inductor. This process is repeated continually. An analogy is a mechanical pendulum.” –

This is what is happening at the major junctions within the GFC. Within our solar system, the Sun is acting as a capacitor which is coverting a scalar field of charged particles from the SMBH. Capacitors such as the Sun are being charged and discharged which accessing the the scalar electromagnetic energy field that surrounds the galaxy.

(Note: in the video above, it first discusses the magnetic field shift of the sun will occur between August and December 2013. Including how the sun generates a field of charged particles within the solar system).

Physicist view the resonance principle as a periodic waveform which is similar to the concept of an Quantum Harmonic Oscillator. An example of this would be an mechanical pendulum where an equilibrium point is reached creating equal amounts of force in the opposite directions. For example, in the picture below a ball is connected to a spring which can be used to illustrate many types of wave forms.



These classic quantum oscillations were eventually converted into Freyman diagrams at the quantum level using mathematical models such as the Schrodinger equation which allowed physicists to predict the probability of how electromagnetic wave forms such as the path of an electron would interact within matter (QED – Quantum Electrodynamics) which is used in the science of electrical engineering.

The wavelength and the frequency (oscillations) of electromagnetic energy are divided into the following categories,


Since we don’t have semiconductors with clock speeds running close to speed of light or even at petahertz which is a million times faster than the highest cpu chip we are currently available on the market today. Thus, creating a solid state circuit to generate neutrino energy directly is out of the question, according to Dr. Meyl.

Thus, Dr. Meyl has built a small scale demonstration model using analog technology of this GFC circuit that uses harmonics frequencies such as “short waves” (3 mhz – 30 mhz) and combines solid state components to mimic a design taken from Tesla experiments to show how these concept is possible.

The experimental kit uses coils at resonance frequencies in the range of 4.5 – 7 mhz which transferred between 2 – 4 watts of power without wires between the transmitter and the receiver circuit.


The basic schematic of the transmitter board as seen in the above picture contains a large coil and two LED lights that are wired with different polarity on each broad. Meaning, when the coil on the transmitting board reaches resonance and the Tesla Waves are emitted, the LED lights will turn off and the receiving board will shows the red LED turns on without no external power connected  to it except the grounding wire. This experiment shows that Tesla’s waves transfer energy wirelessly.

The explanation that this energy moves faster than the light is observed by reviewing the effects of two resonating frequencies of the coils which are around 7 and  4.7 mhz.  The second resonance frequency turns the red light on the receiving board around half lit which Dr. Meyl determined the receiving coil was only collecting half of the electrical wave of the transmitting coil was in resonance at 4.7 mhz.

“The self-resonance of the Tesla coils, according to the frequency counter, lies at 7 MHz. Now the frequency is ran down and see there, at approx. 4.7 MHz the receiver again glows, but less bright, easily shieldable and without discernible effect back on the transmitter. Now we unambiguously are dealing with the transmission of the Hertzian part and that goes with the speed of light. Since the wavelength was not changed, does the proportion of the frequencies determine the proportion of the velocities of propagation. The scalar wave according to that goes with (7/4.7=) 1.5 times the speed of light!” – Dr. Meyl  – Scalar Waves – Advance Concepts for Wireless Energy Transfer – 2001

Another approach to understanding the effect of these Tesla waves moving through matter is to examine the phenomenon when larger objects such as a jet fighter moves faster than the speed of sound.


When an object passes through the air it creates a series of pressure waves in front of it and behind it, similar to the bow and stern waves created by a boat. These waves travel at the speed of sound, and as the speed of the object increases, the waves are forced together, or compressed, because they cannot get out of the way of each other. Eventually they merge together into a single shock wave, which travels at the speed of sound, a critical speed known as Mach 1, and is approximately 1,225 km/h (761 mph) at sea level and 20 °C (68 °F).

In smooth flight, the shock wave starts at the nose of the aircraft and ends at the tail. Because the different radial directions around the aircraft’s direction of travel are equivalent (given the “smooth flight” condition), the shock wave forms a Mach cone, similar to a vapor cone, with the aircraft at its tip.” –


This same principle could be applied to neutrino particles (Tesla waves) as they move through a medium such as air or water traveling faster than the speed of light which could be affecting the electrons within the water to emit a bluish photon in the near field. This resonance effect is similar to how “Cherenkov Light” is formed,

“… is produced when a charged particle moves faster than the speed of light in that medium (although of course slower than the speed of light in a vacuum). This creates shock waves of light that emanate out in a cone shape, similar to how an object traveling faster than the speed of sound can produce a sonic boom.” Duke University Website

The video below gives you more a visual explanation,

The electromagnetic radiation the researchers are measuring could actually be decaying Tesla waves in the near field of the reactor. The standard model would disagree with this explanation because science believes neutrinos rarely interact with matter. (note: This is based upon research which uses heavy water in building neutrino detectors in deep caverns below the surface of the earth).

Tesla also observed this same bluish light when Edison was building DC (direct current) transmission lines. Just as the generators were turned on, strange bluish light were observed emanating from the transmission lines. When, direct current flowed through these lines the effect disappeared. This was a clue to Tesla that this wasn’t due to electricity.


(Note: The ancient could have discovered that when Tesla waves travel within matter such as air and rock they create shock waves which follow this pyramid pattern. This is why they built this structure in a pyramid shape to maximize it’s ability to act like a capacitor) where a neutrino source of energy was used to power the pyramid.

phanotron tube

Other researchers such as Royal Rife developed another way of producing Tesla waves by using a plasma device.

“…is one of the four fundamental states of matter (the others being solid, liquid, and gas). Heating a gas may ionize its molecules or atoms (reducing or increasing the number of electrons in them), thus turning it into a plasma, which contains charged particles: positive ions and negative electrons or ions. Ionization can be induced by other means, such as strong electromagnetic field applied with a laser or microwave generator, and is accompanied by the dissociation of molecular bonds, if present.”

Rife used a vacuum tube (phanotron) filled with gas which he ignited into a plasma reaction. By experimenting with this device he discovered he could destroyed microorganism within the body by using modulated electrical radio frequencies through the plasma tube which he exposed to his patients at a close distance. This was more effective than other radiation treatments because it could target specific types of viruses and bacteria while not damaging healthy cells. His plasma device used a specific carrier frequency (3.1 mhz) to power the phanotron tube and then blended additional frequencies to target specific bacteria and viruses within the body (see Anthony Holland work).

Currently, new plasma antenna’s are being developed.

“In an ionized gas plasma antenna, a gas is ionized to create a plasma. Unlike gases, plasmas have very high electrical conductivity so it is possible for radio frequency signals to travel through them so that they act as a driven element (such as a dipole antenna) to radiate radio waves, or to receive them. Alternatively the plasma can be used as a reflector or a lens to guide and focus radio waves from another source.”

What modern science is only discovering now, Rife understood this in the 1930’s. The modulated radio signal created by the Rife device radiates a high frequency RF field which could directly target specific cells as though there cell structure acted as if they were type of inductor or coil.

These early pioneers and the ancients discovered the GFC and its relationship to the sun. Rife understood that a modulated high frequency RF field created specific interference patterns (the hologrid) is the underlining energy structure for all matter in the cosmos.


This is why the ancients described the GFC as “the diagram of ultimate power”. For example, the Greek symbol of the caduceus which came from a older mythology from Egypt uses the analogy of dual snakes to replicate the UFC basic structure of polar induction coils (the snakes wind in opposite directions) which resonate Tesla waves create an electrical vortex field between them which generates all electrical energy. The winged disk configuration on the top represents the sun, which is the source of this neutrino energy. They use this technology for energy, healing and communication where modern science is only beginning to understand.


There has been anecdotal evidence within our ancient past that neutrino energy was generated, understood and used for healing, transportation and communication. Some of these examples however, will be interpreted  within a mixture of current scientific discoveries and what some would call fringe science.


The ancients understood that the Galactic Fractal Circuit (GFC) is constructed from a pair of polarized inductors which they symbolized as snakes(coils) that resonates high frequency Tesla waves through a central magnetic vortex. They discovered the source of this energy was from the sun.

The GFC process was described by the ancients as “a union of opposites” or the joining of the male and female duality.


To convert these heavenly energies of the sun into the material world, the GFC uses basic electronic transformer technology to transfer energy and information.


Transformers use a common iron core between two electrical wire windings which holds the magnetic field that is generated when an electrical current flows through the primary winding on the left side of the transformer, as pictured above. When the magnetic flow moves through the secondary windings it generates an electromagnetic current. Transformers are able to control the output voltage of the secondary part of the circuit by adjusting the number of turns between the primary and secondary windings.

The magnetic core of the transformer could be viewed as the magnetic field generated by the sun which is the solar system’s Hologrid. The primary windings for our local GFC is powered by neutrinos emanating from our sun. The secondary windings represents all the matter contained within the scalar field of our solar system. This magnetic space is powered by charged particles at a low level of current.


This solar magnetic field acts like a information storage system which interconnects all matter within its field. For example, the magnetosphere of the Earth interacts with the solar magnetic field through a “Flux Transfer Event” where by a portal opens up and charged particles from the sun enter the Earth’s atmosphere. NASA has a group of satellites called THEMELIS which has been monitoring these events.

“Researchers have long known that the Earth and sun must be connected. Earth’s magnetosphere (the magnetic bubble that surrounds our planet) is filled with particles from the sun that arrive via the solar wind and penetrate the planet’s magnetic defenses. They enter by following magnetic field lines that can be traced from terra firma all the way back to the sun’s atmosphere.” – Nasa News 2008 Magnetic Portals Connect Earth with Sun


As the Earth is connected to the Sun, the Black Hole at the center of our galaxy is serving this same purpose with our Sun. According to Dr. Konstanin Meyl. faster than light neutrinos are emanating from the Black Hole and fueling our Sun. This stream of neutrinos generates a magnetic field which appears as a Event Horizon described within physics as the Holographic Principle.


Many believe this Event Horizon extends outward through out the galaxy creating a Galactic Plane (2D Hologrid) where all information within the galaxy is stored just like the magnetic surface of your disk drive in your computer.


In the picture above, NASA has discovered a magnetic field in which our solar system is moving through the galaxy.

The Hologrid also contains holographic information which generates high levels of coherence at the quantum level of the material world which is due to this transformer effect where energy and information moves between the Hologrid and the material world.

An example of this quantum process can be seen in the biological systems on earth. Since, the beginning of the natural sciences the view of nature was solely an biological/chemical process but a new finding by a group of Toronto scientists published a paper that theorizes that the efficiency of photosynthesis can only be explained by quantum mechanics.

“There’s been a lot of excitement and speculation that nature may be using quantum mechanical practices,” says chemistry professor Greg Scholes, lead author of a new study published this week in Nature. “Our latest experiments show that normally functioning biological systems have the capacity to use quantum mechanics in order to optimize a process as essential to their survival as photosynthesis.” – See Article

Others like Dr. Fritz-Albert Popp who’s researched has been characterized as fringe science have suggested that these quantum mechanical processes within the cells use a form of electromagnetic energy called “biophotons” to assist in this process where energy and information is transferred.

“In the 1970s the then assistant professor Fritz-Albert Popp and his research group at the University of Marburg (Germany) showed that the spectral distribution of the emission fell over a wide range of wavelengths, from 200 to 800 nm. Popp proposed that the radiation might be both semi-periodic and coherent.

Russian, German, and other biophotonics experts, often adopting the term “biophotons” from Popp, have theorized, like Gurwitsch, that they may be involved in cell functions, such as mitosis, or even that they may be produced and detected by the DNA in the cell nucleus. In 1974 Dr. V.P. Kaznacheyev announced that his research team in Novosibirsk had detected intercellular communication by means of these rays.” –

“A biophoton (from the Greek βίος meaning “life” and φῶς meaning “light”) is a photon of non-thermal origin in the visible and ultraviolet spectrum emitted from a biological system. Emission of biophotons is technically a type of bioluminescence, but the latter term is generally reserved for higher luminance luciferin/luciferase systems. The term biophoton used in this narrow sense should not be confused with the broader field of biophotonics, which studies the general interaction of light with biological systems.
The typical observed radiant emittance of biological tissues in the visible and ultraviolet frequencies ranges from 10−19 to 10−16 W/cm2 (approx 1-1000 photons/cm2/second). This light intensity is much weaker than that seen in the perceptually visible and well-researched phenomenon of normal bioluminescence but is detectable above the background of thermal radiation emitted by tissues at their normal temperature.

While detection of biophotons have been reported by several groups, hypotheses that such biophotons indicate the state of biological tissues and facilitate a form of cellular communication are controversial.” –

The key to Dr. Popp work has been his observations of how these electromagnetic biophotons energize and assist in the chemical processes within the cell at a high level of coherence that is even beyond any quantum mathematical model. For example, the efficiency of maintaining a coherent stream of photons from a laser is a tenth of second, while biological system have electromagnetic coherence that is measured within days and weeks.

One explanation of this coherence phenomenon could be explained by a higher frequency energy field around life which is connected to a 2D holographic information grid which helps guides these biophotons to be so efficient.


The ancient chinese discovered these energetic pathways or what they called meridians where a energy called ‘qi’ which travels through specific points on the skin that connect to the organs within our body. When these points are out of balance they can cause illness. Acupuncture was designed to return these points back into there natural state of homostatis.


While philosophers such as the Theosophist of the late 19th century described this phenomenon as,

“… the etheric body inhabits an etheric plane which corresponds to the four higher subplanes of the physical plane. The intended reference is therefore to some extremely rarefied matter, analogous in usage to the word “spirit” (originally “breath”).” – Wikipedia. org

Dr. Popp would call this light bioluminescence or Theosophist’s would call the Aura radiates in the ultraviolet range which is not visible to human sight. In the video above, he takes living plant material and inserts it into a chamber where a highly sensitive photomultiplier is installed to detect these biophotons.

As we have discussed in part one, Tesla waves radiate outward from its source faster than the speed of light and if they encounter a medium such as water (75 % human body) they interacts with its hydrogen electrons to emit high frequency light. Dr. Popp estimates that there are about 100,000 biophoton interactions within each cell in our body per second. DNA could be the source of these Tesla waves and If this is true, this high level of coherence of electromagnetic energy within biological life is beyond our current understanding of quantum mechanics.

If this discovery is valid it will shatter the accepted theory that the universe changes over time solely through the quantum mechanical physics of energy and matter. The source for this order could be another level of reality that contains a third state beyond energy and matter which is stored as 2D Holographic Information.

From a physicist perspective, all information within the cosmos is generated by entropy which,

“…is the amount of additional information needed to specify the exact physical state of a system, given its thermodynamic specification. The role of thermodynamic entropy in various thermodynamic processes can thus be understood by understanding how and why that information changes as the system evolves from its initial condition. It is often said that entropy is an expression of the disorder, or randomness of a system, or of our lack of information about it (which on some views of probability, amounts to the same thing as randomness).”


In other words, entropy is the quantum interactions of matter and energy where the overall probability of these changes over time will move towards increased states of disorder or randomness. The classic example is ice melting in a glass of water at room temperature.

“The entire miniature ‘universe’, i.e. this thermodynamic system, has increased in entropy. Energy has spontaneously become more dispersed and spread out in that ‘universe’ than when the glass of ice + water was introduced and became a ‘system’ within it.” –

This theory seems to contradict the advent of life on planet earth, where living systems have thrived instead of moving towards increased states of disorder. Nobel physicist Erwin Schrodinger calls this aberration negative entropy which was later labeled as, “Negentropy”.

“…to express it in a more “positive” way: a living system imports negentropy and stores it” – Erwin Schrodinger

This might imply that since life formed within our Galaxy, it is some type of negentropic system that is surrounded by a sea of entropy (empty space) which is another way of describing the symbolic polarized meaning of the Taijutu.


Thus, the GFC not only generates information but stores and replicates it by using a specific form of galactic scalar energy which is encoded with the information to replicate and support life.

Schrodinger implied this about negentropy when he wrote.

“…if I had been catering for them [physicists] alone I should have let the discussion turn on free energy instead. It is the more familiar notion in this context.” –

Free Energy (i.e. the Sun) is not only a source of negentropy within in the solar system but would also includes an informational qualities which allows it to be stored and replicated. Thus, the mechanism which supports this negentropic quality on Earth is DNA.


In his book called “DNA And Cell Resonance” Dr. Meyl describes DNA’s electromagnetic structure when he  writes,

“Hydrogen bonds, from our modest knowledge in biology class hold together through Coulomb forces electrically polarized with base pairs in the DNA Strand. To gain access to this polarization, the hydrogen bonds must be separated, and this requires even higher, radial outward electric field lines. I speak in this case a vortex field.

Since the magnetic field is perpendicular to the electrical vertical field, this has an axial direction to the DNA strand. The motion of the vortex field is in the direction of the magnetic field so a longitudinal wave results in a so-called magnetic scalar wave.” – Dr. Konstantin Meyl – DNA And Cell Resonance

Even DNA researcher determine the viability of stable DNA around 260 – 280 nano meters in length. This is because DNA’s ability to maintain its informational structure is largely due to how closely the spiral structure (inductors) are compacted. According to Glenn Elert if you were to stretch all the DNA in your body it would reach the Sun and back seventy times.“Length of a Human DNA Molecule,” The Physics Factbook, Edited by Glenn Elert).

An example, of this internal coil structure within DNA can be seen in the nucleotides which serve as the building blocks of DNA and carry energy within the cell. According to Dr. Meyl,

“Valuable information can be observed by the tendency of the helix to form a coil with two turns of globular proteins called histones. This corresponds to two turns of a half period. Thus , the transition from one histone to the next always occurs in a wave node, corresponding to half of the wavelength. If a coil produces the positive half-wave of the wavelenght, the neighboring coils is responsible for the negative half wave and vice versa.” – Konstanin Meyl – DNA and Cell Resonance: Magnetic Waves Enable Cell Communication 2012


This configuration is a classic Tesla/Transformer design where each winding are in polarity with each other creating a Tesla coil resonance circuit within each neighboring nucleotide pairs.

This type of resonance  connection is described by Dr. Meyl as the magnetic version of the Tesla waves called Meyl waves. This is where information is being transferred between cells. In the video below, Dr. Meyl summarizes a presentation he gave at a Chinese University in 2011 where he reviewed his work on this process where he demonstrates killing cancers cells. He uses his Tesla coil kit and where he takes cancers cells and adds a chemotherapy poison in one container which he places on one coil and another container with unaltered cancer cells on the receiver Tesla coil. After, a 24 hr period all the unaltered cancers cells in the receiver coil were killed. This would revolutionize medicine by not having to take drugs within our bodies eliminating all side effects.

If the ancients had discovered the source of this negentropic energy was from the sun, this could have merged into their religious belief systems. In the Egyptian case, I believe it was due to a discovery made by the egyptian priesthood of Atlantean artifacts. Plato wrote in Timeaus at around 360 B.C of Atlantis which he said was told to him by an egyptian priest. (See Blog,Freeing Ourselves with Radiant Energy).


There is great debate as to the age of the Giza complex and how the Egyptians built such a precise structures with only copper and bronze made tools.


Researcher such as Robert Schoch, a Yale trained Ph.d in geology and a BA in anthropology from George Washington University first studied the Sphinx complex in Egypt in the early 1990’s.

“I came to the conclusion that the oldest portions of the Great Sphinx, what I refer to as the core-body, must date back to an earlier period (at least 5000 B.C., and maybe as early as 7000 or 9000 B.C.), a time when the climate was very different and included more rain.” –Robert Schoch Website

If we use the extreme date between 11,000 to 12,000 years ago, we find that the Great Pyramid was aligned to the polestar Vega which is in the Lyra constellation.

“The importance of the pole star is not merely its indication of true north and south, thus pointing out the variations of the compass needle, but it also serves another purpose, namely, that of obtaining the latitude at any time of the night by an inconsiderable amount of figuring – something which cannot be accomplished by any other star.

If the pole star were situated exactly at the pole, the latitude could be obtained by the simple measurement of its altitude.” Science and Industry, Volume 4 by Anonymous

The pyramid could have been used as a reference point within a navigation system similar to how we use Greenwhich, England as the prime median.

“A prime meridian is a meridian, i.e. a line of longitude, at which longitude is defined to be 0°. A prime meridian and its opposite in a 360°-system, the 180th meridian (at 180° longitude), form a great circle.

This great circle divides the sphere, e.g. the Earth, into two hemispheres. If one uses directions of East and West from a defined prime meridian, then they can be called Eastern Hemisphere and Western Hemisphere.” –

Again those who built the Giza pyramids were highly technical engineers, navigators and scientist. They understood the GFC design and used the Giza pyramid as a capacitor to resonate the quartz crystal within the limestone and granite material. Others, such as Christopher Dunnhas pioneered this idea that the great pyramid was a power plant since 1998.

The Giza complex not only was used as a resonance generator where receiving inductors (Tesla coils) could wirelessly network to transfer energy and information but also used to resonate water. The Atlantean’s could have discovered a way to use Tesla waves to interact with water at a high frequency where it increased cell communication and immune qualities within biological systems.

In the work of John Cadmanhe proposed that the Great Pyramid was also designed as a water pumping station that was feed by a underground aqueduct system from a ancient lake above the Giza plateau. The Giza complex could have been used to pump water into a large aquifer below the pyramids that feed into a well system on the plateau.


“…within the bedrock of the plateau, the limestone strata tilts down towards the river, which forms the edge of the Nile Valley aquifer.” – The History, Technology and Philosopy of Civilization X – Edward F Malikoski


The Giza complex is filled with tunnels and wells shafts which were used during and after the Atlantean’s times. The Egyptian were only able to use these wells when the rainfall in this region was still stable. These structures are a mixture of Egyptian and Atlantean on the Giza plateau which accessed this large aquifer.

This energized water could have been used to grow foods through agriculture and provided a water purification system to create a healthy environment where DNA mutation didn’t led to illness due to the elimination of parasites, viruses and bacteria within the human body. These microbes naturally occur within nature and are used to breakdown biological systems. (see work of Royal Rife and Hulda Clark in using Electromagnetic Therapy on killing parasites and bacteria within the body).

This environmental system could have led to the myths of a “Garden of Eden” since this site is close to the cradle of civilization located in Sumeria.


Other technologies which were documented in the egyptian hieroglyphs show some type of electrical devices used within the temples.

Modern science is at the cusp of rewriting history and turning some spiritual practices into practical knowledge. Especially the work in developing technology to transfer and store information/energy. If the phenomenon of Negentropy within the solar system is correct then a highly efficient form of information storage is taking place within the Hologrid . One way you might understand how this might occur in nature is to review a discovery by Dr. Dan Schectman who was awarded the Nobel Prize in chemistry in 2011 for his work on Quasicrystals.

“..quasicrystals is a structure that is ordered but not periodic. A quasicrystalline pattern can continuously fill all available space, but it lacks translational symmetry. While crystals, according to the classical crystallographic restriction theorem, can possess only two, three, four, and six-fold rotational symmetries, the Bragg diffraction pattern of quasicrystals shows sharp peaks with other symmetry orders, for instance five-fold.”-


While the above picture uses a 3D perspective from a 6D electron diffraction pattern.

“A hexeract (6-cube) pattern using 6D orthographic projection to a 3D Perspective (visual) object (the Rhombic triacontahedron) using the Golden ratio in the basis vectors. This is used to understand the aperiodic Icosahedral structure of Quasicrystals.” –


(In the picture above, is a electron diffraction patterns of the atomic structure of an Ho-Mg-Zn quasicrystal. Superimposed is a 5D orthographic projection onto its 2D image).

While science can’t wait to explore the possibilities in developing future technologies of quasicrystals, we also should pay close attention to how negentropic information could be stored in a aperiodic format where complex 3D holographic information could be transferred into a 2D configuration.

“In 1944, Schrödinger sought to explain how hereditary information is stored: molecules were deemed too small, amorphous solids were plainly chaotic, so it had to be a kind of crystal; as a periodic structure could not encode information, it had to be aperiodic. DNA was later discovered, and, although not crystalline, it possesses properties predicted by Schrödinger—it is a regular but aperiodic molecule.” –


The Hologrid structure suggest a fractal information system of micro networks such as DNA to larger networks similar to a wireless cloud storage memory system. The Milkyway Galaxy could be part of a larger Hologrid cloud network which is part of the Virgo SuperCluster, Our extended galactic neighbors,

“..consists of two components: an appreciably flattened disk containing two-thirds of the supercluster’s luminous galaxies, and a roughly spherical halo containing the remaining one-third.


Our solar system could be a unique living library for our specific type of life and a intergalactic access point into other Hologrids which could be due to the maturity our Sun and its location within the Virgo Supercluster.


Back to the Future, The Black Hole Paradox and the Tao

In the classic 1985 film “Back to the Future”, Steven Spielberg tells the story of Marty McFly who goes back in time and mistakenly meets his mother who falls for him. This creates the possibility that his father and mother will not get together, thus, wiping out his existence because he would never be born. This is a classical time travel paradox leading many to believe that traveling into the past is impossible.

But for some scientists who do believe time travel into the past is possible have proposed that Black Holes might be using a process where quantum information is being teleportated  from the future to create a physical event in the past.

The concept of a Black Hole was predicted by General Relativity and through the work of Karl Schwarzschild who developed a model called the Schwarzschild Radius, proposed a new type of object in the universe where its mass becomes so dense its gravitational field would create a boundary where matter or light could not escape. This boundary later became known as the “Event Horizon”.

Inside a Black Hole exist what is called a gravitational singularity which is described as,

” the quantities that are used to measure the gravitational field become infinite in a way that does not depend on the coordinate system. These quantities are the scalar invariant curvatures of spacetime, which includes a measure of the density of matter.” –

However, there are some parts of a Black Hole that don’t follow our current understandings of physics. For example, what happens to the quantum information of matter when it enters the singularity.

In the 1970’s Steven Hawking answered this question when he discovered that Black Holes emitted heat which later became known as  “Hawking Radiation”. Hawking created a controversy when he stated in his paper that this radiation didn’t preserved the physical information of the mass within the Black Hole. If Hawking was right and this quantum information was forever lost within the singularity then this violated a quantum principle that information is always preserved within its wave function.

Others physicists such as Leonard Susskind argued this fact with Hawking and continued the controversy for twenty years because they believed,

” if the material entering the black hole were a pure quantum state, the transformation of that state into a mixed state of Hawking radiation would destroy information about the original quantum state. This violates Liouville’s theorem and presents a physical paradox. –

In 1982, Jacob Bekenstein proposed a new theory where the quantum information of the mass within the Black Hole was proportional to the surface area of the event horizon. This new theory led to the Holographic Principle developed by Gerald ‘Hooft and latter refined by Dr. Leonard Susskind where the physical information of the mass of the Black Hole was equivalent to the information contained within its two dimensional surface area of the event horizon. (for further information see the blog – “The World as a Hologram”).

Another way to look at this holographic theorem is to view processes that are happening on the event horizon and the state of matter in the Black Hole are complementarity or just two ways of observing the same quantum information.

“The idea is as follows; a quantum gravity theory in the interior of an anti-de-sitter spacetime is completely equivalent to an ordinary quantum particle theory living on the boundary. If true, this equivalence means that we can use quantum particle theory (which is relatively well understood) to define quantum gravity theory (which is not).” – Juan Maldacena – Illusion of Gravity 2005

(Note: If you want to understand how string theory, Ads/CFT correspondence and the Holographic Principle is applied to our universe read the November 2005 article in Scientific American called “The Illusion of Gravity” by Dr. Juan Maldacena).

Leonard Susskind and Gerard ‘Hooft applied the Holographic Principle to the Black Hole Information Paradox by describing this as a complementarity process because it allows a set of quantum information to exist in two different forms even if one exists in another place in time. This is consistent with quantum mechanics because  time is viewed as a continuum where future and past behavior of particles are all held within its wave function. This complementarity analogy is similar to how we understand the wave/particle phenomenon of light where it can be viewed within either of these two states but never both simultaneously.

This wasn’t a complete solution to the paradox because we still needed a way to avoid the loss of quantum information due to the Black Hole’s singularity. A solution to this problem was proposed by Gary Horowitz and Juan Maldacena called the The Black Hole Final State” .

“We propose that at the black hole singularity one needs to impose a unique final state boundary condition. More precisely, we have a unique final wave function for the interior of the black hole. … This final boundary condition makes sure that no information is “absorbed” by the singularity. … The final state boundary condition at the black hole singularity acts like a measurement that collapses the state into one associated with the infalling matter. This transfer the information to the outgoing Hawking radiation in a process similar to “quantum teleporation”. – Horowitz and Maldacena 2005.

Dr. Seth Lloyd of MIT who specializes in Mechanical Engineering and Quantum Computing explained this process of Black Hole evaporation similar to the process of a quantum computer.

“If information escapes as black holes evaporate, then black holes could function as quantum computers. Recently, Horowitz and Maldacena proposed a model of black-hole evaporation that imposes a final-state boundary condition at the black-hole singularity. The resulting projection onto a final state gives rise to a nonlinear time evolution for the quantum states in and outside of the black-hole, which permits quantum information to escape form the black hole by a process akin to teleportation.” – Almost Certain Escape from Black Hole in Final State Projection – Seth Lloyd 2006

(Reference – see – quantum teleportation)

Dr. Lloyd uses this quantum teleportation model within the Black Hole evaporation process to explain as these particles reach this boundary their wave function collapses which teleports its current quantum information into the past through emerging particles or singlets at the event horizon which produces Hawking Radiation. This ability to project quantum information backwards in time is explained by Seth Lloyd theory called Projective Closed Time-like Curves. –Almost Certain Escape from Black Hole in Final State Projection – Seth Lloyd 2006

The physics is made through the possibility of using Closed Time-Like Curves within our universe in a lecture he gave in November 2004. Kurt Godel first came up with this concept through working with Albert Einstein at Princeton. And later in 1991 physicist David Deutsch used this concept to propose using Closed Time-like Curves to travel into the past, where according to his theory would create a new alternate version of the past which agreed with the concepts of the “many worlds” hypothesis of time travel developed by Hugh Everett. (Note: Dr. Lloyd’s theory differs from David Duetsch proposal by not creating alternate time lines).

According to modern physics the creation of Closed Time-like Curves are possible in rotating closed spheres. The classic way of visualizing these closed time-like curves is to picture the universe like a cup and the handle would represent the closed time-like curve which is the pathway from the future into the past.

In the bottom picture, Lloyd proposes a Projective Closed Time-like Curves similar to Quantum Teleportation which he proposed is taking place within Black Holes. He describes this process as a quantum channel where information is teleported between two qubits. This type of post selection quantum channel prevents time travel paradoxes because the quantum teleportation process between the two qubits disallows a mixed quantum state to occur, such as, starting out alive in the future and dead in the past.

Below is a video where Dr. Lloyd gave a lecture on this subject matter. (Note, this video is not for novices for he is talking to mostly Quantum Computing graduates students).


(Note: the following are my own personal views on the nature of reality)

For a moment, lets assume our universe doesn’t contain Dark Matter and we live in anti-de-sitter space which has the characteristics of a Singularity. Then what is the Singularity? Physics defines it as a infinitely curved space.

However, if gravity is a illusion as Dr. Maldacena proposes then understanding how the Singularity functions is the key to understanding our reality. An example of this type of space is depicted in M.C.Escher print called Circle Limit III. Escher created a visual representation of a type of mathematics called  Hyperbolic Geometry where a negative curvature expands infinitely at the edges of a sphere.

In the picture below, Daina Tamina used crocheting to create geometric hyperbolic planes that are very similar to coral reefs.

Another mathematical concept that nature uses is the science of fractals which can form into simple or complex objects due to their ability to repeat self-similar patterns continuously into smaller and smaller scales like Escher Circle Limit III.

Another clue of the singularity is the observation that have perplexed scientist, is the negligible effect of gravity at the quantum scale.

To maintain this astronomical model, scientist have speculated that our galaxy is surrounded by dark matter which explains how gravity can hold all the matter together over million of light years, especially in its outer spiral arms. Astrophysicist call this the Dark Matter Halo (simulated picture above) which the theory explains why the rotational curve of the galaxy doesn’t decrease from the galactic center.

If this dark matter isn’t confirmed, at some point, astrophysics will need to stop coming up with exotic matter/forces to keep there standard model intact and come up with a more reasonable theory. Thus, lets try another approach and assume Einstein’s view of gravity as a curvature of space-time in the present of mass is a good observational model but isn’t the source for gravity.

Then, what is the gravitic force which holds galaxies and solar systems together?

Before General Relativity, science explained gravity through Issac Newton theory which states,

Every point mass attracts every single other point mass by a force pointing along the line intersecting both points. The force is proportional to the product of the two masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.” –

When you examine this formula, it is very close to “Columb Law” which states, that “The force of attraction or repulsion between two point charges is directly proportional to the product of magnitude of each charge and inversely proportional to the square of distance between them.”

If we assume these two theories are connected then gravity could be explained as aelectrogravitic effect. Newton’s theory was in the ballpark of earthbound objects but when it came to explaining very large objects in the universe such as Black Holes or neutron stars, General Relativity explained these objects more fully. However, recently, a Professor named Konstanin Meyl explains how gravity is an electrogravitic effect. Meyl proposes the effects of gravity follow an universal theorem called the Inverse Square Law with says:

is any physical law stating that a specified physical quantity or intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity.” –

Meyl applies this law to both a gravitational or electromagnetic field which radiates from a source using the inverse-square law.


“The inverse-square law generally applies when some force, energy, or other conserved quantity is radiated outward radially in three-dimensional space from a point source. Since the surface area of a sphere (which is 4πr2 ) is proportional to the square of the radius, as the emitted radiation gets farther from the source, it is spread out over an area that is increasing in proportion to the square of the distance from the source. Hence, the intensity of radiation passing through any unit area (directly facing the point source) is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the point source. –

If the earth and the sun have a electromagnetic relationship, then what appears to be gravity is the earth movement is propelled through a positive and negative electromagnetic interaction as it rotates around the sun. According to Dr. Meyl this electromagnetic force creates a type of contraction and expansion of the earth due to one side the earth is always facing away from the sun which creates a type of breathing effect.

However, this effect can not be detected because all the instruments on earth are also expanding and contracting, this is why the famous Michelson-Morely experiment was unsuccessful in discovering this electromagnetic connection with the sun. The only way this scalar field could be detected would be take a measurement outside of our solar system, which James Bradley proposed in 1727.

Dr. Konstantin Meyl Universal Theory predicts that instead of a nuclear reaction process powering the sun, there is a electromagnetic process occurring. Nikola Tesla in the early 1900’s, discovered this electromagnetic relationship between the earth and the sun. He found cosmic rays emanating from the sun and experimented with this energy which he called Radiant Energy (see Freeing Ourselves with Radiant Energy). Meyl proposed these particles were neutrinos who source originates from the Black Holes at the center of our galaxy.

Dr. Meyl used Tesla work to develop a Galactic Model where these high frequency energy particles traveled faster than the speed of light through out the galaxy in a fractal manner where resonant receivers such as Suns absorbed these particles within there cores which in turn are re-transmitted into a slower neutrino particles. At each stage these neutrino’s are absorbed and converted into matter (gas/elements) at the center of suns and planets.


At the center of the earth are heavy neutrons particles which interact with these cosmic neutrinos which create beta decay creating hydrogen gas. The gas uses the radiation generated by the beta decay to returned back into a neutron due to the high pressure. This creates a equilibrium of forces which create a Bose-Einstein condensate at absolute zero which creates superconductive high pressure gas/plasma which is creating the electromagnetic field which surrounds the earth and not due to some hot rotating metal ball. All the elements of the earth are created due to this process at the center of the earth (except carbon).

If gravity is electromagnetic and if we could prove that the neutrino interaction causes the strong nuclear  force within matter then we live in a electromagnetic universe (the weak nuclear force is already attributed to neutrino interaction – radioactive decay. This would mean the processes within Black Holes, White Dwarfs and Neutron stars are not due to gravitational collapse but in someway are affected through a change in the flow of these high frequency neutrino’s being absorbed within its core. These are examples of how this neutrino energy is able to effect the ratio of mass within matter over large periods of time.

In the Standard Model, physics defines the neutrino as a massless particle that does not interact with the Higgs Bosons which creates mass. In Dr Meyl model, there is only one force which is structured like a vortex ring of electrical potential which creates all the elementary particles.

The model for these electrical ring vortexes are explained by Dr. Meyl by using an simple example of electromagnetic waves being transmitted and received through an antenna. In the picture below, an RF electromagnetic wave is spreading out from a antenna. In the near field they appear like vortexes but as they approached the far field they begin to expand and stretch out creating standard  electromagnetic waves.

dipole fields


In the bottom picture, these ring vortexes rotate at the speed of light while the electrical wave moves perpendicular to these vortexes. These electrical vortexes travel like a longitudinal wave which can adjust the frequency of individual waves due to its oscillation structure. Its most common form appear as electromagnetic waves which moves at the speed of light.

This oscillating property is due to the Lorentz contraction effect. As the electrical potential of these vortexes are increased they boost the frequency of the wave. Meyl proposes that this property allows these scalar waves to be a frequency converter in forming all the elementary particles.

This oscillating process is analogous to those two strings hand toys with a paper disk in the middle. The string represents the wave and the disk represents the electrical vortexes. As the string is winding up and gets shorter which is done by twirling the disk, the potential of the wave is increased (higher wave frequency) and the electrical vortex potential grows larger. And when you pulling the string apart the energy within the string is released which is the same as the electrical vortex potential is being discharged and vortex ring becomes smaller and their wavelength gets longer.


These faster than light particles propagate similar to a sound wave moving through different types of mediums within the near field. When they move at the speed of light they are unstable so some of these waves discharge in the near field and are transformed into heat which is called antenna noise. In the far field  the rest of the scalar waves are converted to electromagnetic waves, however, if you could oscillate them at a higher frequency they would become stable and they can propagate faster than the speed of light in the far field. (Note: This was reported at Cern in 2011  but was retracted later).

Dr. Meyl also discovered a magnetic version of this neutrino energy which runs perpendicular to the Radiant Energy which he calls the Meyl wave. This wave carries the holographic information. This wave encodes information like the hard drive in your computer.

If this is true, then Dr. Lloyd was correct in describing Black Holes as a quantum channel. Our sun also physically interacts with this flow of neutrinos particles from the Black Hole every 13,000 as our solar system completes a full cycle every 26,000 years (precession) through the galactic plane. (See Blog Helio Physics)

As these neutrinos travel faster than the speed of light, they decay and are absorbed within the cores of suns which are then re-emitted at lower frequencies within planetary bodies of the solar system. Thus, the galaxy appears to be a structure of resonating energy points (Black Holes, Suns and Planets) which creates a electromagnetic circuit where each connection fits in within one another just like the Russian Dolls in the picture below.


Nicola Tesla discovered this phenomenon in the early 1900’s and called it Radiant Energy (See Freeing Ourselves with Radiant Energy) which he described as cosmic particles (neutrinos) emanating from the Sun. Tesla developed a prototype where he was able to transfer Radiant Energy wirelessly when he built the Wardenclyffe Tower between 1901 – 1917. The facility was never completed due to Tesla not be able to fully fund the project.


Tesla was quoted as saying,

“It is not a dream, it is a simple feat of scientific electrical engineering, only expensive – blind, faint-hearted, doubting world! […] Humanity is not yet sufficiently advanced to be willingly led by the discoverer’s keen searching sense. But who knows? Perhaps it is better in this present world of ours that a revolutionary idea or invention instead of being helped and patted, be hampered and ill-treated in its adolescence – by want of means, by selfish interest, pedantry, stupidity and ignorance; that it be attacked and stifled; that it pass through bitter trials and tribulations, through the strife of commercial existence. So do we get our light. So all that was great in the past was ridiculed, condemned, combatted, suppressed – only to emerge all the more powerfully, all the more triumphantly from the struggle.” – “The Transmission of Electrical Energy Without Wires as a Means for Furthering Peace,” Electrical World and Engineer, January 7, 1905.

During this early period of the discovery of electricity, the government wasn’t funding much research, so these early pioneers were subject to venture capitalist like J.P Morgan who were only interested in the bottom line rather than pure research. Tesla discoveries were put aside and this line of researched was forgotten. However, if Tesla had a more academic background he could have published his finding and experiments and we might have started a whole new line of research that could have eventually trumped the invention of wireless communication by decades.

The  modern era should have been dominated by Tesla but instead Albert Einstein’s research on General Relativity and his famous equation E=MC2 took the scientific community by storm which eventually led to nuclear technology and expanded the field of astrophysics. However, Einstein equation for matter and energy was self referential and did not explain what is energy.

The famous physicist Richard Feynman said,

“It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge what energy is. We do not have a picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount.” – Richard Feynman Lectures 1964.

According to science, energy-matter expanded at the beginning of the Big Bang and will continue until the end of time. In this model the universe is solely dependence on mass and gravity while Dr. Meyl theory is dominated by a single source of energy, electricity.

Einstein made the analogy if you could take a ride on a photon of light, the world would appear to stand still. Thus, if energy is transferred faster than the speed of light it also has no time component from our perspective within the galaxy which is why it appears to come out of nowhere.

This creates a very intimate connection to our creator because the energy we experience that fuels our body and within the environment is occurring in real time and not in some distant point in the past when creation first began. We live in a holographic-energy grid where each resonating point, like the cells within our body are connected to a universal circuit. This circuit not only carries energy but information as Dr. Meyl proposed.

Quantum Mechanics defines this information as a wave function which describes how a particle will behaves over time. The method is used to predict the probability of quantum interactions of particles such as the physics of electromagnetism. In the modern era, QED (Quantum Electrodynamics) is the most successful and verified theorem in physics today, without this theorem solid state electronics, lasers, etc.. wouldn’t exist which is the foundation of our modern technology.

One aspect that both Einstein (Special Relativity) and Quantum Mechanics agreed upon is that time exists as a continuum where the past, present and future events exist simultaneously. Quantum information exist in two forms as holographic information within a 2D dimension (wave function) and as a 3D object within the space-time.

Similar to the teleporation process of quantum information that occurs within Black Holes, a type of retro-causation process could also be occurring on a larger scale where by events from the past and the future are effecting each other. (note: The science is explained in my article, Retro-Casuation and the Symmetry of Time)


In Terence Mckenna Timewave Zero Theory, he describes historical time as a novelty wave which is a measurement of change over time (a quality of newest and originality). The chart above shows how change can have similar historical ramifications when novelty rates are in resonance. Mckenna developed this algorithm by studying the mathematical changes within the sixty-four hexagrams of the I Ching.

“McKenna expressed “novelty” in a computer program which purportedly produces a waveform known as “timewave zero” or the “timewave”. “Timewave zero” is a numerological formula that purports to calculate the ebb and flow of “novelty”, defined as increase over time in the universe’s interconnectedness, or organized complexity.Based on McKenna’s interpretation of the King Wen sequence of the I Ching, the graph appears to show great periods of novelty corresponding with major shifts in humanity’s biological and sociocultural evolution. He believed that the events of any given time are recursively related to the events of other times …”. –

This is the hidden concept folded within the I Ching. In my blog, “The Science of the I Ching” describes a system based upon a mathematical fractal algorithm which Mckenna uncovered. Much of this science is explained within Chaos Theory which is used to develop mathematical models called attractors to predict changes in dynamic systems such as weather systems. These attractors are able to map these novelty patterns over time which meteorologist use to predict future weather patterns.

According to the ancients, quantum interactions which are depicted as a oscillations between opposites (Yin/Yang – Hot/Cold) within these dynamic systems create cyclical novelty waves over time (attractors) which generate harmonic connections between past and future events.

For example, this retro-causation model is very similar to the process of a Black Hole when it is used as a quantum channel to teleport quantum information from the past into future emerging particles creating Hawking Radiation.  This example shows the wave function of particles not only interact on a linear bases within small distance and time but also have a retro-causation component as well.

According to the ancients our reality emerging from Wu-Chi which is symbolized by a empty circle which represents the infinite probabilities within our space-time which is a type of universal wave function for the cosmos. Most of us think of the circle as a boundary but as in Escher’s Circle Limit III drawing shows, the boundary is fractal thus representing a curve that expands into infinity.

From Wu-Chi emerges our 3D space-time reality through a novelty wave that is generated through a oscillation between opposites called yin and yang.


Maybe the ancients were describing a philosophical system that was based upon knowledge of Quantum Electrodynamics. I will be exploring this subject in connection to how biology mimics these quantum process in my next blog.

[ ]

It’s All In The Wave – Scientists Say DNA Begins As a Waveform

© stockclip

One strand of DNA from one single cell contains enough information to clone an entire organism. Obviously, understanding DNA allows us to understand much about life and the universe around us. A deeper understanding of the new science tell us that DNA beings not as a molecule, but as a wave form. Even more interestingly, this wave form exists as a pattern within time and space and is coded throughout the entire universe.

We are surrounded by pulsating waves of invisible genetic information, whose waves create microscopic gravitational forces that pull in atoms and molecules from their surrounding environment to construct DNA.

One scientist who caught these microgravitational forces in their action is Dr. Sergey Leikin. In 2008, Leikin put different types of DNA in regular salt water and marked each type with a different fluorescent color and the DNA molecules were then scattered throughout the water. In the experiment’s major surprise, matching DNA molecules were found pairing together. After a short time, entire clusters of the same colored DNA molecules had formed. Leikin believes some sort of electromagnetic charge allowed the same colored molecules to cluster. However, other experiments show that this is not the case. That it is most likely to be gravity. Let us explain.

In 2011, Nobel Prize winner Dr. Luc Montagnier demonstrated that DNA can be spontaneously formed out of merely hydrogen and oxygen. He started out with a hermetically sealed tube of pure sterilized water and then placed another sealed tube next to it, which had small amounts of DNA floating in water. Montagnier then electrified both tubes with a weak, 7 hertz electromagnetic field and waited. 18 hours later, little pieces of DNA had grown in the original tube, which consisted of only pure sterilized water.

This new science tells us that the universe is constantly conspiring to make biological life, whenever and wherever it can. In any given area of the universe, these hidden microgravitational waves will begin gathering atoms and molecules together to create DNA, and thus, life.

Another phenomenal discovery was made when Dr. Fritz-Albert Popp caught DNA in the act of pulling in photons (tiny packets of energy that make up visible light). The new science reveals that photons are essential to the basic health and function of DNA and are apparently used to send and receive information throughout the body. He found that each DNA molecule stores up to 1,000 photons within itself, similar to that of a tiny fiber-optic cable. The photons shoot back and forth at the speed of light inside the molecule and are stored until they need to be used.

In 1984, Russian scientist Dr. Peter Gariaev discovered that when a DNA molecule was placed inside a small quartz container, it naturally absorbed every photon in the room. A stunning analogy of this would be that of a single person standing in a large sports stadium and having every photon in the stadium somehow bending directly to that person, leaving that person’s body literally glowing with light, while the rest of the stadium goes completely dark.

In conventional science, the only force that can bend light is gravity and it is done only around a black hole. Thus, it appears DNA is generating a microgravitational effect that attracts and captures light. Looking back to the first experiment mentioned in this article by Dr. Leikin, we see that it is indeed likely not an electrical charge that forced or allowed the same DNA molecules to attract to one other, but is likely due to gravity, as electrical charges have never been able to bend light as it moves through space.

The most incredible part of Dr. Gariaev’s experiment came when he thought it was over. He had pulled out the DNA from the quartz container and looked back into the container only to find that photons were still spiraling in the exact same place where the DNA had been. Apparently, some sort of gravitational influence was holding photons right where the DNA had been. This later became called the “DNA phantom effect. Thus, DNA is creating an energetic force that absorbs photons and pulls them right into the molecule, but the DNA itself isn’t even needed. It is some invisible force, or some wave, that attracts and holds the light (photons) there all by itself.

Dr. Gariaev found that he could “blast” the phantom with supercold liquid nitrogen gas and the photons would all escape from the force field. Within 5 to 8 minutes though, new photons would be captured and the entire phantom would reappear. He could keep doing this as much as he wanted, but new photons would keep appearing. In fact, it was only after doing this for 30 days straight that the photons finally did not reappear.

Certainly, this last experiment was done over 30 years ago, and yet, the significance of it has yet to be truly felt. The first two experiments are still relatively young and have also yet to be fully appreciated. Clearly though, our view of the universe and life itself is changing as these concepts are understood by more people each day.

Much of the information in this article came from The Synchronicity Key: The Hidden Intelligence Guiding The Universe and You, by New York Times Best Selling author David Wilcock

Electromagnetic form constants, DNA waveform structure from Keylontic Science:
Walter Russell – In The Waves Lies The Secrets Of Creation

What is a Ferrocell? – Seeing Into the Cross Section of the Secret of Mother Nature

The Ferrocell Lens is a passive device than will enhance the performance of many existing Photonics applications and create new ones.

A Ferrocell does not function from single-potential electrostatics that rely on substrate-based methods which impose limits of motion. A Ferrocell responds to an induced magnetic field and is capable of scattering light with more degrees of freedom than either MEMS (Micro-Electrical-Mechanical System) or FLCD (Ferro-Liquid Crystal Display) technology can obtain.

The Ferrocell’s methodology is based on transforming a black, opaque liquid metal (ferrofluid) into a dispersed, transparent layer less than 50 microns thick. This active layer is contained in a sealed and isolated environment. In this state, the fluid behaves more like a gas than a liquid.

In short, the ferrocell is a step up from traditional magnetic viewing film, delivering a beautiful display of magnetodielectric field reciprocation through the medium of light. Revealing magnetism and all it’s secrets in 3D holographic real time. The cameras don’t do it justice however, you won’t believe the depth of projection unless you see one for yourself.

Invented & patented by a compassionate humanitarian named, Tim. – PLEASE SUPPORT!  ]

Implications of Ferrocell Discoveries Into Trans-Euclidean Field Geometry: